And another one bites the dust...

User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by de officiis » Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:30 am

Fife wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Republican Blake Farenthold paid out $84,000 for sexual harassment lawsuit from slush fund
Image
He should be expelled based on that shirt alone.
Shades of Mad Magazine
Image

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:19 am

Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6

So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?

He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:27 am

They really can't see that women do these r
things just as much if not more so. The cultural Marxist (feminist) narrative doesn't match reality.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by K@th » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:31 am

PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn. :x

Image
Account abandoned.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14796
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by The Conservative » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:37 am

Kath wrote:
PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn. :x

Image
Actually, people do... it's the mentally deranged that put their kids into that kind of thing and don't think there is something wrong with it.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by C-Mag » Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:35 pm

Fife wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Republican Blake Farenthold paid out $84,000 for sexual harassment lawsuit from slush fund
Image
He should be expelled based on that shirt alone.

You should ask him to borrow it, cause im pretty sure you paid for it and the call girl with him.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Dec 06, 2017 6:34 pm

Kath wrote:
PartyOf5 wrote: "The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?
.
What about child beauty pageants. Nobody seems to mind those. Talk about pedo porn. :x

Image
I think a very large portion of society has a negative view of them.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by de officiis » Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:28 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6

So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?

He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
Image

William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)

Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:38 pm

de officiis wrote:
PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6

So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?

He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
Image

William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)

Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?

As we see every time another female teacher rapes a boy, most of these people getting upset about women being assaulted do not believe it is possible for boys to be sexually assaulted or raped.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: And another one bites the dust...

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:42 pm

de officiis wrote:
PartyOf5 wrote:Decided to post this here instead of the SJW thread since the article ties it into the current #metoo trend.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertai ... 1fde976ca6

So the Metropolitan museum is displaying an old (1938) painting of an adolescent girl spreading her legs and showing her undies. Some people want it removed. The author advocates for keeping it, but makes some really odd points when trying to defend his stance.
Now is precisely not the time to start removing art from walls, books from shelves, music from the radio or films from distribution. The focus should be on the social structures that perpetuate abuse and the people, mostly men, who commit it.
"The social structures that perpetuate abuse". Hmm. Like maybe this painting that you are defending?

He makes a number of statements like the "mostly men" one that are not backed up by any evidence. Why does that even need to be included? Is abuse perpetuated by women more acceptable to him? Probably is, due to all the usual anti-white male excuses the left comes up with for justifying their own bad behavior.
Image

William Bouguereau, L'Amour Mouille ("Wet Cupid") (1891)

Is this perpetuating the abuse of young boys?
There is clearly some kind of pathology being pandered to.