Speaker to Animals wrote:Fife wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
What the fuck?
This has nothing to do with equality. It's a solution to the post-scarcity world in which most labor is automated, and most people won't have available to them a job.
If anything, there will be rampant inequality as those who can innovate and invent will amass great wealth compared to the multitudes who cannot. But the multitudes who cannot won't suffer either.
But the inequality!
OK, maybe I'm rooting back to the OP a bit much. I'm just not a fan of UBI, so I'll own my bias.
The term "income inequality" is a canard, though. A tool of the most evil among us to enslave the gullible majority.
I think income inequality is a ridiculous issue. The more advanced a society, the more income inequality will exist. People who want income equality should move to the Amazon rain forest and shack up with the Invisible People or something.
I am talking about the very real problem in our near future whereby an increasing number of people will be without jobs because we are slowly automating our entire economy. You have to address that. If you hate the idea of a UBI, then present an alternative that doesn't amount to "fuck 'em".
I don't know the alternative.... and I don't think anyone does. It's like asking the government in 1900 to come up with a plan for what we do after automobiles, airplanes, and rockets are ubiquitous, and nuclear weapons exist around the globe.
Human cooperation will find the way. Central planning will lead to pestilence, pain, and disease.
Anyway, back to IRL honest, serious, questions:
What programs would the UBI replace? ALL of them? if so, I might take another look. But if it is not 100% ALL of them, which ones get immunity?
If it is a 100% replacement, how much will it cost, and who will pay for it?
Who gets the UBI? Does a legal immigrant get it the first day off the boat? What about an illegal immigrant's anchor baby?
Just wondering.