So it's all subjective, therefore useless for everyone else.Smitty-48 wrote:High calorie threads are the ones that I find interesting, low calorie threads are the ones that I do not.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Examples for high and low calorie threads?
Real Rules?
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Real Rules?
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Real Rules?
Who cares about everyone else? They're just avatars, I'm not married to them.Hwen Hoshino wrote:So it's all subjective, therefore useless for everyone else.Smitty-48 wrote:High calorie threads are the ones that I find interesting, low calorie threads are the ones that I do not.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Examples for high and low calorie threads?
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Real Rules?
So there is no we.Smitty-48 wrote:Who cares about everyone else? They're just avatars, I'm not married to them.Hwen Hoshino wrote:So it's all subjective, therefore useless for everyone else.Smitty-48 wrote:
High calorie threads are the ones that I find interesting, low calorie threads are the ones that I do not.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Real Rules?
Of course not, it's Liberty Nation, individual sovereignty, every man a king.Hwen Hoshino wrote:So there is no we.Smitty-48 wrote:Who cares about everyone else? They're just avatars, I'm not married to them.Hwen Hoshino wrote: So it's all subjective, therefore useless for everyone else.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Real Rules?
I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Smitty-48 wrote:Of course not, it's Liberty Nation, individual sovereignty, every man a king.Hwen Hoshino wrote:So there is no we.Smitty-48 wrote: Who cares about everyone else? They're just avatars, I'm not married to them.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Real Rules?
I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Smitty-48 wrote:Of course not, it's Liberty Nation, individual sovereignty, every man a king.Hwen Hoshino wrote: So there is no we.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Real Rules?
Every man cannot be king.Smitty-48 wrote:I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Smitty-48 wrote: Of course not, it's Liberty Nation, individual sovereignty, every man a king.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Real Rules?
I said every man a king, not every man the king.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Every man cannot be king.Smitty-48 wrote:I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.Hwen Hoshino wrote: I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Real Rules?
Kinda makes the title worthless.Smitty-48 wrote:I said every man a king, not every man the king.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Every man cannot be king.Smitty-48 wrote: I don't think you know what being a king meant historically.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Real Rules?
No it doesn't.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Kinda makes the title worthless.Smitty-48 wrote:I said every man a king, not every man the king.Hwen Hoshino wrote: Every man cannot be king.
Nec Aspera Terrent