The Left Does not Reason

[Speaker to Animals]

A few compared to the slightly more than 50% of the voting public who voted against Trump.
We are talking about dozens here and extrapolating this into "the left does not reason".
How many people at that rally did not take part in violence? Most of them, that's how many.

That's not correct. These people numbered in the hundreds, and that was just one event. They have been doing this in cities across the nation. Nor are they independent actors. We know from Project Veritas investigations that the democratic party actually contracts these thugs out. They were caught paying for and bussing in these radicals to Chicago to create a riot at the UIC campus during a Trump rally there.



In the race riot in Charlotte last year, the police chief stated that probably 70% of the people they arrested were not even from the state of North Carolina. They were bussed in. These people don't have money. Somebody pays them to do this and pays to bus them in to the locations..

An activist who bragged about disrupting multiple Donald Trump campaign events in a recent Project Veritas video was on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign payroll, a search of Federal Election Commission (FEC) records reveals.

In a Veritas video released Monday, filmmaker and provocateur James O’Keefe recounts meeting activist Zulema Rodriguez at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. In the video, Rodriguez takes credit for violent protests in Chicago that forced Trump to cancel a March rally.

“So, [Aaron Black] and I did the Chicago Trump event where we shut down like all the yeah,” Rodriguez says in the video. Rodriguez also takes credit for an Arizona protest, also in March, that shut down a major highway outside a Trump event.
Notably, a search of FEC records reveals that Rodriguez was paid by the Clinton campaign shortly before she disrupted the Chicago rally. The campaign paid her $1,610.34 as a “payroll” expense, and also gave her a $30 payment that is described only as “phone.”

The payments are both dated Feb. 29, 2016, less than two weeks before the violence in Chicago. Those are the only payments Rodriguez has ever received from the Clinton campaign. It’s not immediately clear what the payment was for, and it’s also unclear whether Rodriguez was really behind the agitation in Chicago or if she was simply making an empty boast.

In the months afterward, Rodriguez was paid handsomely by other political operations. She received a $1,108.97 travel reimbursement from MoveOn.org Political Action in May, and in June she was paid a whopping $17,500 by Stand Up For Ohio PAC as a “political consulting fee.” Stand Up For Ohio PAC is itself heavily funded by MoveOn.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/activ ... s-payroll/



This isn't a few people. It's thousands of people. It's not just a few places. This has been happening nationwide for over a year now. Nor is this some fringe group. These are militants funded and trained by the democratic party through their contracting firms.

This is technically terrorism, Monty, and it's being funded and perpetrated by the democratic party.

[Xenophon]

Naturally, ALL Liberals aren't non-reasoning poopie faces, but the majority of Leftist political activists are, in fact, non-reasoning poopie faces.

[Montegriffo]

Those are the only payments Rodriguez has ever received from the Clinton campaign. It’s not immediately clear what the payment was for, and it’s also unclear whether Rodriguez was really behind the agitation in Chicago or if she was simply making an empty boast.

Do you even read the things you post?

[SuburbanFarmer]

Naturally, ALL Liberals aren't non-reasoning poopie faces, but the majority of Leftist political activists are, in fact, non-reasoning poopie faces.

Just as long as it's enough of them to justify StA's political cleansing.. They're not human, after all.

[Xenophon]

Naturally, ALL Liberals aren't non-reasoning poopie faces, but the majority of Leftist political activists are, in fact, non-reasoning poopie faces.

Just as long as it's enough of them to justify StA's political cleansing.. They're not human, after all.

StA advocates violence when confronted with violence, as far as I can tell. No need for "cleansing" hyperbole.

[C-Mag]

The KKK formed as a reaction against progressive liberals kicking their ass and freeing their slaves. Are you actually confusing the terms Democrat and Republican with right and left? Look at the geography and you'll understand the cultural divides of right and left are largely region based, not party affiliation, and it's been this way since the Civil War. Southerners are Conservative leaning, Northerners are Liberal. That's why the KKK began in the South, that's why they identified themselves as conservatives, and that's why they are widely considered an extreme right-wing group in all their manifestations throughout history.

And Fife, don't be so easily fooled by this charlatan, he has outright said on this site that he's going be intellectually dishonest to make the left look bad. And look how well it's working.

Racism is not geographically based. Boston is and has been one of the most racist locations in the US. There is no question, the Democrats are the party of racism in the US. They have a nearly unbroken line of over 150 years of racism. From Tammany Hall to the Clintons.

