TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
It would appear that Montegriffo is a little confused about what multiculturalism is. It has nothing to do with integration. The whole idea multiculturalism is that immigrants will enrich our culture by not integrating. They are supposed be a counterweight to the Phallogocentric western values that are causing the oppression of every definable minority group in our society.
Integration would only serve to reinforce and normalise the existing power structures so the left doesn't want any of that.
Integration would only serve to reinforce and normalise the existing power structures so the left doesn't want any of that.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Kebab in London attacking police as all white ppl are blamed for the Finsbury Park attack.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/818779 ... lahu-Akbar
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/818779 ... lahu-Akbar
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Hastur wrote:It would appear that Montegriffo is a little confused about what multiculturalism is. It has nothing to do with integration. The whole idea multiculturalism is that immigrants will enrich our culture by not integrating. They are supposed be a counterweight to the Phallogocentric western values that are causing the oppression of every definable minority group in our society.
Integration would only serve to reinforce and normalise the existing power structures so the left doesn't want any of that.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
I mean, how dumb do you have to be to blame a whole race or colour or religion for the actions of a few crazed nut jobs?TheReal_ND wrote:Kebab in London attacking police as all white ppl are blamed for the Finsbury Park attack.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/818779 ... lahu-Akbar
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
I'd argue that Muslims cannot integrate into any other civilization. They never have and I doubt they ever will as long as they are Muslim. It's baked into the religion.
It's probably also true that Christians cannot really truly integrate into totally foreign cultures either. If a majority of Chinese became Christian, and if China were a democracy, one would expect for them to begin stamping out anti-life policies and other cultural norms of that civilization.
Another example would be Mexico. The Mexican people were not impressed with the Spanish, and were likely to continue worshiping their Aztec and Mayan gods in secret, but for whatever reasons, the Lady of Gaudalupe apparition convinced most of them to convert despite the example of the Spanish conquerers. That conversion utterly changed the nature of Mexican civilization into what it is today. They are still basically the Aztec and Mayan people, but their culture is very different.
Islam and Christianity are not religions that can arrive into a foreign culture in massive numbers (either through immigration or conversion) without utterly changing the nature of that civilization. This is why the Japanese emperors and shoguns said fuck no to Christianity.
If the majority of democratic western nations ever become Muslim, then we will lose everything that makes us westerners. We will lose civil liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and more. Those things are not compatible with Islam in any way.
It's probably also true that Christians cannot really truly integrate into totally foreign cultures either. If a majority of Chinese became Christian, and if China were a democracy, one would expect for them to begin stamping out anti-life policies and other cultural norms of that civilization.
Another example would be Mexico. The Mexican people were not impressed with the Spanish, and were likely to continue worshiping their Aztec and Mayan gods in secret, but for whatever reasons, the Lady of Gaudalupe apparition convinced most of them to convert despite the example of the Spanish conquerers. That conversion utterly changed the nature of Mexican civilization into what it is today. They are still basically the Aztec and Mayan people, but their culture is very different.
Islam and Christianity are not religions that can arrive into a foreign culture in massive numbers (either through immigration or conversion) without utterly changing the nature of that civilization. This is why the Japanese emperors and shoguns said fuck no to Christianity.
If the majority of democratic western nations ever become Muslim, then we will lose everything that makes us westerners. We will lose civil liberties, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and more. Those things are not compatible with Islam in any way.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Still waiting for a definition of integration.California wrote:Hastur wrote:It would appear that Montegriffo is a little confused about what multiculturalism is. It has nothing to do with integration. The whole idea multiculturalism is that immigrants will enrich our culture by not integrating. They are supposed be a counterweight to the Phallogocentric western values that are causing the oppression of every definable minority group in our society.
Integration would only serve to reinforce and normalise the existing power structures so the left doesn't want any of that.
How many Italian Americans are refusing to integrate? What about German Americans with their Frankfurters and Hamburgers. I mean they're not even trying.
What I really hate is those foreigners who don't even bother to learn our language, calling pavements sidewalks, deliberately mispronouncing basil and aluminium and refusing to spell colour with a ''u''. Send them back to where they came from.......
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
even while people are getting beheaded on the streets by muslims they'll still deflect and blame white people
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Yup.TheReal_ND wrote:even while people are getting beheaded on the streets by muslims they'll still deflect and blame white people
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Montegriffo wrote:Still waiting for a definition of integration.California wrote:Hastur wrote:It would appear that Montegriffo is a little confused about what multiculturalism is. It has nothing to do with integration. The whole idea multiculturalism is that immigrants will enrich our culture by not integrating. They are supposed be a counterweight to the Phallogocentric western values that are causing the oppression of every definable minority group in our society.
Integration would only serve to reinforce and normalise the existing power structures so the left doesn't want any of that.
How many Italian Americans are refusing to integrate? What about German Americans with their Frankfurters and Hamburgers. I mean they're not even trying.
What I really hate is those foreigners who don't even bother to learn our language, calling pavements sidewalks, deliberately mispronouncing basil and aluminium and refusing to spell colour with a ''u''. Send them back to where they came from.......
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_integration
Social integration is a dynamic and structured process in which all members participate in dialogue to achieve and maintain peaceful social relations. Social integration does not mean forced assimilation.
Social integration is focused on the need to move toward a safe, stable and just society by mending conditions of social disintegration and social exclusion—social fragmentation, exclusion and polarization; and by expanding and strengthening conditions of social integration—towards peaceful social relations of coexistence, collaboration and cohesion.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: TRUCKING #58 VANEROO BOOGALOO
Sounds to me that the right doesn't want integration either then. Polarization, exclusion and social fragmentation are all tools of the right. ''send them back'' is almost a definition of exclusion. ''they are different and are not compatible'' is classic polarization. Fragmentation - ''don't want them in my neighbourhood''.Hastur wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_integrationSocial integration is a dynamic and structured process in which all members participate in dialogue to achieve and maintain peaceful social relations. Social integration does not mean forced assimilation.
Social integration is focused on the need to move toward a safe, stable and just society by mending conditions of social disintegration and social exclusion—social fragmentation, exclusion and polarization; and by expanding and strengthening conditions of social integration—towards peaceful social relations of coexistence, collaboration and cohesion.
Which is more likely to lead to a safe, stable and just society? Acceptance of differences between cultures or an attitude of ''they don't belong here''.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.