President Hillary Rodham Clinton

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon May 15, 2017 4:44 pm

Retreat to the secret clubhouse! Our guy is losing!
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by clubgop » Mon May 15, 2017 4:45 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yeah, I became aware when Ron Paul started getting shanghai'd.
Yeah that never happened but nice try to provide cover for your party. I see you, undercover hack bitch.
Fuck are you even talking about?

And yeah, remember how the "debate rules committee" suddenly decided to raise the bar out of reach for independents?
The fuck are even talking about?
Ron Paul participated in every primary debate.

We are talking about parties rigging their own primaries and because you are getting your ass kivked and look loke the partisan hack bitch you are, you rent a uhaul and move the goalpost to the General election. Try again undercover hack bitch.

User avatar
katarn
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:30 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by katarn » Mon May 15, 2017 4:46 pm

clubgop wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:The Republican Party is the same way. Don't you remember the Never Trumpers saying that the Party doesn't have to accept him as their candidate?
Yeah but they were open about it and they didnt hold RNC leadership positions. They tried their little coup at the convention and it failed. There was no putting on debates on Sunday night vs a playoff game so no one would watch it. No one passed Jeb Bush any debate questions. You've got no comparisons. So nice try being a good little democrat but you and GCF own this one.
Even if there were no evidence-based comparisons, the regs in the Republican and Democratic parties are similar. The point is that neither of them have to follow their constituents, not that only the Democrats haven't.
"Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage...
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by clubgop » Mon May 15, 2017 4:53 pm

pineapplemike wrote:Yeah you're right it's probably only one of the two parties that actively engage in electioneering. Even if half of this shit is true it's too much, I distinctly remember the Iowa secret vote count and Maine fiasco from my 2012 internet junkie days.

Like I said, good times
No wonder Ron Paul didnt win shit, his supporters made bitch excuses like democrats everytime they lose so goddamned always. :lol:

No proof or evidence of anything you bitches are laughable. He couldn't even win hos home state.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by clubgop » Mon May 15, 2017 4:59 pm

katarn wrote:
clubgop wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:The Republican Party is the same way. Don't you remember the Never Trumpers saying that the Party doesn't have to accept him as their candidate?
Yeah but they were open about it and they didnt hold RNC leadership positions. They tried their little coup at the convention and it failed. There was no putting on debates on Sunday night vs a playoff game so no one would watch it. No one passed Jeb Bush any debate questions. You've got no comparisons. So nice try being a good little democrat but you and GCF own this one.
Even if there were no evidence-based comparisons, the regs in the Republican and Democratic parties are similar. The point is that neither of them have to follow their constituents, not that only the Democrats haven't.
Well they do have to follow the constituents, those are the delegates to the national convention. GOP does not have Superdelegates, they have unbound delegates and the distinctuon is huge. So frankly "only the democrats haven't" is the issue.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18721
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by Martin Hash » Mon May 15, 2017 5:03 pm

Dude, don't your ears burn when you defend the indefensible?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by clubgop » Mon May 15, 2017 6:17 pm

Martin Hash wrote:Dude, don't your ears burn when you defend the indefensible?
Is that a rhetorical question as you attempt to deflect from the DNC? Cause my ears are fine if your ears are burning first I recommended, as one health care professional to another, taking off that fucking stupid hat. 8-)

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by C-Mag » Tue May 16, 2017 2:08 am

Martin Hash wrote:The Republican Party is the same way. Don't you remember the Never Trumpers saying that the Party doesn't have to accept him as their candidate?

Yeah, he Bush's were the first ones to hire the Brit Spy to fabricate dirt on Trump and Russia, then Hillary hired the same guy.
The difference in our previous election is, there is a clearly a difference on how the two parties handled their outsider candidates. First of all the GOP took on all comers who threw their hat in the ring. 17 candidates vs 4 for the Dems.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
katarn
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:30 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by katarn » Tue May 16, 2017 11:23 am

clubgop wrote:
katarn wrote:
Even if there were no evidence-based comparisons, the regs in the Republican and Democratic parties are similar. The point is that neither of them have to follow their constituents, not that only the Democrats haven't.
Well they do have to follow the constituents, those are the delegates to the national convention. GOP does not have Superdelegates, they have unbound delegates and the distinctuon is huge. So frankly "only the democrats haven't" is the issue.
I'm afraid I don't see a great distinction. Could you elaborate?
"Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage...
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace

User avatar
ssu
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by ssu » Tue May 16, 2017 11:52 am

pineapplemike wrote:I do bet the 'what-if-Trump-had-won' thread would have been pretty optimistic though..
It would be. But it would be a distant thing. And Trump would have a splendid time in the media.

I think now people would have impeachment-fever here. Just any moment now... Because Hillary wouldn't have a nice time with a GOP controlled Congress.

And boy, would the Gopsters be extremely nasty. The mood would be worse. Now at least, Trump is funny.

(Notice the Ted Cruz impersonator in the background:)
Image