It would hurt California, no question. As it holds 12% of the population, ~18% of the Federal government's revenue, almost all of the Summer fruits, and vegetables, has 5% of the national oil production, and by itself is the 8th largest economy in the world, the rest of the country would also suffer.TheOneX wrote:Unlikely, California benefits way more from free trade with the rest of the states than the other way around. Yeah, California is the biggest dog in the pack, but it is still only 1 of 50. Most of what California produces are luxury items. California doesn't produce coal, it doesn't produce oil, it has a single car plant. If California broke off from the US without a good trade agreement, its economy would collapse almost immediately.jbird4049 wrote:A lot poorer too.TheOneX wrote:
It would be a lot more sensible, and a lot less extreme.
Anyone who thinks California leaving would significantly hurt the US economy does not understand the economics of the situation. Sure you would see recession, but it would recover. Most businesses and individuals would find themselves with more economic freedom with fewer regulations to follow.
Also most of the stuff coming from Asia comes via Long Beach and Oakland.
And you dope fiends, and winos, don't forget California also is a major supplier.