Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
What was Bjorn's again?
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
True story.MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
When you subsidize bad parenting by only one gender, you will end up with a fuck ton of bad parents from that gender, as we now see with the plague of single motherhood, which by definition is bad parenting.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
https://www.reference.com/science/eats- ... 169284bbe9Fife wrote:Well I'm certainly on board with all that.Kath wrote:My wet dream for SCOTUS is to make the 4th Amendment relevant again. And civil forfeiture must die.
One of the uncountable losses of the destruction of the DCF was the links I worked up on the Mosaic Theory.
Your 4th amendment is on life 12.75, or thereabouts.
Scientists are making genetically modified cyborg dragonflies
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Well, the nomination is coming Tuesday now.
Trump cold re-animate O.W. Holmes, Jr., nominate him, and the DNC would call him Judge Hitler. It mattes not who he appoints.
So, the really interesting dynamic becomes the Turtle and the neocons vs. Trump on whether to "go nuclear."
The most interesting stuff so far is right around the corner.
I have doubts about how "sure" it is to go nuclear, at least in Round One.
Why the Supreme Court fight is sure to go nuclear
Trump cold re-animate O.W. Holmes, Jr., nominate him, and the DNC would call him Judge Hitler. It mattes not who he appoints.
So, the really interesting dynamic becomes the Turtle and the neocons vs. Trump on whether to "go nuclear."
The most interesting stuff so far is right around the corner.
I have doubts about how "sure" it is to go nuclear, at least in Round One.
Why the Supreme Court fight is sure to go nuclear
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:True story.MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
Not according to the US Judicial System. Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
That's total horseshit, Kath. You are talking about men giving up and losing their children after losing everything. I have been through the process. the judge will NEVER just make a decision like that in a contested divorce. It will drag on for years and year, and the man will have to pay all legal fees, until he is destitute and can no longer defend himself. Then it's over.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sorry, I'm not a lawyer. Can you translate below?Fife wrote: Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.
http://www.newsweek.com/divorce-new-rul ... tody-83545Courts are changing as well; in the small percentage (5 percent) of custody cases that do go to litigation, judges are now more inclined to disregard gender and look at who's the better parent, says Gary Nickelson, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. "
Account abandoned.