Not just any mean lady, a mean lady moderator with a history of censorship, threatening to censor hockey talk. There is quite a big difference, despite your inability to see that.Kath wrote:via Imgflip Meme Generator
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
i think kath should just delete this entire thread tbhpineapplemike wrote:
Last edited by pineapplemike on Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Yeah and what makes you think clubby wasnt trolling monte? Yet you censored him anyway. No consistency to your enforcement, just admit it.Kath wrote:You are actively trying to get me to mod your posts. Transparent troll is transparent.StCapps wrote:I posted graphic details of you fucking children in the ass with strapon, yet no censorship. You are incapable of moderating out of principle, you do it all on feelz, with no consistent enforcement of the rules.Kath wrote:I'd like to see the post where I accused STA of being a child fucker PLUS went into graphic detail of how he accomplishes those goals.
The "child fucker" part isn't enough - I need to see the graphic details. If I did that, I'll delete it. But, I've never even accused you of such things, so, you're talking about shit that never happened.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Then you are a Censorship Cunt too.pineapplemike wrote:i think kath should just delete this entire thread tbhpineapplemike wrote:
*yip*
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
The rules will be enforced swiftly, consistently, and without feelings.BjornP wrote:An armed society is a polite society. MHF just needs gun drones connected to each account that will fly in through your window and start shooting your home to shreds if you cross the forum disciplinarians.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Still, if one is going to take a principled stand for liberty by abandoning politeness, it looks like we really just wind up with neither, don't it?
Mandatory politeness for all!
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I'd like to add that Kath and Martin ignored scores of my reports and only did something about the 4 they found to have crossed a line.
British people value politeness and good manners over the liberty to repeatedly make false and offensive posts on an internet discussion forum.
What a bunch of whinny faggots, it's no wonder the thin skinned cocksuckers never stick around for two years before making a stand for decency and well mannered debate. How on Earth did limp wristed, Limey panty waists ever get to build the largest Empire the world has ever seen? Everyone else must be even gayer.
British people value politeness and good manners over the liberty to repeatedly make false and offensive posts on an internet discussion forum.
What a bunch of whinny faggots, it's no wonder the thin skinned cocksuckers never stick around for two years before making a stand for decency and well mannered debate. How on Earth did limp wristed, Limey panty waists ever get to build the largest Empire the world has ever seen? Everyone else must be even gayer.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
kath seriously just delete the entire thread so we can hear how he really feels
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Gotcha...StCapps wrote:Kath didn't just ask nicely, she literally threatened to censor me and Smitty if we posted hockey talk in her safe space. She was threatening and asking, when it was just asking, that was fine and I eventually would have listened, then she escalated because she was butthurt that I didn't immediately take her advice.
Not respecting the thread is nothing burger, threats of censorship by a moderator for not posting like she wishes I would, that's a big deal.
Kath has been docked already for less than perfect moderating.
In future she is being asked not to threaten censorship.
In the grand scheme of things I am awarding Kath an A- as a moderator.
On this particular moderating assignment she got a C-.... but it wasn't a final exam or anything.... so it probably won't affect her moderating GPA.
If I was going to think of a better moderator than Kath on this forum... I can't really think of one...
There are time commitments involved... and I doubt many are up to the commitment.
It seems to be a pretty thankless job around here.
And I would prefer to have a moderator than not have one.
But forum members have responsibility here too... not just moderators.
Take yours.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am