Montegriffo wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:00 pm
So the evidence to show he was discriminating is going to be discounted because he settled out of court?
Oh no, you got me.
Stop trying to change the rules of the game. You aren't fooling anyone here.
You discounted evidence against Omar because she hasn't been convicted. You established that as the requirement. You got caught lying when trying to make the conviction argument against Trump. So yes, we got you lying and being a poor partisan hack bitch.
Omar hasn't even been charged.
Trump was charged, evidence was brought forward and he settled out of court and was bound to ensuring he didn't discriminate in the future.
So I was wrong about the conviction (not lying, unaware of the out of court settlement). It hardly proves that he doesn't have a racist bone in his body.
But yes, I was wrong, you got me.
You went from the standard of "only penetration matters." to "Trump had to show them a tittie, such a guilty whore."
Partisan bitch shit is partisan hack bitch shit.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
To be fair, the conservative and liberal "civic nationalism" was the precursor to the Globohomo Complex.
Once you remove from the concept of a nation any semblance of a coherent and unified ethnic group of people, you can pretty much do whatever you want with it.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 8:41 am
To be fair, the conservative and liberal "civic nationalism" was the precursor to the Globohomo Complex.
Once you remove from the concept of a nation any semblance of a coherent and unified ethnic group of people, you can pretty much do whatever you want with it.
That hasn’t existed in 40 years. America needs an existential threat to rally around. This is why the neocorns always need a war. But that won’t work anymore.
Without a complete breakdown of the corporatocracy, this ‘nation’ eats itself. As you’re seeing now.
Let me guess, Trump in front of a crowd of black clad Antifa terrorists?
I think they are white nationalists but I guess both are being inflamed by Trump's rhetoric.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Let me guess, Trump in front of a crowd of black clad Antifa terrorists?
I think they are white nationalists but I guess both are being inflamed by Trump's rhetoric.
I saw it that way too at first, but it actually works better the other way. Antifa Terrorists are exploding everytime he talks.
Well it seems to be rally with doting supporters hanging on his every word to me. The faces would be shouting in rage at the speaker if it was ANTIFA.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.