Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Isn't it amusing when the left suddenly comes out against degeneracy?
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Speaker to Animals wrote:Isn't it amusing when the left suddenly comes out against degeneracy?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Pussies.JamesK wrote:His book deal was cancelled. Dangerous, indeed.
http://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/milo-yi ... ent=safari
*yip*
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Holy fuck, if I see one more thread about Milo on /pol/ I'm going to call someone a faggot.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
They should just burn his book, or would that be a little too on-the-nose?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Its not even out yet. This is disappointing.pineapplemike wrote:They should just burn his book, or would that be a little too on-the-nose?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
He breaks down how the media operates when they try to destroy somebody. He's right about how these stories have beats.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Personally, I think people defending what he said is kind of weird. Are you really cool with that?
All this week, you better believe an army of reporters are going to sift through this guy's life in detail. His statement itself sort of hints that there is more to this.
This whole story is a huge trap. You won't get to excuse what Milo said and then argue that the weird shit that Podesta and Hillary Clinton were talking about are a legitimate story that is being suppressed.
All this week, you better believe an army of reporters are going to sift through this guy's life in detail. His statement itself sort of hints that there is more to this.
This whole story is a huge trap. You won't get to excuse what Milo said and then argue that the weird shit that Podesta and Hillary Clinton were talking about are a legitimate story that is being suppressed.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
I've heard him make the comments before the media took some similar remarks recently and spun them, and it seems like a joke and just an odd sense of humor. He might honestly believe a little of what he's saying but assuming he's okay with pedophilia and the Catholic churches involvement in that, because of this is obvious media bullshit.Speaker to Animals wrote:Personally, I think people defending what he said is kind of weird. Are you really cool with that?
All this week, you better believe an army of reporters are going to sift through this guy's life in detail. His statement itself sort of hints that there is more to this.
Is it an easy to spin joke made in poor taste to provoke outrage? Sure, but is that really the end of the world? I suppose it possible he's just fucked in the head and is trying to rationalize his own abuse or something, but that shouldn't be the assumption you run with unless you trying to generate public attention with a more outrageous story.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
StCapps wrote:I've heard him make the comments before the media took some similar remarks recently and spun them, and it seems like a joke and just an odd sense of humor. He might honestly believe a little of what he's saying but assuming he's okay with pedophilia because of this is obvious media bullshit.Speaker to Animals wrote:Personally, I think people defending what he said is kind of weird. Are you really cool with that?
All this week, you better believe an army of reporters are going to sift through this guy's life in detail. His statement itself sort of hints that there is more to this.
Is it an easy to spin joke made in poor taste to provoke outrage? Sure, but is that really the end of the world?
It wasn't a joke at all. He was being humorous when he said it, but it wasn't a joke. And I am not talking about an edited anything. You can read the entire transcript for yourself.
Milo: “This is a controversial point of view I accept. We get hung up on this kind of child abuse stuff to the point where we’re heavily policing even relationships between consenting adults, you know grad students and professors at universities.”
The men in the joint video interview then discuss Milo’s experience at age 14.
Another man says: “The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have sex with an adult, probably…” The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”
Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”
It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me, another man says, interrupting Milo.
Milo: “And you know what, I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”
Other people talk. Oh my God, I can’t handle it, one man says. The next thing in line is going to be pedophilia…says another man.
Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”
Another man said, “You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can be honest about that?”
Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.”
If you want to defend that, then go right ahead I guess. Don't blame me when it blows up in your face.