I know what you're talking about, and I don't roll that way. I bitch about the mess, and kick it around a bit, but I don't impose military law until bedtime.Montegriffo wrote:Not a physical fear, but if the house was a mess we were in trouble.mydogjesse wrote:+1Montegriffo wrote:Opposite for me, My father was very strict. I lived in fear of him a lot of the time and rushed around the house tidying up when I heard the distinctive sound of his car coming.
Daddy's home, everybody run!
Protecting the Free-Range Kid
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Time I was about 14 or 15 I had dinner on the table by the time Dad got home, sister and I both chose to stay with Dad after the divorce.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Funny how that works, right?Montegriffo wrote:Time I was about 14 or 15 I had dinner on the table by the time Dad got home, sister and I both chose to stay with Dad after the divorce.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Funny thing was Mum had to pay alimony to Dad.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Definitely didn't happen in America then.Montegriffo wrote:Funny thing was Mum had to pay alimony to Dad.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Probably rare here too but Mum's new husband was rich so when she appealed the courts decision that Dad had to pay her one pound per week the courts decided she had to pay towards the costs of bringing up two kids instead. Dad kept the family home and didn't have to give Mum her half till I finished school.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Definitely didn't happen in America then.Montegriffo wrote:Funny thing was Mum had to pay alimony to Dad.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
This dovetails into the school thread.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I know what you mean. The real world does NOT pull any punches. If you're not prepared to buckle down, you just get run over and beat until you figure it out.apeman wrote:In sum, I needed the hammer.
I would get it soon enough, in massive massive doses.
Life has gotten a lot easier. A hundred years ago, you wouldn't have needed to have life smack you around in your twenties. Your entire life leading up to your twenties was one ass kicking after another.
I know the sun isn't out yet, but if you want breakfast you're gonna have to go get it. Feed and water the chickens, pigs, horses, and cows, then you can eat. You wanna freeze to death this winter? Well, if not you'll be spending your cozy summer vacation felling and splitting fire wood, and it's all hand tools. Wanna go to town? Well, the rich guy in town has one of them fancy new cars, but you're gonna spend the next hour getting the horses hitched. Oh yeah, the horses. You ever picked up dog shit? Well, it's like that, but the dog is two thousand pounds and you're using a shovel.
In the winter, when the sun goes down at five, that's when you go to bed. Lamp oil and candles are too expensive to burn all night just to read. You're gonna lay down in bed, in silence, aching from the day's work, and know that it's all coming back around in the morning. You're gonna get up again and tend to all the animals, and then walk your ass all the way to school, and if you're smart you'll understand that school's your ticket.
Today, most people don't learn that until long after they should have.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
It was common to be beaten in my original neighborhood, through the generations. It was seen as 'good parenting.' People made jokes about it when they got older and told 'the worst beating I ever got' stories (which I would rip my tongue out before I ever told my kids). My generation was the one that broke the cycle.Montegriffo wrote:
Not a physical fear, but if the house was a mess we were in trouble.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Me ol' pappy never laid a glove on me, till one day I flipped him the bird right up in his grill, then he grabbed me by the lapels, to which I answered with an uppercut, then all heck broke loose... by the end of the day, I was on my way to boot camp.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Dad's Dad was born before WWI and would have had a Victorian upbringing, he joined the Army at 16 and spent his whole life as a soldier. My Dad would have had a very strict military style upbringing so really I got it light compared to him. A slap on the leg was as much of a beating I ever got and I always got an apology and an explanation afterwards.mydogjesse wrote:It was common to be beaten in my original neighborhood, through the generations. It was seen as 'good parenting.' People made jokes about it when they got older and told 'the worst beating I ever got' stories (which I would rip my tongue out before I ever told my kids). My generation was the one that broke the cycle.Montegriffo wrote:
Not a physical fear, but if the house was a mess we were in trouble.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.