Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:32 pm

MilSpecs wrote:
Fife wrote:
Kath wrote:I'd also add that if the mom fails to tell the father about the child, she can't come crying three years down the road that she's entitled to child support. She can have that if and when the father wants to be part of the child's life and she accepts that. This process needs to be more transparent, overall. Mothers who don't tell their one night stands that they are pregnant are part of the problem.

What's the correct statute of limitations?

DOB?

DOB + x years?
Is there any time limit on your desire to know that your children exist?
Red herring. What's the correct statute of limitations for paternity?

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by K@th » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:33 pm

Fife wrote: What's the correct statute of limitations?

DOB?

DOB + x years?
I don't have a fully fleshed out plan in my head, just a generic sense of fairness. It's a weird world where dad doesn't even know and mother comes along 15 years later with a demand for 15 years worth of child support.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:35 pm

Fife wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
Kath wrote: He shouldn't be allowed to force an abortion, but in a perfect world, he should be allowed to relinquish any and all responsibility & rights wrt the child.
Agreed. There's another side to this though: at some point there's another person who should have the right to health and heritage history. The guy should submit that as part of the relinquishment process. It can be done anonymously. Not having that history poses health risks, especially as we become more aware of the genetic component of diseases.
Define "relinquishment process."
I would personally go with written relinquishment at a state level, with some kind of time period for withdrawing that relinquishment. Since we're talking about pregnancy, the time period would of necessity be brief.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:39 pm

Define "relinquishment process."

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:40 pm

Fife wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
Fife wrote:

What's the correct statute of limitations?

DOB?

DOB + x years?
Is there any time limit on your desire to know that your children exist?
Red herring. What's the correct statute of limitations for paternity?
Define what you mean by 'paternity.' In the context of relinquishment? Genetic paternity? Legal paternity?
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:40 pm

You could also just abolish all the unconstitutional income stealing in the family court system. There's that too.

Women have jobs now too. You don't need child support and alimony.

I am all for paying for day care along with education, though. No reason not to get a job.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:41 pm

Fife wrote:Define "relinquishment process."
Written relinquishment as I wrote above. How would you prefer relinquishment established?
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:47 pm

MilSpecs wrote:
Fife wrote:Define "relinquishment process."
Written relinquishment as I wrote above. How would you prefer relinquishment established?
My "preferences" don't mean shit. Stop trying to change the subject.

When you say "relinquishment as I wrote above" I don't see anything. search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&author_id=7071#

I like plain talk, not hidden ball bullshit.

Define "relinquishment process."

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:07 pm

Fife wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
Fife wrote:Define "relinquishment process."
Written relinquishment as I wrote above. How would you prefer relinquishment established?
My "preferences" don't mean shit. Stop trying to change the subject.

When you say "relinquishment as I wrote above" I don't see anything. search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&author_id=7071#

I like plain talk, not hidden ball bullshit.

Define "relinquishment process."
I clearly said written relinquishment. I'm not going to write the statute. You're the lawyer.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:10 pm

MilSpecs wrote:I clearly said written relinquishment. I'm not going to write the statute. You're the lawyer.

Yeah, you clearly said some undefined term. Not acceptable for honest debate. Say what you mean and say what you mean.

Define "relinquishment process."

Just say what you mean, clearly, and we'll be able to talk it out.