-
brewster
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Post
by brewster » Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:44 pm
clubgop wrote:
Yes it is corporate welfare but it is also an investment. Every transaction in that place or about that place you get a piece of be it in taxes or as a landlord. Indoor arenas are licenses to print money.
But the Raiders is not indoor.
Sports stadiums do not generate significant local economic growth, Stanford expert says
http://news.stanford.edu/2015/07/30/sta ... ll-073015/
This one is about indoor
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/ar ... ms/260900/
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:21 pm
Wasn't arguing local economic growth. It's about attracting people who pay taxes. As for the indoor arena
Jobing.com Arena is guaranteed 41 hockey games annually. The other 324 nights, it must find concerts, conventions or other events to fill the schedule, and in Glendale, where the arena competes with facilities in nearby Phoenix, that can be tough to do.
"We've looked at tons of these things, and the one that we found that seemed to make sense is the Staples Center in Los Angeles," Matheson said. "But they use it 250 dates a year. They don't make sense when you're using it 41 times a year and competing with another venue down the street."
From their own article. Yeah that not gonna work out, but everywhere else.
-
heydaralon
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Post
by heydaralon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:58 pm
Welfare for corporations is a step in the right direction, but I would like to see more corporate EBT. How much do you think Uncle Sam loads up on that card every month?
Shikata ga nai
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:25 am
-
Ex-California
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Post
by Ex-California » Sun Jul 02, 2017 3:17 pm
clubgop wrote:
Wasn't arguing local economic growth. It's about attracting people who pay taxes. As for the indoor arena
Jobing.com Arena is guaranteed 41 hockey games annually. The other 324 nights, it must find concerts, conventions or other events to fill the schedule, and in Glendale, where the arena competes with facilities in nearby Phoenix, that can be tough to do.
"We've looked at tons of these things, and the one that we found that seemed to make sense is the Staples Center in Los Angeles," Matheson said. "But they use it 250 dates a year. They don't make sense when you're using it 41 times a year and competing with another venue down the street."
From their own article. Yeah that not gonna work out, but everywhere else.
The general income of Las Vegas for those 10 home games (8 regular season, 2 preseason) in addition to the multiple college regular season games and bowls it will hold (think of how many are at Jerry's Palace) is going to be HUGE. Like YOOOOOOOOOOOOUGE. Think at least 10 extra big fight weekends. It will be a huge boom for the local economy in Vegas
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Sun Jul 02, 2017 3:39 pm
California wrote:clubgop wrote:
Wasn't arguing local economic growth. It's about attracting people who pay taxes. As for the indoor arena
Jobing.com Arena is guaranteed 41 hockey games annually. The other 324 nights, it must find concerts, conventions or other events to fill the schedule, and in Glendale, where the arena competes with facilities in nearby Phoenix, that can be tough to do.
"We've looked at tons of these things, and the one that we found that seemed to make sense is the Staples Center in Los Angeles," Matheson said. "But they use it 250 dates a year. They don't make sense when you're using it 41 times a year and competing with another venue down the street."
From their own article. Yeah that not gonna work out, but everywhere else.
The general income of Las Vegas for those 10 home games (8 regular season, 2 preseason) in addition to the multiple college regular season games and bowls it will hold (think of how many are at Jerry's Palace) is going to be HUGE. Like YOOOOOOOOOOOOUGE. Think at least 10 extra big fight weekends. It will be a huge boom for the local economy in Vegas
They gonna hold big fights in an outdoor stadium? I don't know about that.
-
Ex-California
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Post
by Ex-California » Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:04 pm
clubgop wrote:California wrote:clubgop wrote:
Wasn't arguing local economic growth. It's about attracting people who pay taxes. As for the indoor arena
From their own article. Yeah that not gonna work out, but everywhere else.
The general income of Las Vegas for those 10 home games (8 regular season, 2 preseason) in addition to the multiple college regular season games and bowls it will hold (think of how many are at Jerry's Palace) is going to be HUGE. Like YOOOOOOOOOOOOUGE. Think at least 10 extra big fight weekends. It will be a huge boom for the local economy in Vegas
They gonna hold big fights in an outdoor stadium? I don't know about that.
No, the amount of fans coming to the football games and Vegas in general on home game weekends is going to be the equivalent or greater of a big fight weekend. 10 home games a year
Not fights at the stadium
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Jul 02, 2017 9:50 pm
Fife wrote:brewster wrote:Fife wrote:It's pretty common to rush to blame the mean old greedy sports team owner, as if he was stealing from the taxpayers with a gun.
Nay, nay. It takes the fatass writing the check out of the working stiff's ass to make it work. He's the one with all the guns. Legalllll guns.
Without a doubt it takes 2 to tango, but it's not too hard to push the buttons of politicians worried about the next election. This is the same methodology that public worker unions use. It's essentially blackmail. The only defense is truly not giving a shit about re-election because the mayor that loses the team is in deep trouble.
So that's an excuse?
If that's the case, what's the remedy?
Term limits.
-
Ex-California
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Post
by Ex-California » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:32 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Fife wrote:brewster wrote:
Without a doubt it takes 2 to tango, but it's not too hard to push the buttons of politicians worried about the next election. This is the same methodology that public worker unions use. It's essentially blackmail. The only defense is truly not giving a shit about re-election because the mayor that loses the team is in deep trouble.
So that's an excuse?
If that's the case, what's the remedy?
Term limits.
Single terms
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session