Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:11 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 6:45 am
So now un-named sources are OK again?
Or is it only when it suits you?
They are only unnamed thecause the Comittee Democrats realize it won’t fit their victim narrative.

Shocking I know... huh?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:18 am

Double standards BS.
Either un-named sources are never viable or sometimes they are.
Pick ONE.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:25 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:18 am
Double standards BS.
Either un-named sources are never viable or sometimes they are.
Pick ONE.
Ahh, there is a difference here. They are being investigated as credible becfore becoming public information.

Just like Dr. Ford was meant to be... shocking isn’t it?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:31 am

Honestly, nothing shocks me any more about the circus that is US politics.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:32 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:31 am
Honestly, nothing shocks me any more about the circus that is US politics.
If the rule of the committees were followed by the Democrat members, this never would have happened.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:54 am

If brains were made of gunpowder you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:15 am

This whole farce was the most vile spectacle in the Senate since a democrat tried murder another lawmaker more than a century ago.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:49 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:54 am
If brains were made of gunpowder you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose...
Really? Then explain this...

#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:51 am

Oh, and a side note, don’t comment about shit you don’t understand, we know it’s hard, since you have diarrhea or the brain which goes straight to your mouth...and straight onto the keyboard for us to all be abused by, but at least try.
Last edited by The Conservative on Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by MilSpecs » Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:53 am

The Conservative wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:07 am
MilSpecs wrote:
Sat Sep 29, 2018 6:47 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Sep 28, 2018 7:29 pm


Some states will stay blue because the population are fucking morons. It doesn’t matter if they find blood on the hands of their representative, they will still vote blue.

Kennedy, and Mass, as well as Feinstein and California are perfect examples of both instances.
Don't you still live in Massachusetts?
Yeah, and no matter how many time Republicans in the state go out to vote, the state is fucking blue.
And if it turns red it won’t be a place where you want to live anymore. You are just the same as most of us in the affluent blue states: you get good schools, low crime rates, high salaries, beaches and state parks, fun and relatively safe cities, major medical centers, tranquil suburbs, tourist and college towns, and all the amenities money and education has come to expect. Travel and see what you get in places where it’s every man for himself. Then tell me if you want to live there.
:royalty-queen: