I included the link not long after I posted it. If it had been a recent edit, there would be an edit note on the post, retard. Your "observation" is bullshit. And you likely know it, but again...want to save face. You're not good at that.The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:34 pmYou mean the one that you didn't have a link to before on? Suave... really suave... and yeah, I quoted you before you changed it top of the page, so pound sand, I'm not "retarded" I am thought observant enough that you are bullshitting in an attempt to make yourself look like less of a fool than you have already proved yourself of being.BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 1:52 pmI posted a link to Trump's tweet, retard. Look at the previous page.The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 12:42 pm
So in other words you have no proof... just word of mouth. Good to know.
In any case, I looked at your "proof" and Twitter, Facebook, and others have attempted to reduce or remove the "conservative voice" through Twitter and Facebook. It has been widely accepted as a fact for quite some time. How it's no longer a fact, is beyond me.
PragerU has been muted on Facebook (they are actually bringing a lawsuit against them for their actions) And other people have been banned, blocked, etc from Twitter. Hell, Look at Martin, he's far from Conservative, and he's been shunned...
FB and Twitter have the same right to delete anything PragerU or Martin posts on their property, as Martin has a right to delete posts made on his property. That isn't a violation of free speech. You don't have a "right" to a platform. And even then, Twitter didn't delete any of Trump's tweets. They added a silly little digital version of a post-it note. How fucking overly-sensitive does a national leader have to be to start threatening to shut down a private business because it offends his pathetic insecurities and victimhood complex?
When government wants to shut media they don't like, that IS a clear threat to freedom of speech. It's the textbook definition of violating free speech. It's fortunate that your presidents at least doesn't have the power to overturn your 1st Amendment. If they did, it's heartwarming to know that you'd just stand on the sidelines and act like you're a conservative and pretend that you thought the 1st Amendment always was a bit dodgy...
