Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

[clubgop]

It's great to see that everybody has their stock, Fox approved distractions at the ready so they can avoid addressing the fact that Republicans refused to allow a first-hand witness to testify in the Senate despite complaining that the evidence was all hearsay up till now.

Still is hearsay. Bolton wasn't on that
that phonecall either. Also no one has firsthand knowledge of the President's motive. So it's moot. His testimony proves or disproves nothing. Either there was corruption or at the least the apperance of corruption to investigate burisma and the VP or there was not. If you think the dishonorably discharged cokehead, sister in law fucking, son of the vice president who just so happened to be the pointman on Ukraine served on the board of the corrupt gas monopoly of the ukraine with no experience in energy or Ukraine is all fine and dandy than you are the one with the guardian, BBC, approved talking points all lined up, so you can avoid addressing those points.

[Hastur]

Who is the body supposed to be?

I dunno, a fair trial maybe? Justice?
The precedent is set now, future Presidents can commit murder and then refuse to allow witnesses to testify if they hold the Senate.
Oh, and they can blackmail countries into digging up dirt on their opponents by withholding financial aid.
Bye-bye America.

That answer says everything. You don't even know what he's supposed to have done. The Ukrainians say they weren't victimized. They got all the aid they wanted and they never conducted any investigation on Biden. You have no victim. Except DNC pride.

Don't be a tool.

[The Conservative]

Please stay out of US politics, you are more than ignorant...

Aww, did that one sting a bit?
Put a bit of ice on it and man up.

No, because you are ignoring facts, and well... You just need to either learn, or let the adults in the room do the talking.

The democrats in the house had time to call Bolton. They refused to because they didn't want to drag this out in court, which Bolton threatened to do if they attempted to supina him.

They wanted Trump impeached; they didn't want it done right; they just wanted it done.

It is not the place of the Senate to do the job of the House. The Senate dictates what the punishment is by the facts that the House pulls up.

The Senate does not need to pull up new witnesses because the House refused to do it's job.

If you haven't figured it out, the House is the trial; the Senate is the punishment phase.

How many more ways do I really need to say it?

[Hastur]

This is the hero that the Democrats wanted to rely on to stop the evil orange man.

Bo ho . Nobody wants to listen to that POS promoting his book.

[Montegriffo]

Who is the body supposed to be?

I dunno, a fair trial maybe? Justice?
The precedent is set now, future Presidents can commit murder and then refuse to allow witnesses to testify if they hold the Senate.
Oh, and they can blackmail countries into digging up dirt on their opponents by withholding financial aid.
Bye-bye America.

That answer says everything. You don't even know what he's supposed to have done. The Ukrainians say they weren't victimized. They got all the aid they wanted and they never conducted any investigation on Biden. You have no victim. Except DNC pride.

Don't be a tool.

Ah yes, that's the ''he was interrupted during the robbery so he didn't get any money and is therefore innocent'' defence.

[The Conservative]

I dunno, a fair trial maybe? Justice?
The precedent is set now, future Presidents can commit murder and then refuse to allow witnesses to testify if they hold the Senate.
Oh, and they can blackmail countries into digging up dirt on their opponents by withholding financial aid.
Bye-bye America.

That answer says everything. You don't even know what he's supposed to have done. The Ukrainians say they weren't victimized. They got all the aid they wanted and they never conducted any investigation on Biden. You have no victim. Except DNC pride.

Don't be a tool.

Ah yes, that's the ''he was interrupted during the robbery so he didn't get any money and is therefore innocent'' defence.

What the hell are you talking about?

[Martin Hash]

The House will certainly call Bolton as a witness. They have no reason to stop this charade; Monte isn’t alone in his hatred.

[clubgop]

I dunno, a fair trial maybe? Justice?
The precedent is set now, future Presidents can commit murder and then refuse to allow witnesses to testify if they hold the Senate.
Oh, and they can blackmail countries into digging up dirt on their opponents by withholding financial aid.
Bye-bye America.

That answer says everything. You don't even know what he's supposed to have done. The Ukrainians say they weren't victimized. They got all the aid they wanted and they never conducted any investigation on Biden. You have no victim. Except DNC pride.

Don't be a tool.

Ah yes, that's the ''he was interrupted during the robbery so he didn't get any money and is therefore innocent'' defence.

More like "he didn't have a withdrawal slip but they let him take out money anyway but he was supposed to have a withdrawal slip and nevermind the previous occupant didnt have a withdrawal slip we are going to complain bitch and moan cause this guy doesn't have a withdrawal slip." defence.

[clubgop]

The House will certainly call Bolton as a witness. They have no reason to stop this charade; Monte isn’t alone in his hatred.

Uh what? The House is done they voted out the articles it is dead. They still have to go to court. The White House will say executive privilege, he most likely would lose have to testify and then he may show up refusing any questions based on priviledge in which case it is back to court.

[pineapplemike]

democrats willing to align themselves with john fucking bolton in order to go after trump tells me all i need to know

Republicans complaining about the lack of first-hand witnesses refusing to hear the testament of a first-hand witness tells the world all they need to know.

is this the first hand witness the democrats are hinging their case on?