Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25390
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Speaker to Animals wrote:I think, jokes aside, a NSFW rule is worthwhile to consider. It doesn't take much to put that tag on something, and we don't want people losing their jobs over our free speech.
This.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by TheReal_ND »

I always did that anyway. I don't embed NSFW images and I put a disclaimer on the links.
User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by pineapplemike »

NSFW

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by Speaker to Animals »

pineapplemike wrote:NSFW

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Image

Technically safe if you took physics for scientists and engineers in college.
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by TheReal_ND »

He's not tied off. Even if he wasn't already violating OSHA regs with the ladder stunt. Ladders aren't made to take side loads either.
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by C-Mag »

TheReal_ND wrote:He's not tied off. Even if he wasn't already violating OSHA regs with the ladder stunt. Ladders aren't made to take side loads either.

Doesn't matter, there are plenty of cheap replacements sneaking across the border
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by Speaker to Animals »

TheReal_ND wrote:He's not tied off. Even if he wasn't already violating OSHA regs with the ladder stunt. Ladders aren't made to take side loads either.

It's not a side load. It's maybe (at most) ten degrees off the angle at which it was designed to be used. The force vector from the stand side of the ladder is pretty much the same as it would be if used on a level ground as well. The only real safety issue is whether the main ladder leg is securely fixed to the ledge.
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by TheReal_ND »

Anything beyond the 1:3 ratio is unduly stressing the ladder for side loads it wasn't engineered for. He's clearly out of warranty.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by Speaker to Animals »

TheReal_ND wrote:Anything beyond the 1:3 ratio is unduly stressing the ladder for side loads it wasn't engineered for. He's clearly out of warranty.

You made that shit up. It's clearly (at most) about ten degrees acute from it's designed angle of use.
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Wew Lads! JRE + AJ

Post by Okeefenokee »

Speaker to Animals wrote:Technically safe if you took physics for scientists and engineers in college.
I just had this argument in the kitchen changing a lightbulb on an extension ladder the other day. I've painted many stairwells just like that. It's the standard method.

/edit, unless you're in yankee land where the unions are, but that ain't the case here.
Last edited by Okeefenokee on Fri Feb 10, 2017 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751