You should have known he was lying politician, that much was obvious. If you voted for Trump because you thought he wasn't a lying politician, then you shouldn't have voted for him, talk about naive.Martin Hash wrote:Again, agree with Capps.StCapps wrote:This is a negative shared by all politicians, Trump isn't special in this regard. Yawn.Kath wrote:I didn't dislike him for his policies, per se, I dislike him because he talks out of his ass. You can't take him literally or seriously. I thought that negative was understood.
We voted for Trump, not because he was a good person, it's because we hoped he wasn't a lying politician... But he was.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Thanks for the hindsight, Nostradamus. Dude, I'm an optimist, I would not have voted for a Republican, or even a serving politician just to NOT vote for Hillary. It had to be a combo: possible non-liar vs. Hillary.StCapps wrote:You should have known he was lying politician. If being one would have lead to not voting for him than you shouldn't have voted for him.Martin Hash wrote:Again, agree with Capps.StCapps wrote:This is a negative shared by all politicians, Trump isn't special in this regard. Yawn.
We voted for Trump, not because he was a good person, it's because we hoped he wasn't a lying politician... But he was.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
StCapps wrote:You should have known he was lying politician. If being a lying politician would have lead to you not voting for Trump, then you shouldn't have voted for him. Talk about naive.Martin Hash wrote:Again, agree with Capps.StCapps wrote:This is a negative shared by all politicians, Trump isn't special in this regard. Yawn.
We voted for Trump, not because he was a good person, it's because we hoped he wasn't a lying politician... But he was.
The lying politician wasn't that big of issue to me. My priorities on voting for Trump were.
1. Prevent Hillary from being POTUS
2. Prevent Hillary from being POTUS
3. Outsider
4. Burn it down! Remember that, it's a statement against the establishment
5. Fuck the hack press
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The reason to vote for Trump was that it's more likely that he wasn't lying about certain topics than Hillary Clinton, not that he was some saint who never lied and you can actually trust him to really put America First and Drain The Swamp. Sounds like you fucked up and misread Trump badly, all politicians running for POTUS have to lie or they can't win an election because they will be facing an opponent who will lie.Martin Hash wrote:Thanks for the hindsight, Nostradamus. Dude, I'm an optimist, I would not have voted for a Republican, or even a serving politician just to NOT vote for Hillary. It had to be a combo: possible non-liar vs. Hillary.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Oh really? I'm not allowed to dislike the man based on my opinion of what kind of man he is, based on 30+ years of watching him on reality tv?StCapps wrote: . If there isn't much on either side of your pro-con ledger you shouldn't have strong views one way or the other.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You're a cynical man.StCapps wrote:The reason to vote for Trump was that it's more likely that he wasn't lying about certain topics than Hillary Clinton, not that he was some saint who never lied and you can actually trust him to really put America First and Drain The Swamp. Sounds like you fucked up and misread Trump badly, all politicians running for POTUS have to lie or they can't win an election because they will be facing an opponent who will lie.Martin Hash wrote:Thanks for the hindsight, Nostradamus. Dude, I'm an optimist, I would not have voted for a Republican, or even a serving politician just to NOT vote for Hillary. It had to be a combo: possible non-liar vs. Hillary.
p.s. FYI, you can trust I won't overtly lie about anything. (White lies are okay: How do I look in this dress? Awesome, wanna fuck you this instant.)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Really miss being able to research old posts. You had your head so far up Trump's ass during the primaries, and now, because I can't go back and look, you can pretend you were mostly anti-Trump all along. Obvious lie is obvious.StCapps wrote: You should have known he was lying politician, that much was obvious. If you voted for Trump because you thought he wasn't a lying politician, then you shouldn't have voted for him, talk about naive.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
That's how I remember your stance, though you were very bullish on the wall nonsense.Martin Hash wrote:
Thanks for the hindsight, Nostradamus. Dude, I'm an optimist, I would not have voted for a Republican, or even a serving politician just to NOT vote for Hillary. It had to be a combo: possible non-liar vs. Hillary.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Whether or not you personally like someone or not should not effect your view of their job performance. Just because you don't like Trump doesn't mean you are basing that dislike on his fuck ups in office, this is my point, you are basing your dislike of Trump on not liking him as a person not the job he's doing as POTUS. The rest of us base our opinions of Trump's job performance on his actual performance and not on personality traits of his that rub us the wrong way, you need to get your priorities straight.Kath wrote:Oh really? I'm not allowed to dislike the man based on my opinion of what kind of man he is, based on 30+ years of watching him on reality tv?StCapps wrote: . If there isn't much on either side of your pro-con ledger you shouldn't have strong views one way or the other.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18732
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I still am a Waller, big time. That too may enter into the Lie Arena.Kath wrote:That's how I remember your stance, though you were very bullish on the wall nonsense.Martin Hash wrote:
Thanks for the hindsight, Nostradamus. Dude, I'm an optimist, I would not have voted for a Republican, or even a serving politician just to NOT vote for Hillary. It had to be a combo: possible non-liar vs. Hillary.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change