MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Who will be the Democrat Nominee for POTUS

Poll ended at Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:48 pm

Creepy Joe Biden
5
50%
Bernie 'the Commie' Sanders
1
10%
'Nipple Stud' Cuomo
1
10%
Gavin Newsome
0
No votes
Tulsi Gabbard
2
20%
Sensible Shoes Klobachar - OUT - Karens now for Biden
0
No votes
Hildaghost Clinton
1
10%
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by StCapps » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:39 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:36 pm
StCapps wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:24 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:22 pm


Prosperity lol
Wealthiest nation in history of mankind at it's most wealthy point in it's history, that's prosperity right thur. The only people who think it isn't are SIFCLFs.
Or the 90% that don’t benefit from absurd debt levels and borrowed profits.
Apparently 61% have profited over the last 3 years, and you're just an idiot who wants to believe reality is worse than it really is.

Why does Trump have a 55.7% approval rating (+16.3 spread) on the economy, if 90% don't benefit? More than 10% benefit, that's how.
*yip*

PartyOf5
Posts: 3656
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by PartyOf5 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:54 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:51 pm
And don’t pretend that the 1% of Americans who own stock have any bearing on our general prosperity.
Did you type this really poorly and mean something else, or did you internationally say that only 1% of Americans own stock?

PartyOf5
Posts: 3656
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by PartyOf5 » Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:55 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:07 pm
Picture a billionaire onstage defending capitalism during the greatest period of inequality in history.
High levels of wealth inequality does not mean the non-elites are not well off.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:23 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:55 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:07 pm
Picture a billionaire onstage defending capitalism during the greatest period of inequality in history.
High levels of wealth inequality does not mean the non-elites are not well off.
But a stagnant real income for most Americans for the past thirty years does.

If the wealthy are wealthier because they actually create wealth, then okay. But when they are wealthier because they are exploiting 90% of the population as we have now.. You might have President Bernie.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by Zlaxer » Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:41 pm

Bernie is going to get elected - more proles have nothing to loose than those that do - If he gets elected, and is successful with taxing the shit out of incomes above $100K - I’m going to have a conversation with my boss that i need to be paid enough to make it worth my time despite being ass raped in tax - He’ll probably say he can’t afford it, to which I will say - hello permanent vacation (at least until the country rips itself apart) - I’m sure I’m not the only one thinking like this. It’s not worth it for me to work my ass off if it just goes to Uncle FuCk me in the ass Sam.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25139
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:44 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:54 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:51 pm
And don’t pretend that the 1% of Americans who own stock have any bearing on our general prosperity.
Did you type this really poorly and mean something else, or did you internationally say that only 1% of Americans own stock?
The actual statistic is that 1% of families own 90% of the stock market, but true enough.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by StCapps » Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:57 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:23 pm
PartyOf5 wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:55 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:07 pm
Picture a billionaire onstage defending capitalism during the greatest period of inequality in history.
High levels of wealth inequality does not mean the non-elites are not well off.
But a stagnant real income for most Americans for the past thirty years does.

If the wealthy are wealthier because they actually create wealth, then okay. But when they are wealthier because they are exploiting 90% of the population as we have now.. You might have President Bernie.
Except under Trump real income is going up, and the other thirty years can't be blamed on him.
*yip*

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25139
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:58 pm

StCapps wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:57 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:23 pm
PartyOf5 wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:55 pm

High levels of wealth inequality does not mean the non-elites are not well off.
But a stagnant real income for most Americans for the past thirty years does.

If the wealthy are wealthier because they actually create wealth, then okay. But when they are wealthier because they are exploiting 90% of the population as we have now.. You might have President Bernie.
Except under Trump real income is going up, and the other thirty years can't be blamed on him.
I don’t think the .01% increase in 4 years is going to cut it with voters.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by StCapps » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:18 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:58 pm
StCapps wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:57 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:23 pm


But a stagnant real income for most Americans for the past thirty years does.

If the wealthy are wealthier because they actually create wealth, then okay. But when they are wealthier because they are exploiting 90% of the population as we have now.. You might have President Bernie.
Except under Trump real income is going up, and the other thirty years can't be blamed on him.
I don’t think the .01% increase in 4 years is going to cut it with voters.
They voted for people who gave them less, especially incumbents, so your theory is incorrect, it's pure feelz.
*yip*

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25139
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: MHF Democrat Primary Poll

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:50 pm

StCapps wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:18 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:58 pm
StCapps wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:57 pm
Except under Trump real income is going up, and the other thirty years can't be blamed on him.
I don’t think the .01% increase in 4 years is going to cut it with voters.
They voted for people who gave them less, especially incumbents, so your theory is incorrect, it's pure feelz.
You’re referring to politics pre-Great Recession. Things have changed, dramatically.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0