Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[StCapps]

I would love to discuss the Olympics with the 2-5 other people who would like to discuss the Olympics.

Then you shouldn't have threatened censorship to make sure that happens, now your plan won't even get off the ground, and you have zero chance of having the thread you desire. You should have kept your mouth shut and not complained so much about hockey talk in your thread, we would have moved on, now the forum will be all hockey talk, including your attempted safe space thread.

If that's what gets you horny, have a blast, I guess.

That'll teach you to threaten to censor the forum. You just had to target hockey talk as the reason for your censorship, and so the genie is out the bottle.

[K@th]

You have my respect, but I don't understand why only your favoured topic is protected but no one elses is.

There are literally dozens of threads where hockey interrupts the flow of the conversation for me in topics I love.

If you guys can't handle a thread about something you hate existing, Capps is right, I won't be able to stop it literally. I can cause chaos, though, and for everyone but you two, it will be hilarious. So, a good time will be had by all.

[Smitty-48]

There will be one thread free from pages and pages and pages of NHL discussion.

So you're playing favourites for the Olympics, the IOC is getting a special thread protection, which no other topic has ever had in the history of the DCF/MHF. Curious, that.

It's just good manners really Smitty. Monopolising the conversation to endlessly talk about the NHL in every single Olympics thread is bad form. I may call you many things but illmannered is not something I would consider you to be. Capps not so much.
Just let us have one thread to talk about the games without having to wade through post after post of hockey talk.

There's just you, and Kath, you and Kath imposing an arbitrary rule on the rest of us without enforcing it consistently, is the bad form here.

[StCapps]

There have been threads on the DCF and MHF over the years where OP made an effort to keep their thread on topic.

And they were almost always derailed, if I remember correctly

Censorship won't fix the issue. We don't take kindly to censorship around these parts.

[Smitty-48]

You have my respect, but I don't understand why only your favoured topic is protected but no one elses is.

There are literally dozens of threads where hockey interrupts the flow of the conversation for me in topics I love.

If you guys can't handle a thread about something you hate existing, Capps is right, I won't be able to stop it literally. I can cause chaos, though, and for everyone but you two, it will be hilarious. So, a good time will be had by all.

Cry havok, and let slip the dogs of war, I stand with NHL hockey talk to the bitter end.

[StCapps]

So you're playing favourites for the Olympics, the IOC is getting a special thread protection, which no other topic has ever had in the history of the DCF/MHF. Curious, that.

It's just good manners really Smitty. Monopolising the conversation to endlessly talk about the NHL in every single Olympics thread is bad form. I may call you many things but illmannered is not something I would consider you to be. Capps not so much.
Just let us have one thread to talk about the games without having to wade through post after post of hockey talk.

There's just you, and Kath, you and Kath imposing an arbitrary rule on the rest of us without enforcing it consistently, is the bad form here.

Double standard is obvious. If Kath is way into the topic, that's good enough for her to slap on arbitrary rules to protect it, she has shown her true colors. Topics that she likes to talk about are more important than free speech as far as Kath is concerned.

[StCapps]

You have my respect, but I don't understand why only your favoured topic is protected but no one elses is.

There are literally dozens of threads where hockey interrupts the flow of the conversation for me in topics I love.

If you guys can't handle a thread about something you hate existing, Capps is right, I won't be able to stop it literally. I can cause chaos, though, and for everyone but you two, it will be hilarious. So, a good time will be had by all.

Cry havok, and let slip the dogs of war, I stand with NHL hockey talk to the bitter end.

You fucked with the wrong Canucks lady.

[K@th]

I have nothing against rules, so long as they are enforced consistently, one rule for the Olympics, no rules for anything else? Ain't right.

Wasn't trying to make a rule, I have no such power, this being Martin's place, but you and Capps literally derailed Olympic conversation in two threads, within two posts. You've made it quite clear you won't allow Olympic conversation to happen without you guys spamming it. /shrug

[K@th]

You fucked with the wrong Canucks lady.

You've been very clear you won't tolerate any Olympic discussion. Message received.

[StCapps]

I have nothing against rules, so long as they are enforced consistently, one rule for the Olympics, no rules for anything else? Ain't right.

Wasn't trying to make a rule, I have no such power, this being Martin's place, but you and Capps literally derailed Olympic conversation in two threads, within two posts. You've made it quite clear you won't allow Olympic conversation to happen without you guys spamming it. /shrug

Wrong. That paranoid assumption on your part and your complete over-reaction to a little hockey talk has just ensured a self fulfilling prophecy though.

Great job, Child Fucking Censorship Cunt.