Literal Odds and Ends

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25231
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:54 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Daycare is what we should subsidize for single mothers. Abolish all that other stuff and give them day care and vocational training.
Subsidizing it would just create daycare megacorps, just like every other industry.

See: corn, autos, insurance, etc.

The prices are completely outrageous though. Not sure what can be done about it.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:58 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Daycare is what we should subsidize for single mothers. Abolish all that other stuff and give them day care and vocational training.
Subsidizing it would just create daycare megacorps, just like every other industry.

See: corn, autos, insurance, etc.

The prices are completely outrageous though. Not sure what can be done about it.

Yep. It would have some negative consequences for sure, but nothing like rewarding women for becoming single mothers..

Instead of handing them money, you just take care of their kids while they go to work. No food stamps. No welfare. No rent subsidies. Nada nada nada. The message to young women should be: don't fuck it up, we aren't going to give you shit.

Women seem to want gender equality and I aim to give it to them.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Okeefenokee » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:06 pm

Make the welfare daycare a pain in the ass too. Something like the DMV, so you're motivated to get to where you pay for your own damn shit on your phone, rather than the weekly hassle of getting your dollars converted to wampum, because that's how the welfare office makes you pay your bill.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:59 am

Here is a head-scratcher for Monty:

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/02/ ... mpionship/


This girl can't compete against boys because she is a girl, but she is taking steroids and HGH to grow muscles like a man. Should she be allowed to compete at all while she is on PEDs?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18715
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:35 pm

No.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:40 pm

Montegriffo wrote:No.

So should all women who undergo that kind of hormone regimen be banned from playing sports since it by design pumps them full of growth hormone and steroids?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18715
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:48 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:No.

So should all women who undergo that kind of hormone regimen be banned from playing sports since it by design pumps them full of growth hormone and steroids?
Depends on the regulations of each sport individually. According to your article the rules state that she can only compete as the gender she was born and clearly she would be breaking the rules by taking male hormones and steroids. If she were allowed to compete as a male then she would have to get approval by the governing body to continue using hormones and steroids.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:51 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:No.

So should all women who undergo that kind of hormone regimen be banned from playing sports since it by design pumps them full of growth hormone and steroids?
Depends on the regulations of each sport individually. According to your article the rules state that she can only compete as the gender she was born and clearly she would be breaking the rules by taking male hormones and steroids. If she were allowed to compete as a male then she would have to get approval by the governing body to continue using hormones and steroids.

Forget the other rule. I am asking you if a transgender person who is on steroids and HGH should be allowed to compete at all.

User avatar
skankhunt42
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:54 pm

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by skankhunt42 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:52 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Daycare is what we should subsidize for single mothers. Abolish all that other stuff and give them day care and vocational training.
Subsidizing it would just create daycare megacorps, just like every other industry.

See: corn, autos, insurance, etc.

The prices are completely outrageous though. Not sure what can be done about it.

Yep. It would have some negative consequences for sure, but nothing like rewarding women for becoming single mothers..

Instead of handing them money, you just take care of their kids while they go to work. No food stamps. No welfare. No rent subsidies. Nada nada nada. The message to young women should be: don't fuck it up, we aren't going to give you shit.

Women seem to want gender equality and I aim to give it to them.
Fucking PLUS ONE
"just realize that our Welfare states are also propped up by your Warfare. You're not actually defending us from threats, but you are propping us up by fabricating threats to maintain the Perpetual War." - Smitty

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18715
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Literal Odds and Ends

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:30 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:

So should all women who undergo that kind of hormone regimen be banned from playing sports since it by design pumps them full of growth hormone and steroids?
Depends on the regulations of each sport individually. According to your article the rules state that she can only compete as the gender she was born and clearly she would be breaking the rules by taking male hormones and steroids. If she were allowed to compete as a male then she would have to get approval by the governing body to continue using hormones and steroids.

Forget the other rule. I am asking you if a transgender person who is on steroids and HGH should be allowed to compete at all.
As I said, she would need to seek approval from the ruling body and receive a medical exemption.

The IAAF is currently reviewing it's policy on high levels of testosterone in female athletes.
The IAAF policy on hyperandrogenism, or high natural levels of testosterone in women, was suspended following the case of Dutee Chand v. Athletics Federation of India (AFI) & The International Association of Athletics Federations, in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided in July 2015.[61] The ruling found that there was a lack of evidence provided that testosterone increased female athletic performance and notified the IAAF that it had two years to provide the evidence
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image