DACA

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: DACA

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:34 am

Hastur wrote:And as always it's the Democrats who stands on the barricades, defending slavery. There is no end to the collective hypocrisy.

It's not just the DNC this time.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: DACA

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:43 am

Zlaxer wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:

But they are not being punished. They are being removed from the nation in which they illegally reside and sent back home.
They are being taken from the awesome country in which they have lived their entire lives, by no choice of their own, and being moved to the shitty country that their parents committed a crime to escape from.

Seems like a punishment.

I suppose you could say that, having attained the age of reason, the truly virtuous among them would have voluntarily removed themselves... but that seems to expect an unrealistic level of saintliness.

Who cares if it seems like punishment.....why are you favoring them over inner city black? There's only so much $$$ to go around.....Why do they deserve to get a cut of it?


Post some stats showing illegals pay more in taxes then they use in government subsidies - then maybe I'll update my position.


You're essentially mandating that we take care of the poor of the world....why is that our job?
Well, leaving aside all of the statements that have nothing to do with this discussion, their only crime is the result of their parents choices. It isn't taking care of the worlds poor. It is recognizing that forced displacement of a person because of a crime someone else committed is questionable jurisprudence.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: DACA

Post by Xenophon » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:47 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
They are being taken from the awesome country in which they have lived their entire lives, by no choice of their own, and being moved to the shitty country that their parents committed a crime to escape from.

Seems like a punishment.

I suppose you could say that, having attained the age of reason, the truly virtuous among them would have voluntarily removed themselves... but that seems to expect an unrealistic level of saintliness.

Who cares if it seems like punishment.....why are you favoring them over inner city black? There's only so much $$$ to go around.....Why do they deserve to get a cut of it?


Post some stats showing illegals pay more in taxes then they use in government subsidies - then maybe I'll update my position.


You're essentially mandating that we take care of the poor of the world....why is that our job?
Well, leaving aside all of the statements that have nothing to do with this discussion, their only crime is the result of their parents choices. It isn't taking care of the worlds poor. It is recognizing that forced displacement of a person because of a crime someone else committed is questionable jurisprudence.
What you don't seem to understand is that there is no way to do anything for these kids and it save the nation some money. Money that could otherwise go to natural citizens.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: DACA

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:50 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:

But they are not being punished. They are being removed from the nation in which they illegally reside and sent back home.
They are being taken from the awesome country in which they have lived their entire lives, by no choice of their own, and being moved to the shitty country that their parents committed a crime to escape from.

Seems like a punishment.

I suppose you could say that, having attained the age of reason, the truly virtuous among them would have voluntarily removed themselves... but that seems to expect an unrealistic level of saintliness.

They are not here legally. They are free to apply for citizenship once they arrive in their home countries, just like every other legal immigrant.

It's not that I don't feel for them, but damn, we can't create incentives for people to illegally bring their babies and young children here illegally like that.

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: DACA

Post by jediuser598 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:51 am

Say an illegal immigrant came here fleeing the violence of their country. Whether it be South America, or the Middle East, or where ever. In sending them back (in this hypothetical) we know that, 100%, this illegal immigrant is going to die. What would you guys do then?

I'm not saying this is always the case with illegal immigration, but I'm wondering what you guys would do if this were the case.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: DACA

Post by Hastur » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:53 am

jediuser598 wrote:Say an illegal immigrant came here fleeing the violence of their country. Whether it be South America, or the Middle East, or where ever. In sending them back (in this hypothetical) we know that, 100%, this illegal immigrant is going to die. What would you guys do then?

I'm not saying this is always the case with illegal immigration, but I'm wondering what you guys would do if this were the case.
They should apply for asylum like any other refugee. That is well regulated. People from Mexico aren't refugees.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: DACA

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:56 am

Xenophon wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:

Who cares if it seems like punishment.....why are you favoring them over inner city black? There's only so much $$$ to go around.....Why do they deserve to get a cut of it?


Post some stats showing illegals pay more in taxes then they use in government subsidies - then maybe I'll update my position.


You're essentially mandating that we take care of the poor of the world....why is that our job?
Well, leaving aside all of the statements that have nothing to do with this discussion, their only crime is the result of their parents choices. It isn't taking care of the worlds poor. It is recognizing that forced displacement of a person because of a crime someone else committed is questionable jurisprudence.
What you don't seem to understand is that there is no way to do anything for these kids and it save the nation some money. Money that could otherwise go to natural citizens.
I understand the conflict perfectly well. The fact that, so far, we haven't come up with something better is a failure of imagination, so we have resolved that the expedient option is the only viable one because we lack the creativity to come up with anything else, despite its troubling implications regarding inherited guilt and collective punishment.

I would have thought such a vigorous anti-SJW crowd would be more receptive to an argument that rejects the notion of inherited guilt, no?
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: DACA

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:58 am

What could possibly be better than following the law? I though you are a lawyer. Don't you have to swear to uphold the rule of law or something?

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: DACA

Post by Xenophon » Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:59 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Xenophon wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Well, leaving aside all of the statements that have nothing to do with this discussion, their only crime is the result of their parents choices. It isn't taking care of the worlds poor. It is recognizing that forced displacement of a person because of a crime someone else committed is questionable jurisprudence.
What you don't seem to understand is that there is no way to do anything for these kids and it save the nation some money. Money that could otherwise go to natural citizens.
I understand the conflict perfectly well. The fact that, so far, we haven't come up with something better is a failure of imagination, so we have resolved that the expedient option is the only viable one because we lack the creativity to come up with anything else, despite its troubling implications regarding inherited guilt and collective punishment.

I would have thought such a vigorous anti-SJW crowd would be more receptive to an argument that rejects the notion of inherited guilt, no?
It's not about guilt. The children of these illegal migrants only become guilty when they reach the age of majority.

So what you're saying is that because we view this scenario through a pragmatic lens, we just aren't imaginative enough? Hmm, let's think. What is a way we can keep these families here without having to make them citizens, AND prevent money that should be for American citizens going to illegal migrants.

I can think of one way, but there's an amendment against it.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: DACA

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:00 am

jediuser598 wrote:Say an illegal immigrant came here fleeing the violence of their country. Whether it be South America, or the Middle East, or where ever. In sending them back (in this hypothetical) we know that, 100%, this illegal immigrant is going to die. What would you guys do then?

I'm not saying this is always the case with illegal immigration, but I'm wondering what you guys would do if this were the case.

You are describing an asylum case. We grant to asylum to refugees who are legitimately in fear of their lives all the time.