Kid Rock '18

Post by **Okeefenokee** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:09 pm

C-Mag wrote:Never liked the turd, him becoming a politician isn't going to help that.

This still pisses me off

Doubt you'll find anyone here who's crazy about him. Guess who's even less crazy about him?

Post by **Fife** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:22 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:Doubt you'll find anyone here who's crazy about him.

Ask the gentle proprietor, et al.

Post by **Okeefenokee** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:50 pm

And here I thought Hash had class. Shoulda know'd something was up when we heard about him moochin' beers off his neighbors.

Post by **Speaker to Animals** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 5:04 pm

Degenerate as he is, I am pretty sure Kid Rock would never show up at your party without booze and strippers.

Post by **clubgop** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 5:39 pm

California wrote:
clubgop wrote:
California wrote: My State rep is the only sane one in all of Sacramento
Is this performance art? To demonstrate the juxtaposition of low approval for a legislative body but high reelection rates for incumbents?
What are you on about? You know the problem is that people only look for the R or D next to the name regardless of the election

No, I dont know that. And even if that were the case, how does that square with your approval of the 17th Amendment.

Post by **TheReal_ND** » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:15 pm

If he sets up a hooker shop for all the right reasons...

Nah. MI is a fucking joke

Post by **Fife** » Sat Jul 22, 2017 9:07 am

Possible Michigan Senate candidate Kid Rock is out with his first campaign tweet aimed squarely at Dem Senators Chuck Schumer and Debbie Stabenow. Check it out

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/07/2 ... s-looking/

Post by **Hastur** » Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:32 am

I think Kid Rock has deconstructed the Trump campaign and figured out he can do it too. I believe he might be right. He has the brains and the audacity to pull it off.

Post by **Ex-California** » Sat Jul 22, 2017 12:26 pm

clubgop wrote:
California wrote:
clubgop wrote:
Is this performance art? To demonstrate the juxtaposition of low approval for a legislative body but high reelection rates for incumbents?
What are you on about? You know the problem is that people only look for the R or D next to the name regardless of the election
No, I dont know that. And even if that were the case, how does that square with your approval of the 17th Amendment.

It doesn't square with the approval of the 17th Amendment, you're correct, but what does square with it is the principle of individualism. I'm not going to let someone else do something for me that I could do myself. Same with my opposition of the Electoral College.

Post by **clubgop** » Sat Jul 22, 2017 2:27 pm

California wrote:
clubgop wrote:
California wrote: What are you on about? You know the problem is that people only look for the R or D next to the name regardless of the election
No, I dont know that. And even if that were the case, how does that square with your approval of the 17th Amendment.
It doesn't square with the approval of the 17th Amendment, you're correct, but what does square with it is the principle of individualism. I'm not going to let someone else do something for me that I could do myself. Same with my opposition of the Electoral College.

So you dont jave a problem with EC in practice just in theory.

Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18

Re: Kid Rock '18