Blue whales have massive brains. We should ask them for advice.Speaker to Animals wrote:No. All of us. They possessed more brain matter per pound of body weight than homo sapiens.
Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Blue whales have massive brains. We should ask them for advice.Speaker to Animals wrote:No. All of us. They possessed more brain matter per pound of body weight than homo sapiens.
Per lbs of bodyweight.. not so much.
They are not even anywhere near the same genus as us either. Neanderthals were similar in lots of ways (even possible to breed with them). The brain-to-body mass ratio probably means a lot more within the homo genus.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
When do you finish your phrenology degree?Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Blue whales have massive brains. We should ask them for advice.Speaker to Animals wrote:No. All of us. They possessed more brain matter per pound of body weight than homo sapiens.
Per lbs of bodyweight.. not so much.
They are not even anywhere near the same genus as us either. Neanderthals were similar in lots of ways (even possible to breed with them). The brain-to-body mass ratio probably means a lot more within the homo genus.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
The whole brain size thing has never made sense to me. If it were true a Border Collie would have a proportionally larger brain than a dumbass retriever. And it's hard to fathom size having anything to do with it when a tiny terrier can be just as smart as 150 lb dog, proportion or no. How can it scale down indefinitely? Would a worm whose mass is half brain be smarter than a human? Is there any actual proof of this theory in current natural observation of closely related species?
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
Brain size appears to have little or nothing to do with intelligence. But it sounds truthy.brewster wrote:The whole brain size thing has never made sense to me. If it were true a Border Collie would have a proportionally larger brain than a dumbass retriever. And it's hard to fathom size having anything to do with it when a tiny terrier can be just as smart as 150 lb dog, proportion or no. How can it scale down indefinitely? Would a worm whose mass is half brain be smarter than a human? Is there any actual proof of this theory in current natural observation of closely related species?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
CPU cycles and RAM capacity seem to have little to do with computing power but it sounds truthy.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
So, if you buy the biggest physical processor you can, your computer will be the fastest, right?Speaker to Animals wrote:CPU cycles and RAM capacity seem to have little to do with computing power but it sounds truthy.
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
So you're saying size doesn't matter?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Brain size appears to have little or nothing to do with intelligence. But it sounds truthy.brewster wrote:The whole brain size thing has never made sense to me. If it were true a Border Collie would have a proportionally larger brain than a dumbass retriever. And it's hard to fathom size having anything to do with it when a tiny terrier can be just as smart as 150 lb dog, proportion or no. How can it scale down indefinitely? Would a worm whose mass is half brain be smarter than a human? Is there any actual proof of this theory in current natural observation of closely related species?
I've gotten conflicting stories on that from women...
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Let's Riff on the next Tech/Social Revolution
GrumpyCatFace wrote:So, if you buy the biggest physical processor you can, your computer will be the fastest, right?Speaker to Animals wrote:CPU cycles and RAM capacity seem to have little to do with computing power but it sounds truthy.
CPU cycles and RAM are analogous, between brains of hominids, to more neural connections, especially in the neocortex. The more neurons available for cognition, the more intelligence is possible. A lot of neurons are devoted to muscles and other body controls. It may be that their larger brain size corresponded to more neural connections in their muscles, making them even stronger. You can see this happen in chimps, for example. But I doubt it in their case.
I suspect the reason for our success and their doom had more to do with evolutionary behavior.
I think this was so because we were so genetically compatible. They must have had a neocortex just like we do. We were close enough to interbreed. With that kind of similarity, larger brain size, in my opinion, translated to greater potential for intelligence. If they were otherwise so different, then we should see dramatic differences in brains between Eurasians and Africans, for example, since Eurasians have some percentage of alleles inherited from neanderthals. But we don't.