Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

[K@th]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

[StCapps]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Convenient that Dan Carlin deleted the proof, to protect his brand, because he too didn't care about free speech when push came to shove. Hiding behind that when we all remember your bullshit Strangelove pedophile theory, you aren't fooling, except maybe yourself and those who didn't see that thread. Everyone else knows what you did, and how censoring people for the same shit now, is laughable hypocrisy on your part. Being less descriptive than clubgop doesn't get you off the hook, that's just your bullshit rationale to excuse your nonsense moderation.

[K@th]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Convenient that Dan Carlin deleted the proof, to protect his brand, because he too didn't care about free speech when push came to shove

Happy researching! https://web.archive.org/web/20150308201 ... um.php?f=9

[StCapps]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Convenient that Dan Carlin deleted the proof, to protect his brand, because he too didn't care about free speech when push came to shove

Happy researching! https://web.archive.org/web/20150308201 ... um.php?f=9

You know we didn't save the thread, and most of the shit on the forum got deleted, coward. We remember Kath, you aren't fooling anyone but yourself.

[K@th]

So you got no proof except DSL's word? Ok, seems legit.

[StCapps]

So you got no proof except DSL's word? Ok, seems legit.

I remember Kath, it's not just DSL's word. You can pretend all you want, you are only fooling yourself, if that is even working.

[K@th]

So you got no proof except DSL's word? Ok, seems legit.

I remember Kath, it's not just DSL's word. You can pretend all you want, you are only fooling yourself, if that is even working.

Your ability to remember is as good as your ability to translate people's own words into something they didn't say, so there's that.

We have you and DSL making this claim. Since neither of you are credible, you'll need a bit more evidence. Or, you could start a poll. That totally went your way last time.

[StCapps]

That totally went your way last time.

It did. The only way I wouldn't have won, is if you won in crushing landslide. The poll wasn't "Is Kath a good moderator?", the poll was "Has Kath done such a shitty job that she shouldn't be moderator?", any significant chunk of votes against you is a vicious indictment of your moderation of this forum.

[Montegriffo]

That totally went your way last time.

It did. The only way I wouldn't have won, is if you won in crushing landslide. The poll wasn't "Is Kath a good moderator?", the poll was "Has Kath done such a shitty job that she shouldn't be moderator?", any significant chunk of votes against you is a vicious indictment of your moderation of this forum.

Almost two to one in favour of Kath staying moderator, that's pretty conclusive compared to Brexit or Trump's election victory.

[Fife]

It's a bullshit question for a bullshit poll. The "votes," such as they are, are meaningless.