Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.SilverEagle wrote:Cheaters gonna cheat. The refs gave that game to the Pats. There is no way you can rationally argue against that even though I know you will try homer. The Pat got away with 5 holds that I can recall.
NFL 2017
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 25249
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: NFL 2017
Like I said, it was pretty blatant on that last running play.The Conservative wrote:Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.SilverEagle wrote:Cheaters gonna cheat. The refs gave that game to the Pats. There is no way you can rationally argue against that even though I know you will try homer. The Pat got away with 5 holds that I can recall.
And the pass-interference at the half was BS as well.
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
Show me.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Like I said, it was pretty blatant on that last running play.The Conservative wrote:Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.SilverEagle wrote:Cheaters gonna cheat. The refs gave that game to the Pats. There is no way you can rationally argue against that even though I know you will try homer. The Pat got away with 5 holds that I can recall.
And the pass-interference at the half was BS as well.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
Yep big time!GrumpyCatFace wrote:Like I said, it was pretty blatant on that last running play.The Conservative wrote:Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.SilverEagle wrote:Cheaters gonna cheat. The refs gave that game to the Pats. There is no way you can rationally argue against that even though I know you will try homer. The Pat got away with 5 holds that I can recall.
And the pass-interference at the half was BS as well.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
I'm waiting...SilverEagle wrote:Yep big time!GrumpyCatFace wrote:Like I said, it was pretty blatant on that last running play.The Conservative wrote:
Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.
And the pass-interference at the half was BS as well.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
I'm not the only one who can see through this B.S., sports writers are talking about it as well. You're so far up the Pat's collective asses, as 99.9% of Pats fans are, that you'll never see the truth. See apparently GCF, myself, and every other non Pats fan watch a different game than you.The Conservative wrote:Show them. I saw the entire game, and there were holding that wasn't called on the Jaguars too, so amuse me... for someone that has no skin in the game, you are getting so but hurt it's almost sad.SilverEagle wrote:Cheaters gonna cheat. The refs gave that game to the Pats. There is no way you can rationally argue against that even though I know you will try homer. The Pat got away with 5 holds that I can recall.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ever ... p-victory/
Last edited by SilverEagle on Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 25249
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: NFL 2017
For what? You want me to spend my time looking for NFL footage of a non-highlight-reel play? Do your own research, clown. You know the 2 plays that I'm talking about.The Conservative wrote:I'm waiting...SilverEagle wrote:Yep big time!GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Like I said, it was pretty blatant on that last running play.
And the pass-interference at the half was BS as well.
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
Actually, no I don't because I saw the same things and I don't agree. So, yes... you want to accuse, you find the video, because well, as you keep telling people here, without proof... fuck you.GrumpyCatFace wrote:For what? You want me to spend my time looking for NFL footage of a non-highlight-reel play? Do your own research, clown. You know the 2 plays that I'm talking about.The Conservative wrote:I'm waiting...SilverEagle wrote:
Yep big time!
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
You're delusional. That's the problem. You'll never see or admit it.The Conservative wrote:Actually, no I don't because I saw the same things and I don't agree. So, yes... you want to accuse, you find the video, because well, as you keep telling people here, without proof... fuck you.GrumpyCatFace wrote:For what? You want me to spend my time looking for NFL footage of a non-highlight-reel play? Do your own research, clown. You know the 2 plays that I'm talking about.The Conservative wrote:
I'm waiting...
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
Says the person who is attempting to say that his team doesn't cheat when it's been caught in more corruption and cheating actions than any other team by double... except one, and that's the NY Jets.SilverEagle wrote:You're delusional. That's the problem. You'll never see or admit it.The Conservative wrote:Actually, no I don't because I saw the same things and I don't agree. So, yes... you want to accuse, you find the video, because well, as you keep telling people here, without proof... fuck you.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
For what? You want me to spend my time looking for NFL footage of a non-highlight-reel play? Do your own research, clown. You know the 2 plays that I'm talking about.
How am I supposed to take you seriously?
It's like saying "Don't murder" when you just finished burying your last victim... it's more than just hypocritical.
#NotOneRedCent