Kath wrote:I won't to kill the entire beast, not just half of it.
Literally Hitler.
Kath wrote:I won't to kill the entire beast, not just half of it.
Nope, accounting must be done. If you want these people to go away they must be trashed. Tonight is the SOTU, you know who is doing the Democratic response?Kath wrote:What about Obama? What about Clinton?
Same team; different color.
Nope. Clinton was the first black president. Obama was the 2nd. Even though he was more white than black.Kath wrote:What about Obama? What about Clinton?
Same team; different color.
You guys are amazing hypocrites. When a picture of Obama and Farrkahan showed up you guys went all hysterical but there are multiple times that Drumpf has befriended the Clintons and probably still is a friend to both of them and nothing from your side. Remember him saying that they are "good people"?The Conservative wrote:Drumpf played both sides so that whoever was in power he was given the ability to call in a favor... He'd be a fool not to play that game if he wanted to succeed in the US.
Are you fucking kidding me?Penner wrote:You guys are amazing hypocrites. When a picture of Obama and Farrakhan showed up you guys went all hysterical but there are multiple times that Drumpf has befriended the Clintons and probably still is a friend to both of them and nothing from your side. Remember him saying that they are "good people"?The Conservative wrote:Drumpf played both sides so that whoever was in power he was given the ability to call in a favor... He'd be a fool not to play that game if he wanted to succeed in the US.
Or at his inauguration Luncheon where he still flattered the Clintons?
Also, some of those photos were taken AFTER Bill Clinton left office.
You are right about that but Farrakhan has disqualified himself long ago. The apt comparison would be David Duke. David Duke said some nice things about Trump, Penner and the gang lost their shit. Trump didn't immediately disavow because the bitch that was asking the question was mumbling and not letting him answer and the bitches went nuts. Why wouldn't we go nuts about Farrakhan?pineapplemike wrote:I don't know shit about Louis Farrakhan but my gut says the Clintons have done way more damage to the country
Wow you are a dumbass. He is a builder in NY, he is taking pics with the Senator from NY is that the same as taking pics with a klan leader? Do you know how far out of the mainstream Farrakhan and the modern day NOI are? No, no, no, you don't.Penner wrote:You guys are amazing hypocrites. When a picture of Obama and Farrkahan showed up you guys went all hysterical but there are multiple times that Drumpf has befriended the Clintons and probably still is a friend to both of them and nothing from your side. Remember him saying that they are "good people"?The Conservative wrote:Drumpf played both sides so that whoever was in power he was given the ability to call in a favor... He'd be a fool not to play that game if he wanted to succeed in the US.
Or at his inauguration Luncheon where he still flattered the Clintons?
Also, some of those photos were taken AFTER Bill Clinton left office.
Joe Kennedy, a fucking Kennedy that is how empty and shallow this party's bench is, they need to purified, burned through and through that is not going to happen if the cancers of their party are just allowed to attach, be ignored and we are all supposed to forget about it. This is how I know people are undercover hacks, because they ignore these things. We are supposed to put these things aside and ignore because "they didn't win." If you really cared about Democracy and corruption that is precisely when you attack. Why do Democrats want to leave the Clinton's alone? Do they own the party that much that they can't let go or cut out the cancer?clubgop wrote:Nope, accounting must be done. If you want these people to go away they must be trashed. Tonight is the SOTU, you know who is doing the Democratic response?Kath wrote:What about Obama? What about Clinton?
Same team; different color.