THE ERA OF TRUMP

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:02 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Fife » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:12 am

Matt and his content seems good.

His editing is bad.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by StCapps » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:41 pm

*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:43 pm

StCapps wrote:

Who is Ben Swann?

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by StCapps » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:44 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:

Who is Ben Swann?
I know right? I almost forgot that guy existed, he's still around apparently.
*yip*

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:56 pm

Someone's trying to figure out what DNC staffer could have crossed paths with the UK ambassador to Uzbekibekistanstan.

Image
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
ssu
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by ssu » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:17 pm

StCapps wrote:
Here are the problems:

1) No exact evidence
2) same thing
3) Ben Swann doesn't trust the CIA (shocking!)
4) Because some questions remain unanswered, there were minor disagreements (WP wrote). Yeah, about the conclusions, like what was the ultimate objective, like uh, the FBI had with the CIA. Not the fucking hacking itself, Ben.
5) Let's trust Assange. He surely would say that Russia used him in their active measures! Great thinking mr. Swann

Very stupid talking head talking manure. Ben Swan seems a journalist that seeks to cozy up (asslick I would call it) the future President.

And, uh, if you want really evidence, a full closure about it, then have the goddam congressional hearing about it!

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:19 pm

then have the goddam congressional hearing about it!
They should. It's all he said she said shit. I want to see the evidence.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:21 pm

If they have a hearing, and they still don't produce any evidence, I hope the CIA has their charter revoked.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:22 pm

ssu wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Here are the problems:

1) No exact evidence
2) same thing
3) Ben Swann doesn't trust the CIA (shocking!)
4) Because some questions remain unanswered, there were minor disagreements (WP wrote). Yeah, about the conclusions, like what was the ultimate objective, like uh, the FBI had with the CIA. Not the fucking hacking itself, Ben.
5) Let's trust Assange. He surely would say that Russia used him in their active measures! Great thinking mr. Swann

Very stupid talking head talking manure. Ben Swan seems a journalist that seeks to cozy up (asslick I would call it) the future President.

And, uh, if you want really evidence, a full closure about it, then have the goddam congressional hearing about it!

That's not what he said. Please be honest for the sake of the forum.