THE ERA OF TRUMP

[Okeefenokee]

They still can't figure out why they are losing either. That's the hilarious part about all of this.

Not a fucking clue among them.

[Penner]

SEE YOU IN COURT FAGGOT! WHAT A MESS!

It's a mess, all right. Did someone from Justice review it before Trump signed it?

[3knuckleshuffle]

Trump supporters often have infinitely better criticisms of Trump than his detractors. There are plenty of bugs, but the Trump haters go around wasting all their time claiming that a feature is actually a bug instead. Sad.

+1/+1/+1

You guys are all right. The Misinformation and Trumphobic reactions probably strengthen Trump in the long run and water down reasoned criticisms

Get over yourselves guys, I've yet to see a valid response to the question "why does Trump's travel ban not include Egypt or Saudi Arabia when these countries supplied the men who planned and executed the attacks on 9/11?" The only response so far has been some vague statement that other countries may be included in the future. It's fairly obvious that self interest concerning investments in those countries has exempted them rather than any valid security reasons.
If we are Trump haters then you are blinkered to the realities of popularism in substitution for real leadership.

I keep hearing this repeated, that Trump has business interests in those countries, which is why they were exempted. Seems rediculous. Egypt is essential because of its agreements with Israel on the Gaza Strip, and to a lesser extent, the Suez Canal. Saudi Arabia is exempt for the same reason it is always exempt, that sweet, sweet crude. The 9/11 argument is a good one, but ultimately, geopolitics wins the day. If Iraq was crucial to Israel's defense, or had much larger oil reserves, they would be exempt too.

[SuburbanFarmer]

This piece of shit.

Well he certainly seems sure of what he's saying..

5 hair salons, and 50 employees.. I should be concerned that she can't grow further without providing some health benefits? That poor, poor woman.. I'll bet she's eating Ramen just to stay afloat...

Tell us, what do you know about the cosmetology industry? You jumped in, so you must know something.

Well, as I understand it, a hair salon is a business operated for profit - stop me if I'm going too fast - and that business requires a pretty massive outlay of capital to get going. Along the course of operation, an owner may feel that they have enough capital to create a second one, generating more profit. It appears that this particular owner did that 5 times, generating a great deal of profit. One assumes of course, that she is in fact doing this for profit, not simply out of a sense of duty to the uncut hair around those 5 areas.

If I were to contemplate my situation as that owner, I might come to the conclusion that more salons would create more profit. At that point, I have 5 profit-generating businesses. Quite likely, I've got a very nice house, spare capital, and I have enough spare time to contemplate opening more of them. (I know, amazing)

So, should I stand in front of millions of people in a presidential debate forum, and ask a contender to plead my case for easing the woeful burden of subsidizing some health care for my profit-generating plebs, if I choose to expand further? Or should I scrape together whatever humanity remains in my wretched soul, and choose to help them in return for my larger business and profits? Or, and this is a real stretch, perhaps I could choose to just shut the fuck up and enjoy the free money that my 48 employees are making for the rest of my life?

Returning to my (and your) real life, looking at this fuckstick Mrs. Burns on tv, exactly how bad should I feel for her?

[Okeefenokee]

Well he certainly seems sure of what he's saying..

5 hair salons, and 50 employees.. I should be concerned that she can't grow further without providing some health benefits? That poor, poor woman.. I'll bet she's eating Ramen just to stay afloat...

Tell us, what do you know about the cosmetology industry? You jumped in, so you must know something.

Well, as I understand it, a hair salon is a business operated for profit - stop me if I'm going too fast - and that business requires a pretty massive outlay of capital to get going. Along the course of operation, an owner may feel that they have enough capital to create a second one, generating more profit. It appears that this particular owner did that 5 times, generating a great deal of profit. One assumes of course, that she is in fact doing this for profit, not simply out of a sense of duty to the uncut hair around those 5 areas.

