BREAKING NEWS

[Montegriffo]

drove away from them

Well at least we have established who is prepared to make excuses for murder when it is someone from their "side" doing the murdering.

[Okeefenokee]

Just a bunch of peaceful dindus.

[The Conservative]

And on more news:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... now-so-far

Parlament was attacked by a peaceful Jihadist.

[Montegriffo]

And on more news:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... now-so-far

Parlament was attacked by a peaceful Jihadist.

You know that link is from March 2017 don't you?
And there's an I in parliament.

[Speaker to Animals]

If you are attacked by a few dozen terrorists wielding clubs, pipes, and semi-autonomous rifles pointed at you, do you flee for your life?

Yes

Which is exactly what he did. He is a paranoid schizophrenic who was attacked by a mob of designated terrorists wielding semi-automatic rifles, pipes, and clubs. He freaked out and tried to escape his attackers only to plow into pedestrians.

The leader of the people who attacked him is on film coordinating the attack before it happened.

And yet you still don't seem to mind the fact that the actual terrorists who caused this are walking free.


Something is seriously wrong with you. You have abandoned a sense of justice. You don't care about the truth. You decided you don't like the guy who was attacked, and you are perfectly happen to see him hang while those responsible walk free and are even lionized by the lying media.

[Montegriffo]

You are equating attacking a car with ploughing into people.
I condemn both acts. Prosecute the car attackers for criminal damage and the car driver for murder.
Simple really, don't make excuses for people who kill.

[Speaker to Animals]

You are equating attacking a car with ploughing into people.
I condemn both acts. Prosecute the car attackers for criminal damage and the car driver for murder.
Simple really, don't make excuses for people who kill.

No, I am not.

I am saying the car plowed into people not because the driver was trying to hurt the pedestrians, but because he was trying to escape from armed terrorists trying to kill him.

Duh. Who is at fault here? The guy who hit pedestrians while trying to escape a terror attack or the terrorists??

Holy fuck, man. Do you even attempt to be honest? Are you at least honest with yourself and accept that you have to lie and distort the truth for some political gain or do you lie even to yourself?


Also, you can't condemn a fucking accident. It's not a moral choice. He did not intend to hit those people. He was trying to escape from the attackers.

The Antifa terrorists that attacked him made a moral choice, and they are the ones who are actually legally responsible for everything that happened. That's why this case has been sat on for so long. The prosecutors are freaking out about how to deal with this. They know they have to go after at the very least the professor who organized this terror attack, but that means it's likely going to come out that the police and city officials colluded with terrorists.

The narrative the media is spinning is ass backwards here, no matter how little you happen to care for the white nationalists who rallied there that day.

You might hate everything those white nationalists stand for, but they were the ones in the right that day. You might hate everything this kid stood for, but he wasn't responsible for the terror attack perpetrated by Antifa. His accident of hitting pedestrians was the result of him fleeing for his life from a fucking terror attack organized in part through police collusion.

[Montegriffo]

Ok Chubby. I'm tired of your twisting now. No point in repeating over and over that you are defending a murderer. I have no desire to be responsible for one in eight of all posts...

[SuburbanFarmer]

Once again, it falls to me to apply the simplest of critical thinking, to another hyperbole-ridden virtue orgy.

Were the protesters attacking every car on the street that day? Were there ANY other cars attacked?

Is it possible that (as is often the case), our “victim” was talking shit or provoking a crowd of angry idiots?

[Speaker to Animals]

Once again, it falls to me to apply the simplest of critical thinking, to another hyperbole-ridden virtue orgy.

Were the protesters attacking every car on the street that day? Were there ANY other cars attacked?

Is it possible that (as is often the case), our “victim” was talking shit or provoking a crowd of angry idiots?

That's not critical thinking, dumbass. It doesn't matter if his was the only car attacked. They are on video attacking his car with deadly weapons. That's what he was racing away from.

There is even a video of this professor who led this Antifa group ordering them to ambush a vehicle and attack that person right before they did exactly that, to deadly consequences.

Like the English fascist over the pond, the only thing you give a shit about is lynching your political opponents. Truth and actual justice mean jack shit to you.