I'll grant you that the #metoo movement deciding that victims should never be questioned is troubling. I think it is the natural reaction to 50+ years of victims not being believed when they should have been. But I agree that going the complete opposite direction isn't a good decision.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:07 amLol. What power have they gained?
How about destroying your life with lies and facing zero consequences for it.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
guy is Nazi af. Why lie to nomad?Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:39 amYou're excused for not recognizing what Nuke's doing. We have a long history with his posts so know his posting technique. There are others with distinct posting styles (see heydaralon, StA, and DB. Me too.) It's unlikely Nuke subscribes to the words he writes, he simply provides a window into the Alt-Right for our edification & amusement. I don't even know if he is Alt-Right?
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Did you just call someone a name out of the blue? WTF, man, post something real.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:13 amI'll grant you that the #metoo movement deciding that victims should never be questioned is troubling. I think it is the natural reaction to 50+ years of victims not being believed when they should have been. But I agree that going the complete opposite direction isn't a good decision.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:07 amLol. What power have they gained?
How about destroying your life with lies and facing zero consequences for it.
Half of those victims are men.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Do you have any polling to cite for this assertion? Democrats had all the momentum and energy before this and as usual overplayed their hand now it's all but gone. And save it with the "I wont be", for those that don't remember or werent around AmericanNomad is one the original DCF undercover hack bitches.But now that the republicans have ramrodded Kavanaugh in, the democrats will probably win both houses. I won't be voting for them, but people will.
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He's from an age before Dems went Marxist; still has the loyalty but it's misplaced. He's probably on my bus.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
We went from 0 to 60 on incel in the last 2 days.
What changed?
What changed?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Incel is the new boogeyman, these people dont exist. Why does AN know so much about these people if he isnt one? I am convinced incel is like terrorists group taken down by federal agencies. The leadership is undercover feds, membership is undercover local police, and the "true believers" are 1 or 2 individuals with an IQ below 80.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:11 amI'm not blue pill because I haven't voted for a democrat in over ten years, and that was my one and only vote for a democrat in my lifetime.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:02 amBlue pill men have a natural aversion to incels because blue pill men derive their self-worth from women. I think blue pill men are far more pathetic than incels.
Their hate for incels has more to do with their fear of becoming one.
I don't hate incels, I feel bad for them actually. Just like I feel bad for people in poverty. They have a biological need that isn't being taken care of. I want to legalize prostitution to help them drain their balls, so they can think more clearly.
The majority of them do hate women though, as is evident by the posts in their forum. And many of them do have a mental illness, as evidence by how many of them lionize Alek Minassian and Elliott Rodger.
But that isn't all of them, and for the ones who don't advocate violence because they aren't attractive to women, I feel for them.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Oh look at you clubgop. You are all grown up! You even write in complete sentences now, I am so proud of you. Good to see you, friend.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:20 amDo you have any polling to cite for this assertion? Democrats had all the momentum and energy before this and as usual overplayed their hand now it's all but gone. And save it with the "I wont be", for those that don't remember or werent around AmericanNomad is one the original DCF undercover hack bitches.But now that the republicans have ramrodded Kavanaugh in, the democrats will probably win both houses. I won't be voting for them, but people will.
I was never a DNC supporter, even when I was at the DCF. Since I left, I only became more dissatisfied with them. I didn't vote for them even back then because I didn't buy into the whole "lesser of two evils" but I did, in my mind, root for them to win. That was simply because I did think of them as the lesser of two evils, even if I refused to vote for evil (lesser or otherwise).
Since that time, I have come to the conclusion that they are in many ways worse than the GOP. Simply because they pretend to be for peace and equality and whatnot, but they are really warmongers who fight against progressive movements while pretending to champion them. They are like the second Matrix movie: Controlled opposition. And nothing will get better until the party is crushed against the rocks. The fact that they are pushing Debbie Wasserman Schultz after she rigged the primary for Shillary shows how they really feel about progressive movements.
As for my assertion that the Democrats will win in November, I'm sure there are polls supporting my position, but as we both know, polls don't mean shit. The 2016 election proved that much. It is just more that I think the people who ultimately lost (pro-choice democrats) are likely to be stay pissed than the people who ultimately won (pro-life republicans). I could be wrong, of course. The Republicans are typically better at midterms, but the party not in control of the white house also typically does better during midterms. So we will just have to wait and see.
Not that it really matters all that much. Kavanaugh is confirmed and the pipedream of impeachment is a joke. And the Democrats don't push any policies of substance that the Republicans don't, so the election won't really matter unless the hope is for Trump to be impeached, but that will also come back to bite the democrats in the ass when it fails.
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I think the same people who are always talking about incels are the ones against fuck-dolls. 100% of the power women have over men is lust-related; take that away and their one big gun is neutralized.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change