Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Yes
22
63%
No
13
37%
 
Total votes: 35

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by DrYouth » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:39 pm

DrYouth wrote:And an even bigger penalty to Kath for caving to the tattler and giving the baby his binky.
Settle down Capps or you'll have to stand against the wall for a time out...
I mean if we're doing Kindergarden, might as well take it to it's logical conclusion.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:41 pm

StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:See monte, that's how you handle clubby, running to the moderator to censor him just means you can't hang and are lashing out. Grow a pair and insult him back, stop being such a pussy about it.
Or issue a challenge with actual consequences and see who the real pussy is.
Issuing a silly challenge doesn't undo your cowardly behavior, not how it works, trying to save face now isn't fooling anyone.
And resorting to a childish slanging match would?
No. Actual real life consequences, that's how you find out who's got the balls.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:44 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: Or issue a challenge with actual consequences and see who the real pussy is.
Issuing a silly challenge doesn't undo your cowardly behavior, not how it works, trying to save face now isn't fooling anyone.
And resorting to a childish slanging match would?
No. Actual real life consequences, that's how you find out who's got the balls.
Getting in a childish slang match would show that you are ever so slowing acquiring a thicker skin, but it doesn't undo the cowardice of tattling in the first place, indeed. If you want to begin to prove that you might have balls then you'll fire back instead of crying for censorship based on results of some silly challenge that you will lose anyway, the forum will side with clubgop, not montegriffo, be careful what you wish for when appealing to argument ad populum. Tattling ensures most people will perceive you as the coward, clubgop insulting you won't cause others to think he's a coward by comparison, not even close.
*yip*

User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by de officiis » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:49 pm

Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:53 pm

StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:Issuing a silly challenge doesn't undo your cowardly behavior, not how it works, trying to save face now isn't fooling anyone.
And resorting to a childish slanging match would?
No. Actual real life consequences, that's how you find out who's got the balls.
Getting in a childish slang match would show that you are ever so slowing acquiring a thicker skin, but it doesn't undo the cowardice of tattling in the first place, indeed. If you want to begin to prove that you might have balls then you'll fire back instead of crying for censorship based on results of some silly challenge that you will lose anyway, the forum will side with clubgop, not montegriffo, be careful what you wish for when appealing to argument ad populum.
I would have thought that the fact I am still here after all the abuse I get would be proof enough that I am not thin skinned.
I'm prepared to risk being banned from a forum I love being part of, popularity test or not, that is a true test of balls. Not seeing who has the best playground insults.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:56 pm

Montegriffo wrote:I would have thought that the fact I am still here after all the abuse I get would be proof enough that I am not thin skinned.
You thought wrong, the damage to your reputation when it comes to being able to take verbal abuse that you did by tattling and crying for censorship can't be undone by merely sticking around afterward, nice try.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:57 pm

Point taken. Sorry if I've disturbed your peace.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by clubgop » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:12 pm

BjornP wrote:
clubgop wrote:
BjornP wrote:
:whistle:
So you don't grasp the English, you blow them? Got it. See in Vikingland it is so cold that one doesn't give handjobs, chapped hands, you perform the act where the natural lubricant is already present.
:ugeek:
You don't know the difference between whistling and blowing? Your rabbi must have bitten down extra hard during your bris, huh?

Is your buzzing the sound of someone belonging to a people known mostly for losing every single war they've been for the last couple thousand years and sucking on the dicks of recently circumcised boys trying to make a blowjob joke? I'm fairly certain Danes hung on to our land for longer time than you ever did "yours" and we don't have your kind's love of sucking on little boy's dicks.
Man, all that because Capps capitalized an E? The world's oldest hatred is alive and well.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by clubgop » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:26 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:
BjornP wrote:
You don't know the difference between whistling and blowing? Your rabbi must have bitten down extra hard during your bris, huh?

Is your buzzing the sound of someone belonging to a people known mostly for losing every single war they've been for the last couple thousand years and sucking on the dicks of recently circumcised boys trying to make a blowjob joke? I'm fairly certain Danes hung on to our land for longer time than you ever did "yours" and we don't have your kind's love of sucking on little boy's dicks.
See monte, that's how you handle clubby, running to the moderator to censor him just means you can't hang and are lashing out. Grow a pair and insult him back, stop being such a pussy about it.
Or issue a challenge with actual consequences and see who the real pussy is.
Why would I participate in something I don't want to lose and really don't want to win? This all goes back to not understanding your enemy. You have it in your head that I want you off this board that I did what I did in furtherance of that goal. You were wrong then and certainly wrong now. You are going to hold this L. I aint giving you a way out and I certainly aint leaving.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:29 pm

Image

Nuff said
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image