If I were to contemplate my situation as that owner, I might come to the conclusion that more salons would create more profit. At that point, I have 5 profit-generating businesses. Quite likely, I've got a very nice house, spare capital, and I have enough spare time to contemplate opening more of them. (I know, amazing)

So, should I stand in front of millions of people in a presidential debate forum, and ask a contender to plead my case for easing the woeful burden of subsidizing some health care for my profit-generating plebs, if I choose to expand further? Or should I scrape together whatever humanity remains in my wretched soul, and choose to help them in return for my larger business and profits? Or, and this is a real stretch, perhaps I could choose to just shut the fuck up and enjoy the free money that my 48 employees are making for the rest of my life?

You should have just said no, and saved the bytes.

Also, not a pres debate. Look again.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Tell us, what do you know about the cosmetology industry? You jumped in, so you must know something.

Well, as I understand it, a hair salon is a business operated for profit - stop me if I'm going too fast - and that business requires a pretty massive outlay of capital to get going. Along the course of operation, an owner may feel that they have enough capital to create a second one, generating more profit. It appears that this particular owner did that 5 times, generating a great deal of profit. One assumes of course, that she is in fact doing this for profit, not simply out of a sense of duty to the uncut hair around those 5 areas.

If I were to contemplate my situation as that owner, I might come to the conclusion that more salons would create more profit. At that point, I have 5 profit-generating businesses. Quite likely, I've got a very nice house, spare capital, and I have enough spare time to contemplate opening more of them. (I know, amazing)

So, should I stand in front of millions of people in a presidential debate forum, and ask a contender to plead my case for easing the woeful burden of subsidizing some health care for my profit-generating plebs, if I choose to expand further? Or should I scrape together whatever humanity remains in my wretched soul, and choose to help them in return for my larger business and profits? Or, and this is a real stretch, perhaps I could choose to just shut the fuck up and enjoy the free money that my 48 employees are making for the rest of my life?

You should have just said no, and saved the bytes.

Also, not a pres debate. Look again.

"aaaand I am not a wealthy person"

She's part of the fucking cancer. Gas her.

[Okeefenokee]

Well, as I understand it, a hair salon is a business operated for profit - stop me if I'm going too fast - and that business requires a pretty massive outlay of capital to get going. Along the course of operation, an owner may feel that they have enough capital to create a second one, generating more profit. It appears that this particular owner did that 5 times, generating a great deal of profit. One assumes of course, that she is in fact doing this for profit, not simply out of a sense of duty to the uncut hair around those 5 areas.

If I were to contemplate my situation as that owner, I might come to the conclusion that more salons would create more profit. At that point, I have 5 profit-generating businesses. Quite likely, I've got a very nice house, spare capital, and I have enough spare time to contemplate opening more of them. (I know, amazing)

So, should I stand in front of millions of people in a presidential debate forum, and ask a contender to plead my case for easing the woeful burden of subsidizing some health care for my profit-generating plebs, if I choose to expand further? Or should I scrape together whatever humanity remains in my wretched soul, and choose to help them in return for my larger business and profits? Or, and this is a real stretch, perhaps I could choose to just shut the fuck up and enjoy the free money that my 48 employees are making for the rest of my life?

You should have just said no, and saved the bytes.

Also, not a pres debate. Look again.

"aaaand I am not a wealthy person"

She's part of the fucking cancer. Gas her.

You first.

[de officiis]

SEE YOU IN COURT FAGGOT! WHAT A MESS!

It's a mess, all right. Did someone from Justice review it before Trump signed it?

It will be interesting to see whether the Administration decides to amend the order to circumvent some of these problems.

[Penner]

It's a mess, all right. Did someone from Justice review it before Trump signed it?

It will be interesting to see whether the Administration decides to amend the order to circumvent some of these problems.

Yeah, that would be interesting to see how Trump's administration would circumvent some of the problems but I feel like this is going to continue all the way to the Supreme Court (although, I wonder how fast will it take for it to reach that level. From what I have heard they take a while just to select the cases they want to hear....)

[Penner]

In the mean time:

(CNN)Threats against more than one judge involved in legal challenges to President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration have prompted federal and local law enforcement agencies to temporarily increase security protection for some of them, according to law enforcement officials.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/ ... index.html