MHF Democrat Primary Poll

[Montegriffo]

If I were eligible to vote I couldn't have supported either of them.
Same reason I have never voted for the Tories or Labour.
Pragmatism over idealism.
The Liberal Democrats are the most likely to get my vote next time around.

Don't you mean the other way around? At least there your vote for a minority party might accomplish something. Here it's thrown away til we get ranked voting. I've rarely cast a vote without holding my nose, that's just the way it is. But to me there was never a question of supporting any D over any R because of the entire system of govt they represent, and who they will bring to DC and appoint to the various benches, especially SCOTUS. No matter what else Hillary did, I'd have been satisfied with her SCOTUS choices because that's the D brand. The R brand is appointing foxes to watch the henhouses, putting people in charge of Departments like EPA, IRS or SEC that don't believe in the agency's mission. I vote against R as much as for a D.

My vote has never resulted in my chosen candidate being elected to Parliament.
I've only ever voted Green and they have only ever had one MP elected (in Brighton).
The area I live in (East Anglia) generally elects Conservatives in the majority of the constituencies.
My vote has therefore always been thrown away (we have a first past the post system).
What the increasing Green vote has done over the years is elect some local councillors (local government officials with no seat in Parliament) and led to the main parties adopting some environmental policies in order to retain their votes.
The Lib' Dem's, while on the rise, are very unlikely to win enough seats to form a government. They may well be in a position to join a coalition government most likely with Labour this time (David Cameron's 2010 govt was a Tory/Lib' coalition).

[clubgop]

You're incoherent again. Experience and education =/= stockholding. What an individual company requires is not relevant to the discussion, they can require anything they want as long as it's not illegal, but that's not SEC regulation, which is what we're talking about. Boardmembers DO NOT need to own stock. I've posted a relevant reference, why don't you? Can't see your screen for all the frothy spittle on it?

You're incoherent, always. You put up this narrative that isn't true and now want to move the goalpost to my mention to some of the problems to the stupid proposal and your false narrative. Check the qualifiers,

A CEO doesnt Appoint members of the board, usually it's the other way around. Shareholders hold elections and there are requirements in the by laws, experience, education are all high bars to reach for a prospective board member, than their are the financial requirements

Oh my, an unsourced quote that doesn't refute any part of what I said, I'm flat on my back!!!! /s

And StA is right on the money (so to speak) about why the compensation system is a disaster. It's head they win, tails we lose. Even in the worst case for them, not getting stock options is not the same as actually losing money. They'd still get their multimillion dollar salaries.

I am the source of the quote to respond to your board member is CEO golf buddy narrative. An argument you quickly abandoned as soon as facts came about. You sweet bitch you keep doing it. Conceding 3/4 of argument to hold onto your hack narrative. Stock options aren't the same thing as holding requirements, you dishonest hack bitch.

[clubgop]

It really is astonishing how badly Hillary sucked.

That belongs in the History forum doncha think? Why still obsess over her? She failed, move on. Its amazing people still rant about her. When Obama took office they could have investigated the fuck out of the GWB administration, but they moved on, there was 2 wars and a economic meltdown to deal with. She was never even president and you still can't let go.

You bitches cant let go of 2016. You gonna Russia Russia Russia nonstop for 3 years, we damn sure gonna talk about the Clinton's when you foisted them upon us for 4 decades. Get fucked.

[clubgop]

It really is astonishing how badly Hillary sucked.

That belongs in the History forum doncha think? Why still obsess over her? She failed, move on. Its amazing people still rant about her. When Obama took office they could have investigated the fuck out of the GWB administration, but they moved on, there was 2 wars and a economic meltdown to deal with. She was never even president and you still can't let go.

One might suggest that it's all they have. Trump's only redeeming quality being he is not Hillary.
It's not going to be a winning strategy in 2020.

He ain't Nancy Pelosi, the squad, antifa, the sjw far left. Plenty of water in that well.

[brewster]

I am the source of the quote to respond to your board member is CEO golf buddy narrative. An argument you quickly abandoned as soon as facts came about. You sweet bitch you keep doing it. Conceding 3/4 of argument to hold onto your hack narrative. Stock options aren't the same thing as holding requirements, you dishonest hack bitch.

You quoted yourself to support your argument??? Hahahahahahaha!

[Hastur]

MHRA.jpg

[StCapps]

Biden want to ban all the guns.


What a clown.

[The Conservative]

Biden want to ban all the guns.


What a clown.

I thought it was any gun that had a magazine that carried multiple bullets?

[clubgop]

I am the source of the quote to respond to your board member is CEO golf buddy narrative. An argument you quickly abandoned as soon as facts came about. You sweet bitch you keep doing it. Conceding 3/4 of argument to hold onto your hack narrative. Stock options aren't the same thing as holding requirements, you dishonest hack bitch.

You quoted yourself to support your argument??? Hahahahahahaha!

No, not to support my argument that is my argument. In your dishonesty you posted something that supports my argument not yours. Like when you want your wife to fuck you, you hand her the strap on, she doesn't have to go looking for it. You cuck the same way politically, you handed me the tool to shove up your ass.

[StCapps]

Biden want to ban all the guns.


What a clown.

I thought it was any gun that had a magazine that carried multiple bullets?

That's a damn good chunk of the guns out there. Hell even Canada doesn't go that far, we have a five round magazine limit, Biden wants a one round limit apparently. When you want to go further left than Canada on guns, that's seriously jumping the shark.