The internet takeover thread

[Speaker to Animals]

Is there an example of someone being censored for criticizing the imams specifically, rather than All Muslims?

Why is that a distinction?

Same reason it's a distinction to blame All Jews for banksters instead of just blaming Jew Banksters.

JP Morgan CEO: Greek Orthodox.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Dimon

Wells Fargo CEO with Scottish surname.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_J._Sloan

CEO of Bank of America is Irish Catholic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Moynihan

I am not going to keep on looking them up.


As far as I can tell, Jews dominate legal and communications professions because their verbal acuity is off the charts and people tend to do what they are good at (hence why Asian and White men dominate tech). Jews really are not better at money management than anybody else.

[Fife]

As far as the legal system is concerned, the Hebrews network like a motherfucker.

If networking is a natural talent, they got it in spades.

[Okeefenokee]

Yaxley Lennon broke reporting restrictions put in place to ensure a fair trial of the accused, he read out a list of names and attributed false charges to them and he broadcasted that they were guilty before the court had come to a decision. All these charges are contempt of court offences.
He has not been found not guilty of these offences and now faces a retrial.

He was not murdered by Muslims in jail as was predicted.

The right wing US media has misrepresented this case from day one and gullible fools with an agenda continue to lap it up and repeat the distortions.

Now I think I will return to only talking about castles as honest civil debate is once again proved to be impossible...

Here's some more lies from this fuckstick

Monty said he wasn't moved to a different prison. He was. He confirmed it once he was released.

Monty said he wasn't moved to a prison with a high muslim population. He was. He confirmed it once he was released.

They moved him from a low muslim population prison to one of the highest in the UK, then they put him in a cell alone across the hall from the prison mosque. The muslims threw shit into his cell every day and told him muslims were on the way to his house to rape his wife.

Lying US media said he was moved at the request of the Muslim home secretary. He wasn't it's not his job that role belongs to the prison minister.
Lying US media said he was transferred to Hull prison, he was not that was where he was sent to by the court.
Lying US media said he was moved to a 70% Muslim prison, no such prison exists.
Lying US media said it was a government plot to have him killed in prison, it was not they even let the convicted of violence, fraudulent arsehole who tried to enter the US under a false identify out of jail.
Lying US media has misrepresented this case from day one in order to push an anti Islamic agenda. Dumb fucks swallow every morsel of shit because it suits their narrative.

Talking about YOU faggot. You and your lies.

[Okeefenokee]

I will state this again, these two support suppression of speech.

They have done so over and over again.

kid fucker defends it when his government is railroading a journalist who dared to report on his government's cover up of thousands of girls raped over decades.

rape defender defends it when citizens are attacked and bludgeoned by terrorists on American streets.

No one should give either of them a second's consideration if they ever try to lie to you and tell you they don't support violent suppression of speech.

We know who they are.

Would you say that your level of intellect is typical of our armed forces?

Go bother someone else, coward.

[SuburbanFarmer]

See, this where others might brush a guy like Okee aside, and ignore him. But I appreciate his type. We need them. We need guys that can be pointed at a target and sent. Somebody has to be ready to go over the top and distract the machine guns for us.

[Okeefenokee]

You do understand that when the dust clears from this, you won't be a citizen anymore, don't you?

Whoever wins this, they are going to strip cowards like you of everything.

[SuburbanFarmer]

You do understand that when the dust clears from this, you won't be a citizen anymore, don't you?

Whoever wins this, they are going to strip cowards like you of everything.

You’ll need to link together a few more dots for me there, but ok.

[Speaker to Animals]

If things keep going at current trajectory, there will be civil war and governmental collapse around the world. Militaries will take over to restore order and undo the damage that democracy has wrought. Most likely, "enfranchisement" will be limited to the warrior class. In America that likely will be a class with an open door policy, but most of you still would not serve just to get your vote. That is why we are headed down this road.

Government composed of non-warriors was always a bad idea at the sovereign level. Democracy is fine when limited to smaller, local issues.

[SuburbanFarmer]

If things keep going at current trajectory, there will be civil war and governmental collapse around the world. Militaries will take over to restore order and undo the damage that democracy has wrought. Most likely, "enfranchisement" will be limited to the warrior class. In America that likely will be a class with an open door policy, but most of you still would not serve just to get your vote. That is why we are headed down this road.

Government composed of non-warriors was always a bad idea at the sovereign level. Democracy is fine when limited to smaller, local issues.

Meh, fair enough. Really no point in voting between 2 corrupt representatives anyway. Enjoy!

[Speaker to Animals]

If things keep going at current trajectory, there will be civil war and governmental collapse around the world. Militaries will take over to restore order and undo the damage that democracy has wrought. Most likely, "enfranchisement" will be limited to the warrior class. In America that likely will be a class with an open door policy, but most of you still would not serve just to get your vote. That is why we are headed down this road.

Government composed of non-warriors was always a bad idea at the sovereign level. Democracy is fine when limited to smaller, local issues.

Meh, fair enough. Really no point in voting between 2 corrupt representatives anyway. Enjoy!

It would be exponentially better than this.

People ought not have the right to "vote" in elections that have life and death outcomes in terms of war if they are not themselves willing to fight in the wars. Voting means you share in sovereignty, and a sovereign who is unwilling to fight his own wars deserves to be strangled in his sleep by the praetorians.

I will say it again: if all those people who voted for Hillary Clinton, upon her election, would have to plausibly (with a realistic probability of it happening) get drafted to go fight all her wars for her, she wouldn't receive even 10% of their votes. That's a huge problem. That's the fatal flaw of American democracy and it has to stop.