THE ERA OF TRUMP

[Montegriffo]

She might be cute, but she's not worth my rifle.

Looks a bit young to know where to put your "rifle"

If there's grass in the field, play ball, amirite?

You sir, are a very sick man.

[K@th]

I'm not seeing much in the way of swamp draining. Swamp filling, perhaps. These picks...oy..

[Cid]

More ad hominem, so you have no argument clearly, or you'd be making it. You can't just say it's Tucker Carlson, so he never has a good argument ever, I'm not even listening. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and he does carve that congressman up in that video, if you watched the video you would see that.

They have no evidence of the Kremlin hacking shit, except take our word for it, you can trust us.

My argument was that Tucker Carlson is to journalism as Taco Bell is to nutrition (or your lower intestines.)

He carved him up because that's basically all he is trained to do, that's what he gets paid for. I'm not saying he's bad at that, I'm saying posting that as an argument against Russian hacking is something I'd expect a retard to do.

Now, personally, I think its unlikely they hacked machines for votes. That requires too much work, too many people on the ground.

Is it likely they hacked both parties and wanted to swing the election a certain way? Sure, but we're all doing that all the time. We were trying to do it in Ukraine.

If you're comfortable with that then great, because that's how the world is going to be. If you're uncomfortable with that don't be super shocked when a government that you don't like tries to do it again. I think it would be hilarious if China and Russia had a little side cyber war on who could influence our elections more. Hilarious the same way I find some of your posts actually. Damn near side splitting. I'm laughing so hard that only bourbon can soothe the pain.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Looks a bit young to know where to put your "rifle"

If there's grass in the field, play ball, amirite?

You sir, are a very sick man.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed? I got a million of 'em.

Sick/disgusting jokes are way funnier. Always.

[StCapps]

He carved him up because that's basically all he is trained to do, that's what he gets paid for. I'm not saying he's bad at that, I'm saying posting that as an argument against Russian hacking is something I'd expect a retard to do.

I never posted it as an argument against Russian hacking, I posted it because Tucker Carlson takes Adam Schiff to task for coming on his show and spouting nothing but talking points backed only by speculation. It's a rhetorical smackdown. If you took it as anything more than a hilarious example of a politician coming on a television show and getting clowned on for peddling their Russian interference schtick with weasel words, then that is on you.

[Cid]

I never posted it as an argument against Russian hacking,I posted it because Tucker Carlson takes Adam Schiff to task for coming on his show and spouting nothing but talking points backed only by speculation. It's a rhetorical smackdown. If you took it as anything more than a hilarious example of a politician coming on a television show and getting clowned on for peddling their Russian interference schtick with weasel words, then that is on you.

Speaking of Fake News, I'm really not buying this Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta's emails thing. They lie through their teeth with weasel words, here's a perfect example.

But seriously it was my bad, I know now that if I can't reply in the span of 10 seconds I might as well just pretend we're in wonderland.

[StCapps]

I never posted it as an argument against Russian hacking,I posted it because Tucker Carlson takes Adam Schiff to task for coming on his show and spouting nothing but talking points backed only by speculation. It's a rhetorical smackdown. If you took it as anything more than a hilarious example of a politician coming on a television show and getting clowned on for peddling their Russian interference schtick with weasel words, then that is on you.

Speaking of Fake News, I'm really not buying this Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta's emails thing. They lie through their teeth with weasel words, here's a perfect example.

But seriously it was my bad, I know now that if I can't reply in the span of 10 seconds I might as well just pretend we're in wonderland.

That's an example of the arguments presented by the side who claims there is proof of it, yet they present none. I posted the video to illustrate how unconvincing the people making these claims of Russian interference in the American election can get. You seem to think because I posted a Tucker Carlson video to illustrate that point that this somehow means that I think it's verifiable proof Russia didn't hack anything, and that is not the case. Just pointing out an example of weasel words bro, you read way too much into everything I write, interpret what I am implying in a rather bizarre fashion and then you assume any rational person would also interpret the same way. Take a step back and stop assuming the worst all the time, your assumptions about me are fairly terrible currently and historically.

[Cid]

You do understand the "assumption" is a two way street because you seem a bit retarded assuming I wouldn't take the quoted text with the clip as you posting your evidence for "not buying the Russian hacking."

Personally, I think you're so used to posting inane shit and not getting called on it that its shocking when it happens.

Me? I get called on it all the time, and to be truthful I could point to more threads here where you've jumped in against me than the other way around.

But then, I try to be abundantly clear, so I don't really assume you misunderstand my meaning. Which leads me to believe that you've got more of a grudge with me than vice versa.

Edit: And I'm always willing to start fresh, but I'm not going to treat you like a baby.

[Okeefenokee]

[TheReal_ND]

According to a report from The New York Times, hackers gained access to John Podesta’s email inbox after the man himself – or one of his aides – simply gave them the password by replying to a spam message.

The report states that one of Podesta’s aides, suspicious about the phishing email, forwarded it to Clinton campaign aide Charles Delavan, who replied not long after.

Who exactly was on the other end? According to The Times, it was the Russians. Other people aren’t so convinced.

In fact, given the reportedly rudimentary means of entry (phishing?!), a number of people are now calling the ‘hack’ a ‘leak.’

https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2016/12/p ... mail-spam/