Social Justice Warriors Thread

[Speaker to Animals]

The other angle of this problem is that we are really talking about the scourge of NPCs. NPCs are the product of MSM fake news and propaganda. But that propaganda is pushed through all sorts of content, not just the news. Netflix, for instance, is nonstop fucking SocJus propaganda. I had to cancel that HIV subscription to retain my sanity. I don't even watch television now. It's all cancer.

But when many people complain about all this bullshit, they are really complaining about the legion of zombie NPCs out there, which is the chief product of western corporate media.

These people really only consume "news" from the television, newspapers, magazines, etc. The fact that some alt media YouTuber has ratings much higher than Rachel Maddow doesn't solve the problem of the NPC because the NPC only goes to corporate sources, and isn't likely to watch much YouTube.

[C-Mag]

[pineapplemike]

Major MSM products are almost always bullshit. You get more facts from independent players. The problem there is that those players broadcast via social media tools like YouTube, Facebook, etc. The companies that control those social networks do everything possible to rig or outright censor the best competition of the MSM.

For instance, in basic searches on latest news stories on YouTube, you often have to click through two or three screens worth of MSM content. This content has very low view counts and often shit ratings, but YouTube deliberately puts that out front of the sources that have very high ratings and view counts.

Example: Tim Pool is a liberal alternative media guy that people link to here fairly often. He has what is a modest 353k subscribers. He posted a video on the Smollet hoax and how the MSM fucks shit up two days ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2eBSiv3UB4 As of this post's composition, this video has 136k views. This guy is a small player and he beats most of the propaganda personalities in the MSM (though not the big names like Hannity or Maddow).

There are alt media guys on YouTube that regularly beat ratings of the very best ratings the MSM can possibly get.

But if they get too big for their britches, YouTube will proceed to demonitize them. If that doesn't work, YouTube will start handing out nebulous community guideline strikes. If that doesn't work, they will eventually shadow ban or outright ban the YouTuber and delete the content.

These social media companies are not even making decisions on a profit basis any longer. It's straight political dogma, even if that means losing money.

People can and do regularly beat the liberal MSM. The problem is that the corporataucracy proceeds to go so far as to ban some of them essentially from the Internet itself. As odious as Alex Jone's behavior was regarding the Sandy Hook parents, that wasn't the reason he was basically kicked off the Internet. He was kicked off the Internet because he gets bigger views than MSM. He's their competitor.

[Fife]

DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

Jussie Smollett and the Information Warfare of the Left

DARVO is not a new political strategy; charlatans have been using these maneuvers for millennia. Ancient Greeks knew them by the name Sophists, with the modern definition of sophistry being "using information to deceive." From Plato's noble lie to Machiavelli telling the prince he should be a "great pretender and dissembler," it is used because it historically works. But that does not make this form of informational warfare morally right.

. . .

The authors of a DARVO study tried to use Justice Kavanaugh and the Republicans as an example of the GOP engaging against accuser Blasey Ford, but in order for the technique to have been employed, Ford would have had to really be a victim first. But Kavanaugh was the victim as the Left actively tried to destroy his life with false attacks on his character, villainizing him, all while denying the blatant proof that Ford's accusations were completely unsubstantiated.

It's not just individual victims and perpetrators, either. Mainstream media have hired some highly trained manipulators to use DARVO tactics on all GOP platform issues. Gun control by villainizing the people who just want to protect themselves, emotionally equating the right to bear arms with a desire to kill schoolchildren. Now, similarly, citizens who support the border wall are finding that they're being condemned as morally corrupt for their political view. "Only racists want a wall." According to the Left, if you don't like the idea of infanticide being legal in New York State, then you're really just a misogynist who wants to oppress women.

This technique is used by social engineers who want you to react a certain way. By forcing people to question their own realities by introducing emotional arguments that don't connect to rational ones, they can harness individual self-doubt while disorienting and destabilizing opponents. When this is repeated constantly, the media can destroy some individuals' ability to make sound judgments to the point that they become submissive, just like actual abuse victims. This has the goal of making readers who are easier to emotionally charge for the next, probably uncorroborated, story that rolls across their newsfeed.

[TheReal_ND]

Happy black history month

[C-Mag]

Chicago announced there will now be background checks and a 3 day waiting period for rope.

[GloryofGreece]

DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

Jussie Smollett and the Information Warfare of the Left

DARVO is not a new political strategy; charlatans have been using these maneuvers for millennia. Ancient Greeks knew them by the name Sophists, with the modern definition of sophistry being "using information to deceive." From Plato's noble lie to Machiavelli telling the prince he should be a "great pretender and dissembler," it is used because it historically works. But that does not make this form of informational warfare morally right.

. . .

The authors of a DARVO study tried to use Justice Kavanaugh and the Republicans as an example of the GOP engaging against accuser Blasey Ford, but in order for the technique to have been employed, Ford would have had to really be a victim first. But Kavanaugh was the victim as the Left actively tried to destroy his life with false attacks on his character, villainizing him, all while denying the blatant proof that Ford's accusations were completely unsubstantiated.

It's not just individual victims and perpetrators, either. Mainstream media have hired some highly trained manipulators to use DARVO tactics on all GOP platform issues. Gun control by villainizing the people who just want to protect themselves, emotionally equating the right to bear arms with a desire to kill schoolchildren. Now, similarly, citizens who support the border wall are finding that they're being condemned as morally corrupt for their political view. "Only racists want a wall." According to the Left, if you don't like the idea of infanticide being legal in New York State, then you're really just a misogynist who wants to oppress women.

This technique is used by social engineers who want you to react a certain way. By forcing people to question their own realities by introducing emotional arguments that don't connect to rational ones, they can harness individual self-doubt while disorienting and destabilizing opponents. When this is repeated constantly, the media can destroy some individuals' ability to make sound judgments to the point that they become submissive, just like actual abuse victims. This has the goal of making readers who are easier to emotionally charge for the next, probably uncorroborated, story that rolls across their newsfeed.

We are living in a world where Kafka novels and Alinsky rules are the guiding framework we live inside.

The Right should use their tactics against them. Particularly the rule of "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

[C-Mag]

We are living in a world where Kafka novels and Alinsky rules are the guiding framework we live inside.

The Right should use their tactics against them. Particularly the rule of "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

Independent media has been trying, but the corporate media runs so much cover for the Lefties its difficult. For example the criminal leadership of Virginia. Governor in Blackface, Lt Gov MeToo, AG Blackface. But nothing is happening, and the press has dropped it.

I think unless you have a situation like Chicago where the police immediately saw Smollet was lying and they had the fortitude to carry through it's pretty tough.

[Fife]

The cops don't appreciate when they are left out of the planning phase of psyops.

Don't expect this kind of FUBAR op next time around.

[C-Mag]

This was deleted, but hey, archives
Nancy Pelosi‏
Verified account
@SpeakerPelosi
The racist, homophobic attack on @JussieSmollett is an affront to our humanity. No one should be attacked for who they are or whom they love. I pray that Jussie has a speedy recovery & that justice is served. May we all commit to ending this hate once & for all.
6:40 PM - 29 Jan 2019