tue4t wrote: hello.
Obligatory fake news remix
On that guy's channel I found this:
That one should have gone viral. Wow.
tue4t wrote: hello.
Obligatory fake news remix
Golf clap, you actually got me good with that one.The Conservative wrote:You forgot a few letters...
24129490_2011455749072330_7051392709314914635_n.jpg
And they wonder why we don't trust them.tue4t wrote:Very very serious shit. Trump derangement syndrome is cute and all until you wipe billions off the market through your naive stupidity. If i was making the decisions at ABC I would have fired him and put as much distance as i could between his stench and the company. That it's only a suspension tells you that ABC is still half hearted about their wrong doing - they are trying to hedge themselves between the coming legal pain and blowback from their liberal subscribers by putting this into limbo land for a time.C-Mag wrote:ABC News Suspends Brian Ross After Fake Bombshell Story caused Stock Market to plummet 300 pointsABC News has suspended anchor Brian Ross after having to correct what initially seemed to be a bombshell story on President Trump and former national security adviser Michael Flynn that sent markets tumbling.
Ross, citing a single anonymous source, falsely reported that Flynn was prepared to testify that Trump ordered him to make contacts with the Russians during the campaign.
The veteran newsman has a long history of erroneous reports.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/02/abc-n ... ell-story/
*edit*
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
tue4t wrote:
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
You've been saying this for years. You've been wrong a million times. The market will eventually go down. That doesn't make you right because you kept saying it was right around the corner, and it eventually happened.GrumpyCatFace wrote:tue4t wrote:
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
Ummm no. It's a solid indication of how fragile the markets are. The fundamentals have been completely ignored for a couple of years now, thanks to the Fed pricing bonds and savings out of existence. That was the first tremor, in a very, very big event.
INB4 Okee calls me a panic monkey again. I'll be the one laughing in a few months.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
I underestimated how long the Fed could keep those balls in the air, along with every other macro-economist on the planet. They've blown a bubble far larger than anyone could have anticipated, and it's still going somehow. Totally admit that.Okeefenokee wrote:You've been saying this for years. You've been wrong a million times. The market will eventually go down. That doesn't make you right because you kept saying it was right around the corner, and it eventually happened.GrumpyCatFace wrote:tue4t wrote:
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
Ummm no. It's a solid indication of how fragile the markets are. The fundamentals have been completely ignored for a couple of years now, thanks to the Fed pricing bonds and savings out of existence. That was the first tremor, in a very, very big event.
INB4 Okee calls me a panic monkey again. I'll be the one laughing in a few months.
Oh, i agree. The fed have dug quite a hole.GrumpyCatFace wrote:tue4t wrote:
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
Ummm no. It's a solid indication of how fragile the markets are. The fundamentals have been completely ignored for a couple of years now, thanks to the Fed pricing bonds and savings out of existence. That was the first tremor, in a very, very big event.
INB4 Okee calls me a panic monkey again. I'll be the one laughing in a few months.
I'll agree that he's fantastic for the stock market. Bubbles need pitchmen, and he's the perfect guy for the job.tue4t wrote:Oh, i agree. The fed have dug quite a hole.GrumpyCatFace wrote:tue4t wrote:
Markets usually respond to information shocks with a downward bias, but this is a pretty big one. Pretty solid indication that Trump is good for business, or atleast better for business than any current political alternative.
Ummm no. It's a solid indication of how fragile the markets are. The fundamentals have been completely ignored for a couple of years now, thanks to the Fed pricing bonds and savings out of existence. That was the first tremor, in a very, very big event.
INB4 Okee calls me a panic monkey again. I'll be the one laughing in a few months.
What i meant to say was that Trump is better for consumer confidence than any other alternative, not that he's magically save the US dollar from it's deep structural problems.
The linked Twitchy piece gives the dope in simple twitter format.CNN reported exclusively that Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about Hillary Clinton and Wikileaks on the same day he supposedly was sent info by Wikileaks, which CNN said was September 4th. CNN had “bombshell” on the brain.