Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26030
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by TheReal_ND » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:21 pm

Shiny coats and dead souls

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18715
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Montegriffo » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:54 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
I've wondered if they are a deviant gene that when the population gets high, we have more gays as population control.

It makes sense, will probably piss a lot of folks off.
:whistle:
I guess you would somehow have to prove a link between high population and higher rates of being gay.
Since gayness goes back as far as recorded history and likely before that it seems more likely it is just a natural state and levels in society reflect social acceptance rather than any natural selection gene.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25230
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:52 pm

Image
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28244
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by C-Mag » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:36 pm

For the first time in a couple months I checked in to see what Good Popp has been up to, and found out 4 days ago he put out a public service video on being gay................... enjoy :D
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:43 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:According to StA and Nukedog if a gay dude makes a joke about blowing a priest he must seriously approve of pedophilia, there is no way that he isn't 100% serious. Stop being right wing virtue signalers pretending that if you don't throw Milo under the bus on this that you must secretly support pedophilia too and seek to bring everyone down into moral chaos. Milo isn't pure enough for Nuke's brand of white supremacy, and that's the basis of his criticism, it's honestly like nuke is cartoon character sometimes

Keep making fools of yourselves though and keep giving people the impression that y'all reflexively hate on gay dudes because neither of you approve of their lifestyle. Fuck off you sanctimonious faggots, no one approves of pedophilia just because they don't want throw Milo under the bus as quickly as y'all do, that's just virtue signaling by right wing SJW's, who somehow don't realize they are virtue signaling and resorting to the very SJW tactics that they abhor.

See, this is where I know you that you know you lost. This is total dishonesty on your part. I couldn't care less about the joke about the priest. I was talking about the part where he defended homosexual pederasty. I quoted those parts numerous times to you, and you always ignored them and went back to this nonsense about a joke. Those quotes were not jokes. I defied you to explain the punchline to them and you ignored them. We both know you cannot because he was serious about what he said.

Here they are again:
In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents.
I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.

Feel free to explain the punchline of those so-called "jokes", but lay off the lying for a while. What he said was obviously indefensible else you wouldn't need to lie in order to defend it.
Capps is right. Your bias against gays is why you're so quick to believe this.

He didn't say pedophilia. You know he didn't, or you would have quoted it. He didn't say underage boys. You know he didn't, or you would have quoted it. He said young boys and younger boys. To a man in his thirties, an 18 year old male is for damn sure a young boy. Just like an 18 year old female would be a young girl to a man in his thirties.

He said age of consent was 16, but I'm not sure how Britain does the statutory rape thing.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:47 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:It ain't virtue signaling, clown. I don't wish ill-will on this guy at all, and taking a stand against gay sex with underaged boys hardly represents a difficult moral stand either.

This whole situation is a huge trap and a lot of people are falling into it. The right ought not fall into the trap of degeneracy. This is where it leads. Eventually you are on the internet defending statements in support of pederasty and who the fuck knows where you will end up next.
He never said underage. You did.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:50 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Fife wrote:Take stock of the people who will be aligning with you shortly.

Sure, thing.


Let's also take stock in the people who defended pederasty today..
No one's defending it. The only place it exists in this conversation is your imagination, oh and the fake news. But hey, can't win 'em all.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by clubgop » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:55 pm

He said age of consent was 16, but I'm not sure how Britain does the statutory rape thing.
That is why Monty is here.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:56 pm

Calculus Man wrote:The only leftist trap here is the one that's trying to trick Trump supporters into ostracizing one of their most charismatic, entertaining sympathizers. They're not trying to make us look like degenerates...they don't even understand the concept, for God's sake. They are trying to use your weird ideological purity to divide you from your natural allies.

I am disappointed by StA's attitude, but not surprised. This is the same guy who spent years smearing Ron Paul as a racist because he didn't like libertarians. He may have been right about SJW's and libertarianism, but he will happily use SJW tactics and draw strange, dogmatic lines in the sand that hurt his own cause. As much as I prefer Trump these days, it would have been nice to give Ron Paul a fair shot.

On one point he's right, however: it's probably not prudent to stick your neck out for Milo right now. Let him defend himself, and buy his book when he finds another publisher, if you're so inclined.
Bingo. This is an attempt at divide and conquer. And it's a pretty smart play. A gay jew who fucks black guys isn't exactly a picture perfect fit for the right, and that's the weakness that is being targeted right now. Milo likes the right, but we'll see if the right actually likes Milo.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:56 pm

He was quite clear he was talking about minors. He used his own experience as an example, as well as a joke about the pederasty in the priesthood to drive the point home. You people are deluding yourselves with this one.

In the video itself, you can see those other participants in shock, looking at each other and silently asking eaxh other wtf? Milo made no attempt to walk it back and, in fact, doubled down with a joke about pederast priests and his own experience of sex with a man.when he was a teen.