Shades of Mad MagazineFife wrote:He should be expelled based on that shirt alone.C-Mag wrote:Republican Blake Farenthold paid out $84,000 for sexual harassment lawsuit from slush fund
And another one bites the dust...
-
- Posts: 2528
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am
Re: And another one bites the dust...
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: And another one bites the dust...
Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6
So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6
So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: And another one bites the dust...
They really can't see that women do these r
things just as much if not more so. The cultural Marxist (feminist) narrative doesn't match reality.
things just as much if not more so. The cultural Marxist (feminist) narrative doesn't match reality.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: And another one bites the dust...
What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn.PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 14796
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: And another one bites the dust...
Actually, people do... it's the mentally deranged that put their kids into that kind of thing and don't think there is something wrong with it.Kath wrote:What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn.PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: And another one bites the dust...
Fife wrote:He should be expelled based on that shirt alone.C-Mag wrote:Republican Blake Farenthold paid out $84,000 for sexual harassment lawsuit from slush fund
You should ask him to borrow it, cause im pretty sure you paid for it and the call girl with him.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: And another one bites the dust...
I think a very large portion of society has a negative view of them.Kath wrote:What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn.PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 2528
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am
Re: And another one bites the dust...
PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6
So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)
Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: And another one bites the dust...
de officiis wrote:PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6
So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)
Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?
As we see every time another female teacher rapes a boy, most of these people getting upset about women being assaulted do not believe it is possible for boys to be sexually assaulted or raped.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: And another one bites the dust...
There is clearly some kind of pathology being pandered to.de officiis wrote:PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6
So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)
Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?