Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:01 am

BjornP wrote:
JohnDonne wrote:This is the information economy, by owning this forum Hash is using his capital to create a monopoly on the the means of production. We don't mind him paying the bills and all, but the forum fields rightfully belong to the people that plow them with memes and posts. We're seizing it as of now, turn it over, Hash. We demand you change the name from the Martin Hash forum to the People's Free Speech Digital Plaza, or face the wrath of the glorious revolution.
Image
:P
Now that's a good joke, Breaking Bad meme for the win.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by K@th » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:02 am

StCapps wrote: if Martin doesn't fire you, he's a giant hypocrite.
In your narrow minded opinion. If someone came to a party at your house and screamed at the top of his lungs about how you get your dick hard watching kiddie porn so you could stick your stiff dick into a chid's asshole, I'm guessing you'd politely ask him to go into further detail for all to hear. 8-)
Account abandoned.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:03 am

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote: if Martin doesn't fire you, he's a giant hypocrite.
In your narrow minded opinion. If someone came to a party at your house and screamed at the top of his lungs about how you get your dick hard watching kiddie porn so you could stick your stiff dick into a chid's asshole, I'm guessing you'd politely ask him to go into further detail for all to hear. 8-)
Stop trying to compare this situation to some in person venue where most of us are strangers. Apples and Oranges, your analogy blows monkey balls.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by K@th » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:03 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:All I am saying is this: if there is going to be a rule about censoring people for baseless accusations of pedophilia, then Kath shouldn't be able to engage in it herself while she censors people she doesn't like. .
I've literally been waiting for days and days for you to find and quote my post calling you a pedophile. You keep not doing that, so you either have me on ignore, or you can't find it.

Nobody believes you anyway; you have very little credibility, wrt truth telling, around here.
Account abandoned.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by K@th » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:04 am

StCapps wrote: Stop trying to compare this situation to some in person venue where most of us are strangers. Apples and Oranges.
So you don't allow free speech in your own house, but you require it on a forum you don't pay for nor own?
Account abandoned.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:05 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:All I am saying is this: if there is going to be a rule about censoring people for baseless accusations of pedophilia, then Kath shouldn't be able to engage in it herself while she censors people she doesn't like.

It's fucking outrageous. If it were any of you who were accused by her of being a pedophile because you don't believe her man-hating view of the world, while she then censors people for jokingly referring to her friends as a pedophile, then you'd be a little upset too.

Rules should be universal. They should apply to everybody. No special exemptions. No double standards.
How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that the vast majority of Clubby's posts are still there for everyone to read and only the graphic descriptions of child penetration have been removed?
How many of your own posts have been moderated?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:06 am

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote: Stop trying to compare this situation to some in person venue where most of us are strangers. Apples and Oranges.
So you don't allow free speech in your own house, but you require it on a forum you don't pay for nor own?
Martin is the one claiming he's pro free speech and that his forum is the epitome of that, his actions indicating otherwise make him a hypocrite. He's free to be a hypocrite, he does own the place, but that doesn't get him off the hook for hypocrisy, you might let him off the hook, I don't.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:09 am

Kath wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:All I am saying is this: if there is going to be a rule about censoring people for baseless accusations of pedophilia, then Kath shouldn't be able to engage in it herself while she censors people she doesn't like. .
I've literally been waiting for days and days for you to find and quote my post calling you a pedophile. You keep not doing that, so you either have me on ignore, or you can't find it.

Nobody believes you anyway; you have very little credibility, wrt truth telling, around here.

Jesus, woman. You called me a pedo in the last forum because, after you tried to throw some sob story of a young girl being "raped" in my face, I replied with the more recent news articles that showed, in fact, she made up the rape and was charged for it.

I brought it up again when I found out you censored clubgop for calling Monty a pedo. You doubled down on that, claiming that I am a pedo because I don't "recognize that a 13 year old girl can consent". That's the fucking problem, Kath. If a 13 year old girl has sex with a 13 year old boy, you want to call it rape and throw the boy in prison because the girl cannot consent. You don't give a moment's thought about the boy. It doesn't even occur to you that the boy could just as easily been the target of the girl's predation, or that the boy shouldn't be able to consent to sex at that age either.

You cannot sit there and delete people's posts for doing what you do all the time and still be an honest moderator.

If there is going to be a rule, you should adhere to it as well.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by K@th » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:12 am

StCapps wrote: Martin is the one claiming he's pro free speech and that his forum is the epitome of that, his actions indicating otherwise make him a hypocrite. He's free to be a hypocrite, he does own the place, but that doesn't get him off the hook for hypocrisy, you might let him off the hook, I don't.
So you don't allow free speech in your own home, but expect others to leave their homes completely unfettered for you, even when it comes to adults abusing children?
Account abandoned.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Martin Does Not Believe in Free Speech and is Anti-Freedom

Post by K@th » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:14 am

I only delete posts from spam bots. I never called you a pedophile, though I did call into question your judgement about consent. You believe 12 year olds are qualified to consent to sex. That's a sickness, to be sure; not sure it goes all the way to pedophilia, unless you are the one claiming a 12 year old girl consented to sex with you and you obliged. Claiming it for someone else is odd, though, especially since you don't know the girl.

I'm not having this argument again. I never called you a pedophile, so proof or STFU.
Account abandoned.