Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19072
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash »

The other side insists on using “The Patriarchy,” a genius Oral Illusion because it implies men, who are open season, but it really means the existing power structure. Our term, “The American Dream,” has also been co-opted, denigrated, and taken from us. We have no language to use in defense because they took it all from us, including the word “liberty.” Everywhere Low-T men congregate has been lost.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19072
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash »

(Once again, all mine. You hear someone else saying this, they got it from me.)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag »

Grassley told Ms Ford

Shut your fucking twat, you don’t dictate Senate procedures to us
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek »

The SJW game has become so pervasive that the almost-MSM has decided to finally comment on the naked emperor:
Media convict Brett Kavanaugh and GOP on grounds of being white males

...To the media, that Kavanaugh is a white man and that the Republicans in control of the Judiciary Committee are all also white men is a problem to correct, thus it’s repeated over and over again on its own, without context as to why anyone should care.

Friday on MSNBC, Shareblue Media executive editor Jess McIntosh made the cliche comparison between the Kavanaugh controversy and Anita Hill’s hearing in 1991, saying, “It’s still all white men on the Republican side. There is no change between 1991 and 2018 if you look at the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary Committee. It was all white men then, it’s all white men now.”

Remarking the previous day on the “optics” of Ford choosing to publicly testify, CNN analyst Gloria Borger said Senate Republicans “understand that you have all of these white men who would be questioning this woman…”

Wednesday on ABC’s “The View,” Joy Behar declared that “these white men” in the Senate “are protecting a man who's probably guilty.”
It’s never explained why being white and male is a demerit for Kavanaugh and the Senate Republicans. You’re simply supposed to accept that it is.

Ordinary person: Yeah, they’re white but I want to look at the evide—

Media: Hush, fool! They’re white, they’re men, and that’s all you need to know!

It’s repeated by the media and Democrats (plus Republicans scared of both) that Ford needs to be “treated with respect,” which has been defined solidly as, “Do everything she says and ask no questions about her story.” . . .

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... hite-males
Yep.

The social narrative has been hijacked by the self-proclaimed "tolerant" who have re-introduced blatant racism as an "ok" standard for open conversation.If MLK did his "I Have A Dream" speach today he'd get dogpiled by a bunch of purple-haired lesbians, low-T males, and Hollywood elites lecturing him on how judging folks by "the content of their character" is irrelevant in a nation where toxic white male privilege reigns supreme.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals »

A new poll from The Huffington Post indicates that only a quarter of women believe that the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh are credible.

25 percent of women responding say that the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are credible, while 35 percent say that they haven’t heard enough to decide and 18 percent aren’t sure, according to a new poll from HuffPost/YouGov.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-governmen ... -credible/



Mass red pill event in progress.

Left unstated: 22% of women disbelieve the unsubstantiated allegations.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Fourth alleged witness (a female) named by Ford denies there was ever such a party:

https://truepundit.com/fourth-person-ch ... any-party/


It's fucking magificent to see this tactic blow up in their faces, finally.

This is like when a terrorist blows himself up, alone, while trying to manufacture his bomb, except it's happening to the entire democratic party. It's just wonderful.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I think their mistake is this: these tactics worked before because the democrats and their neocon stooges controlled the media almost entirely. But they no longer control public discourse due to the rise of social media. Tactics like this are bound to explode in their faces because people are able to research the facts for themselves and spread the truth far and wide.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals »

An attorney representing Leland Ingham Keyser, a longtime friend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California psychology professor who recently made public an accusation of decades-old sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, said Friday evening that her client denies possessing any knowledge of the alleged incident.

In a statement obtained by Breitbart News, Keyser’s attorney, Howard Walsh, wrote, “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.” According to the news outlet, Walsh confirmed that his client and Ford are “lifelong friend.”


https://www.breitbart.com/big-governmen ... kavanaugh/






All four "witnesses" now deny ever being at this alleged party.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Ex-California »

Martin Hash wrote: Fri Sep 21, 2018 2:57 pm The other side insists on using “The Patriarchy,” a genius Oral Illusion because it implies men, who are open season, but it really means the existing power structure. Our term, “The American Dream,” has also been co-opted, denigrated, and taken from us. We have no language to use in defense because they took it all from us, including the word “liberty.” Everywhere Low-T men congregate has been lost.
Image
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:40 am Fourth alleged witness (a female) named by Ford denies there was ever such a party:

https://truepundit.com/fourth-person-ch ... any-party/


It's fucking magificent to see this tactic blow up in their faces, finally.

This is like when a terrorist blows himself up, alone, while trying to manufacture his bomb, except it's happening to the entire democratic party. It's just wonderful.
Once again we see that these radical Lefties don't believe proof is necessary when they declare a person a heretic to be drawn and quartered. Same thing with the Trump investigation, they FBI knew they didn't have evidence to move forward, but did anyway.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience