So what, you should only prosecute speeding drivers if they cause an accident?
You shouldn't stop crazy gunmen taking assault rifles into schools until after they start shooting?
Can you not think of any examples of stopping a minor crime to prevent a much bigger crime?
Can you honestly say that hate speech against Muslims doesn't lead to Mosques getting shot up?
??
None of the above are related to the spoken word. Also, we don't prosecute speeders. If a driver kills someone with their car, we prosecute, regardless of what speed they were driving.
As to the crazy gunmen.... it is legal to ban guns from certain types of locations. Your second amendment right doesn't apply everywhere you want to go. Very similar to the right of free speech. You can't spew anywhere you want. There are places where your free speech rights don't apply.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
I'm getting pretty offended by all the people needing to feel offended all the time. It's becoming a way of life for some people. I can't imagine a life filled with searching through every syllable, looking for a way to proclaim how offended I am.
How about we just let assholes be assholes?
If someone offends you, you simply need to stop listening, watching, reading or having tea with that person. Your problem is instantly solved.
I'm sure Goebbels said just the same about all those snowflake Jews complaining about being vilified.
I mean, what's the worst thing that could happen when you allow racists to preach their hate without consequence?
You think banning free speech would have prevented the holocaust? Damn you're delusional.
Goebbels practically invented Grievance Farming, the Jewish Bolshevik Conspiracy is the mother of all Grievance Farms.
Postby Speaker to Animals » Thu May 09, 2019 1:23 pm
We do in fact prosecute speeders. When you sign the ticket and hand in your fine, you just submit to default judgment. If you so choose, you can go to the courthouse and fight your case.
Speeding is illegal because it endangers other people and property.
Speaking is not illegal because it doesn't endanger anybody. Nukedog calling this royal welfare recipient a nigger is not hurting anybody. It might be offensive, but it literally harms nobody.
And let's not pretend like Euros in general are the pinnacle of civilization any longer. The good genes crossed the Atlantic a long time ago.
So what, you should only prosecute speeding drivers if they cause an accident?
You shouldn't stop crazy gunmen taking assault rifles into schools until after they start shooting?
Can you not think of any examples of stopping a minor crime to prevent a much bigger crime?
Can you honestly say that hate speech against Muslims doesn't lead to Mosques getting shot up?
??
None of the above are related to the spoken word. Also, we don't prosecute speeders. If a driver kills someone with their car, we prosecute, regardless of what speed they were driving.
As to the crazy gunmen.... it is legal to ban guns from certain types of locations. Your second amendment right doesn't apply everywhere you want to go. Very similar to the right of free speech. You can't spew anywhere you want. There are places where your free speech rights don't apply.
You prosecute speeders to prevent road deaths.
Likewise, we prosecute hate speech to prevent hate crimes.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
We do in fact prosecute speeders. When you sign the ticket and hand in your fine, you just submit to default judgment. If you so choose, you can go to the courthouse and fight your case.
Got it. My mistake.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
What the intellectual elites are embracing, is the arm of decision for the National Socialists.
Eventually the worm will turn, then the Grievance Farming will be directed against the very people it is ostensibly protecting, Jews, Gypsies (Migrants) and Intellectuals will become the hunted rather than the hunters.
So what, you should only prosecute speeding drivers if they cause an accident?
You shouldn't stop crazy gunmen taking assault rifles into schools until after they start shooting?
Can you not think of any examples of stopping a minor crime to prevent a much bigger crime?
Can you honestly say that hate speech against Muslims doesn't lead to Mosques getting shot up?
??
None of the above are related to the spoken word. Also, we don't prosecute speeders. If a driver kills someone with their car, we prosecute, regardless of what speed they were driving.
As to the crazy gunmen.... it is legal to ban guns from certain types of locations. Your second amendment right doesn't apply everywhere you want to go. Very similar to the right of free speech. You can't spew anywhere you want. There are places where your free speech rights don't apply.
You prosecute speeders to prevent road deaths.
Likewise, we prosecute hate speech to prevent hate crimes.
It doesn't prevent hate crimes, it just makes knee jerk censorship cunts feel like they are, results be damned. Smitty is right, censoring the far-right leads to a Nazi backlash where the same tactics used to try and suppress the Nazi's are turned against those trying to suppress them. You are inviting more hate crimes with your nonsense and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Empowering fascists and restricting free speech, two birds with one stone, idiotic nanny state faggotry for the fail.
None of the above are related to the spoken word. Also, we don't prosecute speeders. If a driver kills someone with their car, we prosecute, regardless of what speed they were driving.
As to the crazy gunmen.... it is legal to ban guns from certain types of locations. Your second amendment right doesn't apply everywhere you want to go. Very similar to the right of free speech. You can't spew anywhere you want. There are places where your free speech rights don't apply.
You prosecute speeders to prevent road deaths.
Likewise, we prosecute hate speech to prevent hate crimes.
It doesn't prevent hate crimes, it just makes knee jerk censorship cunts feel like they are, results be damned. Smitty is right, censoring the far-right leads to a Nazi backlash, you are inviting more hate crimes with your nonsense and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Right, 'cos no one has ever been radicalised by watching endless ISIS videos preaching hate against the West.
derp
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
You prosecute speeders to prevent road deaths.
Likewise, we prosecute hate speech to prevent hate crimes.
It doesn't prevent hate crimes, it just makes knee jerk censorship cunts feel like they are, results be damned. Smitty is right, censoring the far-right leads to a Nazi backlash, you are inviting more hate crimes with your nonsense and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Right, 'cos no one has ever been radicalised by watching endless ISIS videos preaching hate against the West.
derp
Banning it would lead to them seeking out the videos even more often, and radicalize even more people, so banning free speech doesn't solve that problem, dumbass. You are empowering ISIS and the far-right by restricting their right to free speech, not disempowering them.
You only care about feeling like you are helping, results of your supported policies be damned. As long as you feel better, that's all that matters to you.
It doesn't prevent hate crimes, it just makes knee jerk censorship cunts feel like they are, results be damned. Smitty is right, censoring the far-right leads to a Nazi backlash, you are inviting more hate crimes with your nonsense and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Right, 'cos no one has ever been radicalised by watching endless ISIS videos preaching hate against the West.
derp
Banning it would lead to them seeking out the videos even more often, and radicalize even more people, so banning free speech doesn't solve that problem, dumbass. You are empowering ISIS and the far-right by restricting their right to free speech, not disempowering them.
You only care about feeling like you are helping, results of your supported policies be damned. As long as you feel better, that's all that matters to you.
If you say so.
I don't know where I'd be without you to tell me what matters to me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
