And another one bites the dust...

[DBTrek]

They are not promoting themselves, they are trying to get a head by playing victim and attacking. Some people deserve to be attacked. Matt Lauerer is a prime example. I attack him because he's F'd up and I don't want him on my team. That doesn't make all White Men bad.

Tell it to the dependent snowflake still reeling from the shots to his manhood. That guy thinks all females are “civilization destroyers” even though every civilization in history has had women. You know what civilization has never existed? One built and maintained by dependent snowflakes.
Zing!

[C-Mag]

That doesn't make all White Men bad.

There is literally only one person on this forum who thinks everyone in one gender is bad. That person is not me. Take a guess at who it is.

In our current Culture there is one
Gender that can be attacked at will .............. Males
Race that can be attacked at will..................Whites
Religion that can be attacked at will..............Catholics
Culture that can be attacked at will..............Western
Economic System.....................................Capitalism

Here's the problem I see. If this goes on long enough, it will not end well. Trump is a response to all of this. If we can't come to a place where White, Male, Catholic, American Capitalists get treated fairly in our culture there will be big trouble. And it's probably the most dangerous group to fuck with according to history.

[DBTrek]

In our current Culture there is one
Gender that can be attacked at will .............. Males
Race that can be attacked at will..................Whites
Religion that can be attacked at will..............Catholics
Culture that can be attacked at will..............Western
Economic System.....................................Capitalism

Here's the problem I see.

Well, we can complain about the complainers, but they won’t hear it. Best we can do is give them the red ass, Mike Rowe style, when they overplay their hand and quietly work to retake the public education space. Teach kids basic economics, trade skills, and self sufficiency and the bullshit artists will vanish in a sea of independent citizens who know better.

We can already see the sort of anger and hostility bred when folks feel like they have no agency in their destiny and are looking for a group to blame.

[C-Mag]

In our current Culture there is one
Gender that can be attacked at will .............. Males
Race that can be attacked at will..................Whites
Religion that can be attacked at will..............Catholics
Culture that can be attacked at will..............Western
Economic System.....................................Capitalism

Here's the problem I see.

Well, we can complain about the complainers, but they won’t hear it. Best we can do is give them the red ass, Mike Rowe style, when they overplay their hand and quietly work to retake the public education space. Teach kids basic economics, trade skills, and self sufficiency and the bullshit artists will vanish in a sea of independent citizens who know better.

We can already see the sort of anger and hostility bred when folks feel like they have no agency in their destiny and are looking for a group to blame.

+1

We also need to promote Merit, and punish those that Fuck up. Toss Lauerer and Weinstein out. Self regulate your peer group.

[The Conservative]

I think we need a nun here that isn't afraid to use a ruler.

[DBTrek]

We also need to promote Merit, and punish those that Fuck up. Toss Lauerer and Weinstein out. Self regulate your peer group.

True. We should also reframe the narrative of demographic favoritism in terms of the zero-sum game it actually represents. Instead of going down the road of “Poor urban blacks deserve...” we should ask “If we’re giving resources to only people of skin color X, who do we take those resources from?” Or “If only heritage X can have these things for free, won’t that also drive up costs for everyone who isn’t of heritage X? How do you justify that?”

SJWs enjoy mild success for appearing as if they’re only helping the downtrodden. Once it becomes clear that in order to help some people they have to actively hurt other people their narrative loses a lot of charm. They go from being Robin Hood to being Kim Jong Un.

[C-Mag]

We also need to promote Merit, and punish those that Fuck up. Toss Lauerer and Weinstein out. Self regulate your peer group.

True. We should also reframe the narrative of demographic favoritism in terms of the zero-sum game it actually represents. Instead of going down the road of “Poor urban blacks deserve...” we should ask “If we’re giving resources to only people of skin color X, who do we take those resources from?” Or “If only heritage X can have these things for free, won’t that also drive up costs for everyone who isn’t of heritage X? How do you justify that?”

SJWs enjoy mild success for appearing as if they’re only helping the downtrodden. Once it becomes clear that in order to help some people they have to actively hurt other people their narrative loses a lot of charm. They go from being Robin Hood to being Kim Jong Un.

Too Bad we don't ever get to logic and the entire country gets off at emotional responses. And that's Social Justice, and emotional response to a perspective that "My Group" Never had a chance because of That Group.

If we get another century down the road will Germans be demanding reparations for destruction of their culture by the Russkies and Americans ?

[K@th]

If we get another century down the road will Germans be demanding reparations for destruction of their culture by the Russkies and Americans ?

I was with you both until this.... now I'm like "huh?" What are you analogizing here?

[C-Mag]

If we get another century down the road will Germans be demanding reparations for destruction of their culture by the Russkies and Americans ?

I was with you both until this.... now I'm like "huh?" What are you analogizing here?

That
Wild over the top sarcasm
Don't read too much into, I can see now it was poorly executed attempt.

[clubgop]

Interest group, HuffPo, NYT, and Women's Health become reliable sources, when the topic favors your argument. Interesting.

What was your source? Your dirty dick? Just as a point of stats this is suspect. One marriage lasting 50 years is one data point vs a bunch of Hollywood marriages being a bunch of data points. First time marriages between both partners works out pretty while those that get divorced ones are more likely to get divorced again.

Yeah, breaking it up by age group is pretty ridiculous. It should be a measure of all marriages period. But hey, either way.

People get divorced a LOT in this country, so saying that it's the 'best path to security and happiness' is pretty damned silly.

Any sources for that cupcake? No, didn't think so.
OH poor baby! Women doing you as dirty as your dick?

People get divorced a LOT in this country, so saying that it's the 'best path to security and happiness' is pretty damned silly.

Tune in next week when GCF tells us that exercise and good diet isn’t the best path to staying healthy because “people get fat A LOT in this country.”

Derp.

That is a summation of all your post here. If it ain't a zerohedge article it is worthless wives tales.
"A lot of people fail so why even try."