The Conservative wrote:Oh really?Speaker to Animals wrote:The Conservative wrote:
You out of all people should know the answer to that.
The answer is no. If there is no history, then you cannot repeat it.
History is its own thing. It's not really like hitting the rewind button on time at all. You might be able to say people repeated some past events that we no longer know anything about, but to repeat history, you need to have some kind of history to repeat. History is not the thing in itself. To confuse it with the past is like confusing the Mona Lisa with whatever prostitute Da Vinci paid to sit there for the painting before boning her.
How many civilizations have destroyed themselves because of the same thing over, and over, and over again? Just because they didn't know about the other cultures didn't mean it didn't exist.
You are confusing the past with history. History is the way individuals and societies perceive and interpret the past. The past is whatever happened. It's not really possible for us to objectively see the past. We have to paint a representation of it, which we invariably do through the formation of narratives derived from our individual biases, and that representation is no more one and the same with the past than a painting is with the subject of the painting.