Today the Democrats are generally considered synonymous with the Left in America. Philosophically this is wrong. The Left historically being used to denote someone being for change and egalitarianism. Conservatives for the status quo and the old definition doesn't make much sense today as it was based on a Monarchy. Both the Dems and the GOP have been for the Status Quo for decades. And that status quo is an ever increasing power of the Central Government.

When Lincoln and the GOP won the Whitehouse in 1860 the Democrats did not accept the election results and immediately went about preparing for Secession, which they had in place by February even before Lincoln was inaugurated. The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. In order of precedence the targets of the KKK were, 1. Republicans 2. Blacks 3. Catholics 4. Jews. The Democrats passed all the Jim Crow Laws, Poll Taxes, etc. The Dems fought Civil Rights from 1865 on, and only capitulated 100 years later. The Dems loved then and still love today Woodrow Wilson, who established Segregation as US Government Policy and set us back in race relations 50-75 years. And this is where the modern Left/Democrats/Progressives really show their true colors. Their love of folks like Woodrow Wilson. When BLM protesters got it right and went after Wilsons sainthood at Princeton, the University cut a deal with BLM to keep their Icon in place. The modern Liberals/Dems/Progressives show as little real concern for minorities today as they did at the turn of the century. The minority murder rate in Chicago is a prime example how power White leaders turn a blind eye to the plight of minorities they represent.

As to the prime question of this thread, The Left does not Reason, StA is correct. Call the modern Left what you like. Democrats/Liberals/Progressives, they are the same people. They are intolerant, self important and power hungry. When they lose power they become violent. The modern folks that call themselves AntiFa would very much be at home in the 1870s KKK.

[C-Mag]

Conservatives go into hiding from the Black Shirts
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/0 ... ir-safety/

Some of us in this thread believe so called conservatives are the ones causing most of the violence, others believe it's so called liberals.

Please explain your logic

I do know that in a nation of over 300,000,000 people you are going to find violent idiots being violent idiots, so we could spend all day long, every day of the year finding new wonderful examples of stupid, violent, intolerance from all sides at the same time.

No, intolerance and violence is not from all sides. The violence and intolerance comes from the Left/Dems/Progs. And further more, the leaders of the Left/Dems/Progs support and endorse the violence and intolerance.

Our Nation is being transformed into a police state, an actual God Damn police state from decades of collective effort from both parties. Yes, I think one party is very slightly less poisonously vile than the other, but it's like a choice between Ebola or the Black Death.

WTF ? What does this have to do with the topic. If it was such a police state why were there ZERO arrests at the Berkeley Riots ?

Which vial of vileness should I take? Which vial should you take? Would it matter? Who gives a fuck?

Each time we have elections, we may get a "change" of political parties, but despite the different packaging, the results are always the same old, same old.

More corruption, more poverty, and a growing police state.

And here we are spending time arguing over which supposed side has the most assholes. What am I saying? I'm doing that too.

Yeah, same old same old. Left/Dems/Progs don't get their way and they take violence to the streets.

[C-Mag]

Naturally, ALL Liberals aren't non-reasoning poopie faces, but the majority of Leftist political activists are, in fact, non-reasoning poopie faces.

Clearly it's not all. But their leaders support the street violence and intolerance. While there are plenty of Lefties who are reasonable folks, they don't carry any weight and have no voice. Look what's going on here we have tons of Lefty leaders from Hollywood supporting these violent protests, and calling for everything from more protests, to assassination, secession and military coups. What we here little of is reason and any kind of non-violent resolution to differences.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Naturally, ALL Liberals aren't non-reasoning poopie faces, but the majority of Leftist political activists are, in fact, non-reasoning poopie faces.

Just as long as it's enough of them to justify StA's political cleansing.. They're not human, after all.

StA advocates violence when confronted with violence, as far as I can tell. No need for "cleansing" hyperbole.

My mistake. In this particular thread, it was Nuke and Okee calling for liberals to be dropped out of helicopters. StA has actually avoided the the political genocide angle in this thread. I could pull up 5 others where he did though, if it helps.

[Speaker to Animals]

Those are the only payments Rodriguez has ever received from the Clinton campaign. It’s not immediately clear what the payment was for, and it’s also unclear whether Rodriguez was really behind the agitation in Chicago or if she was simply making an empty boast.

Do you even read the things you post?

Then what did they pay her for if not for the riot? Do you even bother to read the whole thing or do you quote mine it and not bother reading the surrounding context?

This is the person who organized the violent riot on the UIC campus and she was paid a large sum of money by the Clinton campaign right before she organized it..