Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:41 am

Zlaxer wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:

There is nothing to be "balanced" - the Sandihook families should have no cause of action against the gun manufacturers.

And no - I don't find it odd that the NRA doesn't waste money and resources on mental health issues....it takes enough resources just to keep the gun grabbers at bay.....
Perhaps.. perhaps not. If it can be shown that they marketed specifically to young, violent kids, then there may be some liability - same as cigarette companies faced in the 80s.

I don't think it's a particularly important cross to hang on, but the inevitable mind-blowing by the Right should be entertaining.

You have no fucking clue about Sandihook do you? Do you even know why Adam was involved with weapons to begin with? Alleging that gun manufacturers specifically target violent minors is an asinine argument trumped up by a bunch a gun grabbing statists and money hungry lawyers...

You really think that there's enough crazy minors out there making up a large enough market share to justify spending $,$$$ on advertising? You're out of your mind.
Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.

You have no fucking clue about Sandihook do you? Do you even know why Adam was involved with weapons to begin with?
Do you? Enlighten us.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

apeman
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by apeman » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:46 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.
can you point to anything, at all, that supports your claim?

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:48 am

apeman wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.
can you point to anything, at all, that supports your claim?

Whoa, ape. Don't you know anything about Fake News? :goteam: :drunk:

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:50 am

apeman wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.
can you point to anything, at all, that supports your claim?
Common sense.. experience.. knowledge of how corporate marketing and sales think... This is not difficult for a man of your intellect.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:51 am

Image

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:53 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.
So GFC's conspiracy theories = just cause of action....yet somehow it's gone from mentally ill teens predisposed to violence to just teens.....so marketing guns to teens (who the last time I checked had a right to use them under adult supervision) is now illegal.....

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:You have no fucking clue about Sandihook do you? Do you even know why Adam was involved with weapons to begin with?
Do you? Enlighten us.
His mother turned Adam on to guns over his father's objections - the parents ended up divorcing over disagreement as to how to handle Adam - the mother hid her head in the sand concerning how dangerous her son really was. She allowed Adam to know where the weapons were stored and trained him on how to use them. The responsibility lies solely with her and her lack of judgment.

Dude - we're not going to agree on this - you want a nanny state - I want freedom - just secede already....I don't think anyone will stop you guys...

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:57 am

Zlaxer wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, from a corporate mindset, yes. The American market is completely saturated, so the only room for growth is youth. Pushing out the 'newest and greatest' weaponry only goes so far - they've about hit the limit on innovation and gadgetry.
So GFC's conspiracy theories = just cause of action....yet somehow it's gone from mentally ill teens predisposed to violence to just teens.....so marketing guns to teens (who thew last time I checked had a right to use them under adult supervision) is now illegal.....
Just hypothesizing on how this could have happened. Every marketing department turns to youth marketing, when the market is saturated. You're in quite a fervor right now, so I'm sure you feel that you made a worthy point here though.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:You have no fucking clue about Sandihook do you? Do you even know why Adam was involved with weapons to begin with?
Do you? Enlighten us.
His mother turned Adam on to guns over his father's objections - the parents ended up divorcing over disagreement as to how to handle Adam - the mother hid her head in the sand concerning how dangerous her son really was. She allowed Adam to know where the weapons were stored and trained him on how to use them. The responsibility lies solely with her and her lack of judgment.
So, you're telling me that a young man who was trained in the use of firearms by his idiot mother, and knew how to handle them correctly from a young age, could have used them in an act of mass violence? *gasp* Who could have forseen this??

It's almost as if... well...

What if we restricted the age at which one could handle a firearm? Or would that be the equivalent of 'burning the Constitution'?

Hey, while I'm talking Crazy here, what if those parents were allowed to sue the idiot mother of that monster, for unleashing him upon society, and not getting him treatment, and training him in the use of fucking killing weapons for no good goddamn reason? :shock:

Nah, we can't have all that... it's just some dead kids, after all. GOD SAVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT!!!
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:00 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Blah blah blah - I don't think people should have weapons dam personal liberties
Your cute argumentative footwork isn't fooling or persuading anyone. You've got nothing to go on - which why you have to dance so hard.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:02 am

Zlaxer wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
So GFC's conspiracy theories = just cause of action....yet somehow it's gone from mentally ill teens predisposed to violence to just teens.....so marketing guns to teens (who thew last time I checked had a right to use them under adult supervision) is now illegal.....
Just hypothesizing on how this could have happened. Every marketing department turns to youth marketing, when the market is saturated. You're in quite a fervor right now, so I'm sure you feel that you made a worthy point here though.


Do you? Enlighten us.
His mother turned Adam on to guns over his father's objections - the parents ended up divorcing over disagreement as to how to handle Adam - the mother hid her head in the sand concerning how dangerous her son really was. She allowed Adam to know where the weapons were stored and trained him on how to use them. The responsibility lies solely with her and her lack of judgment.
So, you're telling me that a young man who was trained in the use of firearms by his idiot mother, and knew how to handle them correctly from a young age, could have used them in an act of mass violence? *gasp* Who could have forseen this??

It's almost as if... well...

What if we restricted the age at which one could handle a firearm? Or would that be the equivalent of 'burning the Constitution'?
Your cute argumentative footwork isn't fooling or persuading anyone. You've got nothing to go on - which why you have to dance so hard.
Yes... them fancy words ain't gonna fly here, boah.

Well, this was another complete waste of time here. Good work.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:03 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote: Well, this was another complete waste of time here. Good work.
People saw the real you - my work here is done.