-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Fri May 05, 2017 3:26 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:Quick rundown
"Repeal" and "repeal and replace" were intentional lies.
The US will have single-payer "healthcare" before the 2024 election.
Some happy; some sad. All enslaved.
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 3:28 pm
Fife wrote:TheReal_ND wrote:Quick rundown
"Repeal" and "repeal and replace" were intentional lies.
The US will have single-payer "healthcare" before the 2024 election.
Some happy; some sad. All enslaved.
I hope you're right.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Fri May 05, 2017 3:30 pm
Oh, I'm right, Spartacus. Keep your eyes on your shovel.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri May 05, 2017 3:31 pm
Fife wrote:TheReal_ND wrote:Quick rundown
"Repeal" and "repeal and replace" were intentional lies.
The US will have single-payer "healthcare" before the 2024 election.
Some happy; some sad. All enslaved.
Mandate?
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 3:32 pm
The fact that you specifically say "single-payer" leads me to believe that you see how profit-based healthcare is problematic. (But maybe you just think they're more "Marxist"?)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Fri May 05, 2017 3:33 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:Fife wrote:TheReal_ND wrote:Quick rundown
"Repeal" and "repeal and replace" were intentional lies.
The US will have single-payer "healthcare" before the 2024 election.
Some happy; some sad. All enslaved.
Mandate?
Still there, from what I've read. Just in a different form. Possibly phased out over time. Who knows.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri May 05, 2017 3:37 pm
-
K@th
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Post
by K@th » Fri May 05, 2017 3:56 pm
Okee - you're just a giant ass - trollin on me like that. Seriously, fuck you.
You completely reject my premise on one hand and then turn to the big kids and restate my exact premise using different words.
Assclown. Now Martin has to fire me so I can put you on ignore.
Account abandoned.
-
heydaralon
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Post
by heydaralon » Fri May 05, 2017 4:00 pm
What if we just raised the tax on small businesses to 90% so that large employers like WalMart would have more money to pay their employees Healthcare scrip to be redeemed at WalMart hospital? Win win. You get rid of the small businesses which are creating unfair competition, and you allow the job creators to provide for their employees.
Shikata ga nai
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 4:07 pm
heydaralon wrote:What if we just raised the tax on small businesses to 90% so that large employers like WalMart would have more money to pay their employees Healthcare scrip to be redeemed at WalMart hospital? Win win. You get rid of the small businesses which are creating unfair competition, and you allow the job creators to provide for their employees.
If the numbers didn't belie that idea, I'd agree. Unfortunately, two-thirds of all jobs come from Small Business. (I'm sure that number would be a lot higher if employees didn't cost so damn much!)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change