Another School Shooting

[StCapps]

(1) You are just some pothead in Canada.

(2) The only contact you have with your equivalent of a deputy sheriff is hiding your weed in your underoos when you get pulled over for running a stop sign.

Attacking the man and not the argument, not very convincing, you're gonna need more than that.

(3) I am not committing an ad hominem attack. I am insultingly pointing out to you that (A) I have quite a bit more history and experience with Florida deputy sheriffs than you do, and (B) your "argument" -- if one could call it that -- was that in your personal judgment it's more believable that four out of four deputies chickened out when the time came to engage an active shooter. But in the case of (B), you are in fact just some pothead from Canada. Your personal judgment means fuck all. The personal judgment of a drug abuser is not worth much. Do you understand that? You need an actual argument here to back this up. Nowhere did you provide any argument as to why one should believe this over any other hypothesis.

Right now, I have to choose between the personal judgment of a drug abuser who is probably high right now as he posts his "argument", or parsimony. Parsimony wins for now. I don't rule out the possibility that all four deputies simply chickened out. I simply find it quite unbelievable at this juncture.

So anecdotal projection being used to appeal to yourself as an authority and attacking the judgement of anyone on pot, what a compelling argument.

[Speaker to Animals]

No genius. I gave you an argument for why one hypothesis is more likely than the other. Go detox.

[StCapps]

No genius. I gave you an argument for why one hypothesis is more likely than the other. Go detox.

Right and I agreed with that long ago. Your insistence that all other hypothesis are unbelievable is what I take issue with. Not that you can tell since you have no reading comprehension skills. Shitty Sheriff is the most likely explanation, but Shitty Deputies is the second most likely explanation.

[Speaker to Animals]

I said I personally find the assertion that the four responding deputies would turn cowards to be unbelievable. I was given no reason to believe it either. All the evidence we have now points towards the sheriff, dude. Have another toke, I guess.

[StCapps]

I said I personally find the assertion that the four responding deputies would turn cowards to be unbelievable. I was given no reason to believe it either. All the evidence we have now points towards the sheriff, dude. Have another toke, I guess.

Well you personal belief that four deputies in the same place can't be shit, I find that to be laughable, there are plenty of shitty deputies. You finding it unbelievable is irrelevant because it's totally believable. It's not as believable as a Shitty Sheriff, but that doesn't make it unbelievable.

[Okeefenokee]

I said I personally find the assertion that the four responding deputies would turn cowards to be unbelievable. I was given no reason to believe it either. All the evidence we have now points towards the sheriff, dude. Have another toke, I guess.

Well you personal belief that four deputies in the same place can't be shit, I find that to be laughable, there are plenty of shitty deputies. You finding it unbelievable is irrelevant because it's totally believable. It's not as believable as a Shitty Sheriff, but that doesn't make it unbelievable.

THEN

WHY

DID

HE

HIDE

THE

TRUTH?

When it was reported that the one cop was outside, he came out publicly and denounced him, and then the cop was forced to resign. When the sheriff made that statement, he already knew there were three other cops out there that the public didn't know about, and he didn't say a word.

If it was four shitty cops, and not the one shitty sheriff that was responsible, he would have spoke out against all four, not just the one, and he would have had all four of their badges, not just the one the public knew about. And he for damned sure wouldn't have concealed what happened.

You theory does not fit with what actually happened.

[StCapps]

THEN

WHY

DID

HE

HIDE

THE

TRUTH?

To cover for them when he knows he's going down for being shit too. Who knows? Maybe get a better imagination. Maybe he's pulling a Cedric Daniels, covering for Prezbo, Carver and Herc, taking care of his troops. It's all speculation of course, but it's not hard to imagine a scenario where deputies fuck up in the line of duty, especially in an emergency.

[Okeefenokee]

THEN

WHY

DID

HE

HIDE

THE

TRUTH?

To cover for them when he knows he's going down for being shit too. Who knows? Maybe get a better imagination. Maybe he's pulling a Cedric Daniels, covering for Prezbo, Carver and Herc.

1. Simplest explanation

2. Imagination

You can only pick one.

[StCapps]

1. Simplest explanation

2. Imagination

You can only pick one.

1)
Next. Shitty Deputies is not unbelievable, even though Shitty Sheriff is more likely. Hell maybe it's both. If you think Shitty Deputies is an impossibility given the facts we do know, then your imagination sucks.
/shrugs

[clubgop]

Wow you guys get weird when your narrative is fucked with.

Don’t know what a GRVO is, and StA is playing coy with an unknown theory.

You don't know what it is because you didn't the read the fucking article you posted. Gun Violence Restraining order.

Felons, the dangerously mentally ill, perpetrators of domestic violence — these people have not only demonstrated their unfitness to own a weapon, they’ve been granted due process to contest the charges or claims against them. There is no arbitrary state action. There is no collective punishment. There is, rather, an individual, constitutional state process, and the result of that process is a set of defined consequences that includes revoking the right to gun ownership.

To call these confiscation is spurious. Typical dishonesty from undercover hack bitch.