BjornP wrote:JohnDonne wrote:
@bjorn: If she has no right to talk about cow bells to the Swiss because of cultural relativity then she has no right to talk to Muslims about clit cutting for the same reason.
I don't support anyone's "right" to speak
to anyone. You have a right to speech, period. No one has a "right" to an audience. I don't have a right that says you must read my posts, or vice versa. You can speak to anyone, and they may listen to you... but it's not a right. If you argue like an asshole, chances are people won't listen to you, for example.
Your point about cultural relativism falls flat in this thread. There is nothing wrong with, and nothing un-culturally relativist, about criticizing other cultures. You can respect people's right to be different, while at the same disagreeing alot with those differences.
When I said she has the right to speak to the Swiss about their cowbells I was talking about a
moral right, (a distinction in English from actual constitutionally or lawfully recognized rights) in response to the claims that she was somehow an asshole, or morally
in the wrong for complaining about Swiss culture while living there. I am saying she was
morally correct and not an asshole to criticize another culture for their cruel practices , no matter where she is from or where she lives, because wrong is wrong and right is right. I was not saying the Swiss are legally obligated to be her audience.
About cultural relativism, I am denying the idea that to criticize cruelty is to "impose ones morality" on another in an unfair manner. I never said or implied that it was "un-culturally relativistic" to criticize other cultures, I am saying criticism of other cultures is compatible with both universal morality as well as relativistic morality.
I can respect the right of a culture to be different only so far as the culture respects the individual's rights. For I don't recognize the "right" to take away rights, that is not a "right" of any sort, if you are confused about the matter I am sorry for you.