Seattle Socialists Strangle Golden Goose

[Kath]

We already know that they HAVE wasted money. We LITERALLY can not know what WILL happen without consulting the Tarot.

How fiscally responsible of you.

If you spend $50 on a gadget and you find the gadget not useful in your life, in fact, it makes your life worse, do you go out and buy 10 more of the same gadget?

[Speaker to Animals]

We already know that they HAVE wasted money. We LITERALLY can not know what WILL happen without consulting the Tarot.

How fiscally responsible of you.

If you spend $50 on a gadget and you find the gadget not useful in your life, in fact, it makes your life worse, do you go out and buy 10 more of the same gadget?

Yes. Secret Santa is coming up.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

We already know that they HAVE wasted money. We LITERALLY can not know what WILL happen without consulting the Tarot.

How fiscally responsible of you.

If you spend $50 on a gadget and you find the gadget not useful in your life, in fact, it makes your life worse, do you go out and buy 10 more of the same gadget?

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

[Speaker to Animals]

Hint: many of is misuse the word literally because it is fun, and it annoys our target audience. It's literally hilarious.

[Kath]

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

I'm saying that if I give my kid $100 for a baseball uniform, and he goes out and buys cocaine, he's going to have a hard time convincing me that if I just fork over another $100, this time he'll really and truly buy the baseball uniform.

Sounds to me as if you'd just keep throwing $100 more at the problem with the hopes that this time he comes through.

[DBTrek]

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

I'm saying that if I give my kid $100 for a baseball uniform, and he goes out and buys cocaine, he's going to have a hard time convincing me that if I just fork over another $100, this time he'll really and truly buy the baseball uniform.

Sounds to me as if you'd just keep throwing $100 more at the problem with the hopes that this time he comes through.

“You’ll literally never know without consulting the Tarot”
I believe that’s the robust defense of continually making bad decisions that the progressives have retreated to at this point.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

I'm saying that if I give my kid $100 for a baseball uniform, and he goes out and buys cocaine, he's going to have a hard time convincing me that if I just fork over another $100, this time he'll really and truly buy the baseball uniform.

Sounds to me as if you'd just keep throwing $100 more at the problem with the hopes that this time he comes through.

I understand what you are saying. I don't think your analogies are convincing.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

I'm saying that if I give my kid $100 for a baseball uniform, and he goes out and buys cocaine, he's going to have a hard time convincing me that if I just fork over another $100, this time he'll really and truly buy the baseball uniform.

Sounds to me as if you'd just keep throwing $100 more at the problem with the hopes that this time he comes through.

“You’ll literally never know without consulting the Tarot”
I believe that’s the robust defense of continually making bad decisions that the progressives have retreated to at this point.

I keep forgetting that facetious doesn't fly with this very literal minded crowd.

[TheReal_ND]

Does that strike you as either a convincing analogy or a defense of your liberal use of the term 'literally?'

I'm saying that if I give my kid $100 for a baseball uniform, and he goes out and buys cocaine, he's going to have a hard time convincing me that if I just fork over another $100, this time he'll really and truly buy the baseball uniform.

Sounds to me as if you'd just keep throwing $100 more at the problem with the hopes that this time he comes through.

In a White Society the baseball uniform cost would be borne by the baseball team family and cocaine use shunned on a societal level as opposed to what you have now which is more like the baseball uniform jew charges you 100 for a ten dollar uniform so he can blow it on blow and molest some kids while getting them hooked on his blow addiction.

In a truly functional society you would never be handing your teenage son 100 dollars to purchase from the 'market" something for him to participate in the community with. Instead, he would likely be issued a uniform if he chooses to participate and your duty as a parent to the wider community would pay for it, instead of him paying for it with relegated duty.

The economics arguments are DISTRACTIONS

Our communities DO NOT EXIST ANYMORE

[Kath]

I understand what you are saying. I don't think your analogies are convincing.

Okay. Maybe look at it this way.

Seattle: We need to raise taxes to help the homeless. Result of the spend? More homeless
Seattle: We somehow have more homeless than before, so we're going to raise taxes again to help the homeless. Result of the spend? More homeless.
Seattle: We somehow have more homeless than before, so we're going to raise taxes again to help the homeless. Result of the spend? More homeless.
Seattle: We somehow have more homeless than before, so we're going to raise taxes again to help the homeless. Result of the spend? More homeless.

Seattle now: We somehow have more homeless than before, so we're going to raise taxes again to help the homeless. What will the results be? Impossible to know, really, since we've never tried this before.