The private prison decision was made in compliance with Trump's goal of lowering government spending. Pay a private company a contracted rate, and you shift the responsibility for the workers in the prison from the Federal Government to the private company. You get out of paying for benefits, which cuts your expenditure by 3/4. Benefits are expensive. Fiscally, it makes sense.Okeefenokee wrote:You don't have any fucking news.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Gee. Frantic shit posting to cover up the news. How surprising.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
So does importing cheap labor from Mexico.Xenophon wrote:The private prison decision was made in compliance with Trump's goal of lowering government spending. Pay a private company a contracted rate, and you shift the responsibility for the workers in the prison from the Federal Government to the private company. You get out of paying for benefits, which cuts your expenditure by 3/4. Benefits are expensive. Fiscally, it makes sense.Okeefenokee wrote:You don't have any fucking news.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Gee. Frantic shit posting to cover up the news. How surprising.
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:22 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
No, illegal immigration *costs* the government money, dude.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So does importing cheap labor from Mexico.Xenophon wrote:The private prison decision was made in compliance with Trump's goal of lowering government spending. Pay a private company a contracted rate, and you shift the responsibility for the workers in the prison from the Federal Government to the private company. You get out of paying for benefits, which cuts your expenditure by 3/4. Benefits are expensive. Fiscally, it makes sense.Okeefenokee wrote:
You don't have any fucking news.
Try again.
Don't neglect this Subtle Q...https://open.spotify.com/track/3A7dANGO ... 8uH471TDCw
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You're talking about emergency room visits and food stamps?Calculus Man wrote:No, illegal immigration *costs* the government money, dude.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So does importing cheap labor from Mexico.Xenophon wrote: The private prison decision was made in compliance with Trump's goal of lowering government spending. Pay a private company a contracted rate, and you shift the responsibility for the workers in the prison from the Federal Government to the private company. You get out of paying for benefits, which cuts your expenditure by 3/4. Benefits are expensive. Fiscally, it makes sense.
Try again.
Offset in a major way by the Big Ag taxes, and exporting food all over the world. Not even a contest.
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:22 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If you can't even include education costs in your cute little strawman, I am not going to take you seriously.GrumpyCatFace wrote:You're talking about emergency room visits and food stamps?Calculus Man wrote:No, illegal immigration *costs* the government money, dude.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
So does importing cheap labor from Mexico.
Try again.
Offset in a major way by the Big Ag taxes, and exporting food all over the world. Not even a contest.
Your stupid argument is based on the premise that illegal immigration is the only reason we can export food or collect taxes on farms. Which is flagrantly absurd. Also notice how you have to point to nebulous, indirect benefits in order to justify real, crippling costs to our local and state governments. Costs that would be immediately eliminated if we simply enforced the law.
Don't neglect this Subtle Q...https://open.spotify.com/track/3A7dANGO ... 8uH471TDCw
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Yes... those disgusting brown people have ruined everything. I'll just sit back and watch you chase that carrot around the yard for a while. You're obviously controlled as easily as the rest of the horde.Calculus Man wrote:If you can't even include education costs in your cute little strawman, I am not going to take you seriously.GrumpyCatFace wrote:You're talking about emergency room visits and food stamps?Calculus Man wrote:
No, illegal immigration *costs* the government money, dude.
Try again.
Offset in a major way by the Big Ag taxes, and exporting food all over the world. Not even a contest.
Your stupid argument is based on the premise that illegal immigration is the only reason we can export food or collect taxes on farms. Which is flagrantly absurd. Also notice how you have to point to nebulous, indirect benefits in order to justify real, crippling costs to our local and state governments. Costs that would be immediately eliminated if we simply enforced the law.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Action - Get called out on false statementGrumpyCatFace wrote:Yes... those disgusting brown people have ruined everything. I'll just sit back and watch you chase that carrot around the yard for a while. You're obviously controlled as easily as the rest of the horde.Calculus Man wrote:If you can't even include education costs in your cute little strawman, I am not going to take you seriously.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
You're talking about emergency room visits and food stamps?
Offset in a major way by the Big Ag taxes, and exporting food all over the world. Not even a contest.
Your stupid argument is based on the premise that illegal immigration is the only reason we can export food or collect taxes on farms. Which is flagrantly absurd. Also notice how you have to point to nebulous, indirect benefits in order to justify real, crippling costs to our local and state governments. Costs that would be immediately eliminated if we simply enforced the law.
Reaction - Build a feeble strawman (check)
Action - Strawman called out for what it is
Reaction - Attack using anti-conservative stereotype. Be sure not to directly address any facts made by your opponent. (check)
Is there an official guidebook for this stuff? There has to be. This has become way too predictable.
Last edited by PartyOf5 on Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Please explain how on earth I could have strawmanned you by restating your position in plain English?PartyOf5 wrote:Action - Get called out on false statementGrumpyCatFace wrote:Yes... those disgusting brown people have ruined everything. I'll just sit back and watch you chase that carrot around the yard for a while. You're obviously controlled as easily as the rest of the horde.Calculus Man wrote:
If you can't even include education costs in your cute little strawman, I am not going to take you seriously.
Your stupid argument is based on the premise that illegal immigration is the only reason we can export food or collect taxes on farms. Which is flagrantly absurd. Also notice how you have to point to nebulous, indirect benefits in order to justify real, crippling costs to our local and state governments. Costs that would be immediately eliminated if we simply enforced the law.
Reaction - Build a feeble strawman (check)
Action - Strawman called out for what it is
Reaction - Attack using anti-conservative stereotype. Be sure not to directly address any facts made by your opponent. (check)
Is there an official guidebook for this stuff? There has to be. This has become way too predictable.
-
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:22 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Pretty much.PartyOf5 wrote:Action - Get called out on false statementGrumpyCatFace wrote:Yes... those disgusting brown people have ruined everything. I'll just sit back and watch you chase that carrot around the yard for a while. You're obviously controlled as easily as the rest of the horde.Calculus Man wrote:
If you can't even include education costs in your cute little strawman, I am not going to take you seriously.
Your stupid argument is based on the premise that illegal immigration is the only reason we can export food or collect taxes on farms. Which is flagrantly absurd. Also notice how you have to point to nebulous, indirect benefits in order to justify real, crippling costs to our local and state governments. Costs that would be immediately eliminated if we simply enforced the law.
Reaction - Build a feeble strawman (check)
Action - Strawman called out for what it is
Reaction - Attack using anti-conservative stereotype. Be sure not to directly address any facts made by your opponent. (check)
Is there an official guidebook for this stuff? There has to be. This has become way too predictable.
Don't neglect this Subtle Q...https://open.spotify.com/track/3A7dANGO ... 8uH471TDCw